The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co‐segregation, family cancer history profile, co‐occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case‐control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1,395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; and 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared with information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known nonpathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene‐specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant muscular disorder with a wide clinical variability. Contractions of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat on chromosome 4q35 are the molecular basis of the pathophysiology. Recently, in a subset of patients without D4Z4 repeat contractions, variants in the SMCHD1 gene have been identified that lead to hypomethylation of D4Z4 and thus DUX4 transcription, which causes FSHD type 2. In this study, we have screened 55 FSHD1-negative and 40 FSHD1-positive patients from unrelated families for potentially pathogenic variants in SMCHD1 by nextgeneration sequencing (NGS). We identified variants in SMCHD1 in 11 index patients, including missense, splice site and nonsense mutations. We developed a pyrosequencing assay to determine the methylation status of the D4Z4 repeat array and found significantly lower methylation levels for FSHD2 patients than for healthy controls and FSHD1 patients. Two out of eleven SMCHD1 mutation carriers had moderately contracted D4Z4 alleles thus these patients are suffering from FSHD1 and 2. Comparing the phenotype of patients, all FSHD2 patients were relatively mildly affected while patients with FSHD1+2 were much more severely affected than expected from their D4Z4 copy number. Our findings confirm the role of SMCHD1 mutations in FSHD2 and as a modifier of disease severity. With SMCHD1 variants found in 16.4% of phenotypic FSHD patients without D4Z4 repeat contractions, the incidence of FSHD2 is rather high and hence we suggest including sequencing of SMCHD1, haplotyping and methylation analysis in the workflow of molecular FSHD diagnostics.

Background The role of the BARD1 gene in breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition remains elusive, as published case-control investigations have revealed controversial results. We aimed to assess the role of deleterious BARD1 germline variants in BC/OC predisposition in a sample of 4920 BRCA1/2 -negative female BC/OC index patients of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC). Methods A total of 4469 female index patients with BC, 451 index patients with OC, and 2767 geographically matched female control individuals were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging rare missense variants in BARD1 . All patients met the inclusion criteria of the GC-HBOC for germline testing and reported at least one relative with BC or OC. Additional control datasets (Exome Aggregation Consortium, ExAC; Fabulous Ladies Over Seventy, FLOSSIES) were included for the calculation of odds ratios (ORs). Results We identified LoF variants in 23 of 4469 BC index patients (0.51%) and in 36 of 37,265 control individuals (0.10%), resulting in an OR of 5.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.17–9.04; P < 0.00001). BARD1- mutated BC index patients showed a significantly younger mean age at first diagnosis (AAD; 42.3 years, range 24–60 years) compared with the overall study sample (48.6 years, range 17–92 years; P = 0.00347). In the subgroup of BC index patients with an AAD < 40 years, an OR of 12.04 (95% CI = 5.78–25.08; P < 0.00001) was observed. An OR of 7.43 (95% CI = 4.26–12.98; P < 0.00001) was observed when stratified for an AAD < 50 years. LoF variants in BARD1 were not significantly associated with BC in the subgroup of index patients with an AAD ≥ 50 years (OR = 2.29; 95% CI = 0.82–6.45; P = 0.11217). Overall, rare and predicted damaging BARD1 missense variants were significantly more prevalent in BC index patients compared with control individuals (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.26–3.67; P = 0.00723). Neither LoF variants nor predicted damaging rare missense variants in BARD1 were identified in 451 familial index patients with OC. Conclusions Due to the significant association of germline LoF variants in BARD1 with early-onset BC, we suggest that intensified BC surveillance programs should be offered to women carrying pathogenic BARD1 gene variants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1137-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. ...

Pathogenic sequence variants (PSV) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk and severity of prostate cancer. We evaluated whether PSVs in BRCA1/2 were associated with risk of overall prostate cancer or high grade (Gleason 8þ) prostate cancer using an international sample of 65 BRCA1 and 171 BRCA2 male PSV carriers with prostate cancer, and 3,388 BRCA1 and 2,880 BRCA2 male PSV carriers without prostate cancer. PSVs in the 3 0 region of BRCA2 (c.7914þ) were significantly associated with elevated risk of prostate cancer compared with reference bin c.1001c.7913 [HR ¼ 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.52; P ¼ 0.001], as well as elevated risk of Gleason 8þ prostate cancer (HR ¼ 3.11; 95% CI, 1.63-5.95; P ¼ 0.001). c.756-c.1000 was also associated with elevated prostate cancer risk (HR ¼ 2.83; 95% CI, 1.71-4.68; P ¼ 0.00004) and elevated risk of Gleason 8þ prostate cancer (HR ¼ 4.95; 95% CI, 2.12-11.54; P ¼ 0.0002). No genotype-phenotype associations were detected for PSVs in BRCA1. These results demonstrate that specific BRCA2 PSVs may be associated with elevated risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer.Significance: Aggressive prostate cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers may vary according to the specific BRCA2 mutation inherited by the at-risk individual.

No abstract

The myotonic dystrophies (DMs) are the most common inherited muscular disorders in adults. In most of the cases, the disease is caused by (CTG) n /(CCTG) n repeat expansions (EXPs) in non-coding regions of the genes DMPK (dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase) and CNBP (CCHC-type zinc-finger nucleic acid-binding protein). The EXP is transcribed into mutant RNAs, which provoke a common pathomechanism that is characterized by misexpression and mis-splicing. In this study, we screened 138 patients with typical clinical features of DM being negative for EXP in the known genes. We sequenced DMPK and CNBPassociated with DM, as well as CELF1 (CUGBP, Elav-like family member 1) and MBNL1 (muscleblind-like splicing regulator 1) -associated with the pathomechanism of DM, for pathogenic variants, addressing the question whether defects in other genes could cause a DM-like phenotype. We identified variants in three unrelated patients in the MBNL1 gene, two of them were heterozygous missense mutations and one an in-frame deletion of three amino acids. The variants were located in different conserved regions of the protein. The missense mutations were classified as potentially pathogenic by prediction tools. Analysis of MBNL1 splice target genes was carried out for one of the patients using RNA from peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL). Analysis of six genes known to show mis-splicing in the skeletal muscle gave no informative results on the effect of this variant when tested in PBL. The association of these variants with the DM phenotype therefore remains unconfirmed, but we hope that in view of the key role of MBNL1 in DM pathogenesis our observations may foster further studies in this direction.

No abstract