No abstract

Hearing loss after cisplatin therapy occurs mainly at high frequencies and at cisplatin dosages more than 60 mg/m2. It is more pronounced when cisplatin is given once every 2 weeks.

Continuous dosing of R115777 is feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile at a dose of 300 mg bid.

Our objective was to study the feasibility of schedule- and dose-intensive cisplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when given on 1 day in four 2-weekly cycles. Cisplatin was administered as a 3 h i.v. infusion followed by gemcitabine as a 30-min i.v. infusion on the same day, every 2 weeks. An interval of 1 h between the two infusions was applied. Patients received four courses without any break. An interpatient dose-escalation scheme was used. The starting dose was 87.5 mg/m of cisplatin and 1350 mg/m of gemcitabine. The pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined in plasma and white blood cells. In total, 23 patients were included in the study. Median age of the patients was 56 years (range 27-76) and most patients were in good clinical condition. Thirteen patients received all planned courses. Dose-limiting toxicity was Common Toxicity Criteria grade 2 ototoxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was established at cisplatin 90 mg/m in combination with gemcitabine 1500 mg/m. This short induction schedule is practical and convenient for the patient. We conclude that the combination of cisplatin at a dose intensity of 51 mg/m/week followed by gemcitabine (1500 mg/m) on the same day is clinically feasible in NSCLC patients when given as a 2-weekly cycle.

Taken together, the information presented in this paper provides a comprehensive description of the essential requirements for establishing a high-quality service for soft tissue sarcomas in adults and bone sarcomas. The ECCO expert group is aware that it is not possible to propose a 'one size fits all' system for all countries, but urges that access to multidisciplinary teams is guaranteed to all patients with sarcoma.

No abstract

Over the last decades, knowledge on the genetic defects involved in tumor formation and growth has increased rapidly. This has launched the development of novel anticancer agents, interfering with the proteins encoded by the identified mutated genes. One gene of particular interest is ras, which is found mutated at high frequency in a number of malignancies. The Ras protein is involved in signal transduction: it passes on stimuli from extracellular factors to the cell nucleus, thereby changing the expression of a number of growth regulating genes. Mutated Ras proteins remain longer in their active form than normal Ras proteins, resulting in an overstimulation of the proliferative pathway. In order to function, Ras proteins must undergo a series of post-translational modifications, the most important of which is farnesylation. Inhibition of Ras can be accomplished through inhibition of farnesyl transferase, the enzyme responsible for this modification. With this aim, a number of agents, designated farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTIs), have been developed that possess antineoplastic activity. Several of them have recently entered clinical trials. Even though clinical testing is still at an early stage, antitumor activity has been observed. At the same time, knowledge on the biochemical mechanisms through which these drugs exert their activity is expanding. Apart from Ras, they also target other cellular proteins that require farnesylation to become activated, e.g. RhoB. Inhibition of the farnesylation of RhoB results in growth blockade of the exposed tumor cells as well as an increase in the rate of apoptosis. In conclusion, FTIs present a promising class of anticancer agents, acting through biochemical modulation of the tumor cells.

Background: Patients with cancer who are treated with monoclonal antibodies are at risk for developing infusion reactions. However, for some monoclonal antibodies, the incidence of infusion reactions is low or can be lowered by the use of adequate premedication schedules. It is often feasible to increase the infusion rate/lower the post-administration observation time. This review gives an overview of infusion reactions and the possibility of accelerating infusion rates. Materials and Methods: Data on infusion reactions and infusion rates for all monoclonal antibodies that are licensed in the European Union for treatment of solid tumors or hematological malignancies, found by a literature search, were included in this review. Results: For 11 out of the 21 monoclonal antibodies data exceeding the registration text were found and described. Faster infusion schedules are possible for bevacizumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, panitimumab, and rituximab. Conclusion: We propose optimal infusion schedules for each drug.