Absorbance spectra of rods and some cones were measured by microspectrophotometry in 22 fish species from the brackish-water of the Baltic Sea, and when applicable, in the same species from the Atlantic Ocean (3 spp.), the Mediterranean Sea (1 sp.), or Finnish fresh-water lakes (9 spp.). The main purpose was to study whether there were differences suggesting spectral adaptation of rod vision to different photic environments during the short history (<10(4) years) of postglacial isolation of the Baltic Sea and the Finnish lakes. Rod absorbance spectra of the Baltic subspecies/populations of herring (Clupea harengus membras), flounder (Platichthys flesus), and sand goby (Pomatoschistus minutus) were all long-wavelength-shifted (9.8, 1.9, and 5.3 nm, respectively, at the wavelength of maximum absorbance, lambda(max)) compared with their truly marine counterparts, consistent with adaptation for improved quantum catch, and improved signal-to-noise ratio of vision in the Baltic light environment. Judged by the shape of the spectra, the chromophore was pure A1 in all these cases; hence the differences indicate evolutionary tuning of the opsin. In no species of fresh-water origin did we find significant opsin-based spectral shifts specific to the Baltic populations, only spectral differences due to varying A1/A2 chromophore ratio in some. For most species, rod lambda(max) fell within a wavelength range consistent with high signal-to-noise ratio of vision in the spectral conditions prevailing at depths where light becomes scarce in the respective waters. Exceptions were sandeels in the Baltic Sea, which are active only in bright light, and all species in a "brown" lake, where rod lambda(max) lay far below the theoretically optimal range.

Visual-pigment absorbance spectra and eye spectral sensitivities were examined in eight populations of opossum shrimp from different light environments. Four Finnish populations, two from the Baltic Sea and two from freshwater lakes, represent Mysis relicta, sensu stricto. The sibling species M. salemaai and M. diluviana are represented by, respectively, two Baltic Sea populations and two populations from freshwater lakes in Idaho, USA. In M. relicta, the visual pigments of the two lake populations were similar (lambda(max)=554.3+/-0.8 nm and 556.4+/-0.4 nm), but significantly red-shifted compared with the sea populations (at 529 and 535 nm) and with M. salemaai (at 521 and 525 nm). All these pigments had only A2 chromophore and the lake/sea difference indicates adaptive evolution of the opsin. In M. diluviana, lambda(max) varied in the range 505-529 nm and the shapes of spectra suggested varying A1/A2 chromophore proportions, with pure A1 in the 505 nm animals. Eye sensitivity spectra were flatter and peaked at longer wavelengths than the relevant visual-pigment templates, but declined with the same slope beyond ca. 700 nm. The deviations from visual-pigment spectra can be explained by ocular light filters based on three types of identified screening pigments.

The photoreceptors and eyes of four fish species commonly cohabiting Fennoscandian lakes with different light transmission properties were compared: pikeperch Sander lucioperca, pike Esox lucius, perch Perca fluviatilis and roach Rutilus rutilus. Each species was represented by individuals from a clear (greenish) and a humic (dark brown) lake in southern Finland: Lake Vesijärvi (LV; peak transmission around 570 nm) and Lake Tuusulanjärvi (LT; peak transmission around 630 nm). In the autumn, all species had almost purely A2-based visual pigments. Rod absorption spectra peaked at c.526 nm (S. lucioperca), c. 533 nm (E. lucius) and c. 540 nm (P. fluviatilis and R. rutilus), with no differences between the lakes. Esox lucius rods had remarkably long outer segments, 1.5-2.8-fold longer than those of the other species. All species possessed middle-wavelength-sensitive (MWS) and long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) cone pigments in single, twin or double cones. Rutilus rutilus also had two types of short-wavelength sensitive (SWS) cones: UV-sensitive [SWS1] and blue-sensitive (SWS2) cones, although in the samples from LT no UV cones were found. No other within-species differences in photoreceptor cell complements, absorption spectra or morphologies were found between the lakes. However, E. lucius eyes had a significantly lower focal ratio in LT compared with LV, enhancing sensitivity at the expense of acuity in the dark-brown lake. Comparing species, S. lucioperca was estimated to have the highest visual sensitivity, at least two times higher than similar-sized E. lucius, thanks to the large relative size of the eye (pupil) and the presence of a reflecting tapetum behind the retina. High absolute sensitivity will give a competitive edge also in terms of short reaction times and long visual range.

Foraging trait specialization is important for polymorphic Arctic charr and whitefish, but visual capabilities of different morphs are unexplored. Photoreceptor complements and absorbance spectra of rod visual pigments were studied by microspectrophotometry in two sympatric Arctic charr morphs and three sympatric whitefish morphs from two subarctic lakes. Four spectral classes of photoreceptor cells, rods and three types of cones, were found in all morphs of both species. Arctic charr rods had a pure A1 pigment (rhodopsin) with wavelength of maximum absorbance k max & 511-512 nm and no significant differences either between littoral and profundal morphs or sampling times (January/August). Rods of littoral and pelagic whitefish had practically pure A2 pigment (porphyropsin), whereas profundal whitefish had chromophore mixtures with A2:A1 & 0.8:0.2 in June, A1 decreasing to a smaller fraction in September. k max values of littoral and pelagic whitefish rods were similar and did not change significantly with season (539.3 ± 0.3 nm/539.3 ± 1.1 nm and 538.4 ± 0.4/ 539.8 ± 0.3 nm in June/September) but differed from profundal whitefish (k max = 531.5 ± 0.8/536.7 ± 1.0 nm). Differences between Arctic charr and whitefish morphs suggest importance of local light environment determining visual pigment composition.