We present an extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based densely cross-linked polymers, focusing on structural properties as well as the systems’ dynamics in the presence of lithium salt. Motivated by experimental findings for networks with short PEO strands, we employ a combination of LiTFSI (lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) and LiDFOB (lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate). Recently, it has been shown that such multisalt systems outperform classical single-salt systems [ShajiI. Shaji, I. Energy Storage Mater.202244263277]. To analyze the microscopic scenario, we employ an analytical model, originally developed for non-cross-linked polymer electrolytes or blends [MaitraA. Maitra, A. 227802Phys. Rev. Lett.200798 and DiddensD. Diddens, D. J. Electrochem. Soc.2017164E3225E3231. Excluding very short PEO strands, the local dynamics is only slightly restricted compared to linear PEO and is not significantly dependent on the network structure. The transfer of lithium ions between PEO chains and the motion along the polymer backbone may be controlled through the employed salt.
Purpose For patients with large tumors palliative radiotherapy often is the only local treatment option. To prevent toxicity the administered doses are low. Dose escalation to the tumor could be an option to better smyptom control and prolong local control rates. In this prospective study we used a very pragmatic approach with a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to an almost geometrically defined tumor core to achieve this. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate feasibility. Method Patients with solid tumors > 4 cm in diameter of different histologies were eligible in this single arm, prospective, multi-institutional clinical feasibility trial with two treatment concepts: 5 × 5 Gy with an integrated boost to the tumor core of 5 × 10 Gy or 10 × 3 Gy with a boost of 10 × 6 Gy. The objective of dose escalation in this study was to deliver a minimum dose of 150% of the prescribed dose to the gross tumor volume (GTV) tumor core and to reach a maximum of at least 200% in the tumor core. Results In all, 21 patients at three study sites were recruited between January 2019 and November 2020 and were almost evenly spread (9 to 12) between the two concepts. The treated planning target volumes (PTV) averaged 389.42 cm3 (range 49.4–1179.6 cm3). The corresponding core volumes were 72.85 cm3 on average (range 4.21–338.3 cm3). Dose escalation to the tumor core with mean doses of 167.7–207.7% related to the nonboost prescribed isodose led to PTV mean doses of 120.5–163.3%. Treatment delivery and short-term follow-up was successful in all patients. Conclusions Palliative radiotherapy with SIB to the tumor core seems to be a feasible and well-tolerated treatment concept for large tumors. The applied high doses of up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions (or 60 Gy in 10 fractions) did not cause unexpected side effects in the 42 day follow-up period. Further research is needed for more information on efficacy and long-term toxicity.
Purpose: For adjuvant radiotherapy of low-risk breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, there have been many trials of hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation (PBI) over the years, with proven mild long-term toxicity. The aim of this study was to introduce a short-course dose-adapted concept, proven in whole breast irradiation (WBI) for use in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), while monitoring dosimetric data and toxicity. Methods: From April 2020 to March 2022, 61 patients with low-risk breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were treated at a single institution with percutaneous APBI of 26 Gy in five fractions every other day after breast-conserving surgery. Dosimetric data for target volume and organs at risk were determined retrospectively. Acute toxicity was evaluated. Results: The target volume of radiotherapy comprised an average of 19% of the ipsilateral mamma. The burden on the heart and lungs was very low. The mean cardiac dose during irradiation of the left breast was only 0.6 Gy. Two out of three patients remained without any acute side effects. Conclusions: Linac-based APBI is an attractive treatment option for patients with low-risk breast cancer in whom neither WBI nor complete omission of radiotherapy appears to be an adequate alternative.
Introduction: tumors of the uterine cervix are among the most common carcinomas in women. Intracervical brachytherapy is an indispensable part of curative treatment. Although the tumor is significantly more recognizable in MRI than in CT, the practical application of MRI in brachytherapy planning is still difficult. The present study examines the technical possibilities of merging CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: the treatment files and imaging of all 53 patients who had been irradiated by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) between January 2019 and August 2021 at the Department of Radiotherapy of the Hannover Medical School were evaluated, retrospectively. Patients were treated first with an external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with simultaneous chemotherapy. After an average of 4.2 weeks, the preparation for IGABT began. The clinical target volume (CTV) for brachytherapy was contoured first in an MRI acquired before starting EBRT (MRI 1) and once more in a second MRI just before starting IGABT (MRI 2). Then, after inserting the intravaginal applicator, a CT-scan was acquired, and the CTV was contoured in the CT. Finally, the recordings of MRI 1, MRI 2, and the CT were merged, and the congruence of CTVs was quantitatively evaluated. Results: the CTV delineated in MRI 2 was, on average, 28% smaller than that in MRI 1 after an average applied radiation dose of 42 Gy. The CTV delineated in the CT covered an average of no more than 80.8% of the CTV delineated in MRI 2. The congruence of CTVs was not superior in patients with a smit sleeve in the cervical channel, with a 3D-volumetric MRI or with a contrast-enhanced sequence for MRI. Conclusion: the anatomical shape and position of the uterus is significantly changed by introducing a vaginal applicator. Despite the superior delimitability of the tumor in MRI, brachytherapy cannot be reliably planned by the image fusion of an MRI without a vaginal applicator.
Radiotherapy for prostate cancer is often preceded by neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which leads to a reduction in the size of the prostate. This study examines whether it is relevant for treatment planning to acquire a second planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ADT (=MRI 2) or whether it can be planned without disadvantage based on an MRI acquired before starting ADT (=MRI 1). The imaging data for the radiotherapy treatment planning of 17 patients with prostate cancer who received two planning MRIs (before and after neoadjuvant ADT) were analyzed as follows: detailed comparable radiation plans were created separately, each based on the planning CT scan and either MRI 1 or MRI 2. After ADT for an average of 17.2 weeks, the prostate was reduced in size by an average of 24%. By using MRI 2 for treatment planning, the V60Gy of the rectum could be significantly relieved by an average of 15% with the same coverage of the target volume, and the V70Gy by as much as 33% (compared to using MRI 1 alone). Using a second MRI for treatment planning after neoadjuvant ADT in prostate cancer leads to a significant relief for the organs at risk, especially in the high dose range, with the same irradiation of the target volume, and should therefore be carried out regularly. Waiting for the prostate to shrink after a few months of ADT contributes to relief for the organs at risk and to lowering the toxicity. However, the use of reduced target volumes requires an image-guided application, and the oncological outcome needs to be verified in further studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.