No abstract

Background: Whether blood eosinophil counts and exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are associated with important outcomes in mild asthma is unclear. Methods: This question was explored in a pre-specified analysis of a 52week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial in patients with mild asthma receiving only reliever inhalers, comparing salbutamol 200µg asneeded, maintenance budesonide 200µg twice-daily with salbutamol as needed, and budesonide/formoterol 200/6µg as-needed. Outcomes were compared between patients with blood eosinophils of <0.15, 0.15-<0.3 and ≥0.3x109/L; FeNO of <20, 20-50 and >50ppb; and a composite score based on both. Results: The proportion of patients randomised to as-needed salbutamol having a severe exacerbation increased progressively with increasing blood eosinophil sub-group (4.1%, 6.5% and 19.5%; p=0.014). There were no significant interactions between either biomarker and the effect of as-needed budesonide/formoterol compared with as-needed salbutamol for either exacerbations or severe exacerbations. However, there were significant interactions between blood eosinophil sub-groups and the effect of maintenance budesonide compared with as needed salbutamol for exacerbations (p<0.001) and severe exacerbations (p<0.001). Maintenance budesonide was more effective than as-needed salbutamol in patients with eosinophils ≥0.3x109/L for exacerbations (odds ratio 0.13; 95% CI 0.05-0.33) and severe exacerbations (0.11; 0.03-0.45). This was not the case for eosinophils <0.15x109/L (odds ratio for exacerbations 1.15; 0.51-1.28 and severe exacerbations 5.72; 0.97-33.6). There was no consistent interaction between treatment response and FeNO or the composite score. Conclusions: In patients with mild asthma the effects of as-needed budesonide/formoterol on exacerbations are independent of biomarker profile, whereas the benefits of maintenance inhaled budesonide are greater in patients with high blood eosinophil counts.

The X-linked transcription factor FOXP3 is expressed by epithelial cells of organs including the breast, where it is considered a tumour suppressor. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 also regulates the development of breast cancer by stimulating cell migration towards CXCL12-expressing sites of metastatic spread. During activation, human T cells show reciprocal regulation of FOXP3 and CXCR4. This study was designed to examine the role FOXP3 plays in metastatic breast cancer, with a particular focus on its potential to regulate CXCR4. Human breast cancer samples showed significantly decreased FOXP3 protein expression but an increased number of CXCR4 transcripts. In comparison with normal primary breast epithelial cells, FOXP3 was down-regulated at both transcript and protein levels in the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. In the invasive MDA-MB-231 cells, the remaining FOXP3 was located predominately within the cytoplasm. Following stable FOXP3 overexpression in MDA-MB-231 cells, significant decreases were observed in the expression of ErbB2/HER2, SKP2, c-MYC, and CXCR4. In contrast, an increase in p21 expression led to inhibition of cell proliferation, with a greater proportion in the G1 phase of the cell cycle suggesting the induction of senescence. Specific knockdown of FOXP3 in normal human breast epithelial cells with siRNA significantly increased ErbB2/HER2, SKP2, c-MYC, and CXCR4, and decreased p21 expression. These cells also showed a significantly increased chemotactic response towards CXCL12, consistent with a role for FOXP3 in the regulation of cell migration. Results from this study are consistent with FOXP3 functioning as an important tumour suppressor in breast cancer. Indeed, the potential functions of FOXP3 in breast epithelium can now be extended to include regulation of CXCR4 expression and response to the pro-metastatic chemokine CXCL12.

No abstract

Background Cerebral oximetry using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been shown to reduce neurological dysfunction and hospital length-of-stay after adult cardiac surgery in some but not all studies. We audited maintaining cerebral saturations at or above baseline and showed improved neurological and length-of-stay outcomes. Our hypothesis for this study was that our NIRS protocol would improve neurological and length-of-stay outcomes. Methods This prospective, single centre, double-blinded controlled study randomized 182 consecutive patients, scheduled for cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. Participants were randomized by concealed envelope prior to anaesthesia. NIRS study group were managed perioperatively using our NIRS protocol of 8 interventions, increase cardiac output, normocapnia, increase mean arterial pressure, increase inspired oxygen, depth of anaesthesia, blood transfusion, correction of bypass cannula, change of surgical plan to restore levels equal to or above baseline. The control group had standard management without NIRS. Primary outcomes were neurological impairment (early and late) and hospital length-of-stay. Secondary outcomes were ventilation times, intensive care length-of-stay, major organ dysfunction and mortality. Results 91 patients entered each group. There was a significant improvement in self-reported six-month general functionality in the NIRS group ( p = 0.016). Early neurological dysfunction and hospital length-of-stay was the same in both groups. Of the secondary outcomes only Intensive Care length-of-stay was statistically significant, being shorter in the NIRS group ( p = 0.026). Conclusion Maintaining cerebral saturations above baseline reduces time spent in Intensive Care and may improve long term functional recovery but not stroke, major organ dysfunction and mortality.