Past studies carried out to determine whether the spectral power distribution (SPD) of a lamp affects facial recognition led to mixed results, and one reason for this could be that different studies presented different levels of task difficulty, this being a function of target size, observation duration and type of procedure. This article presents two facial recognition experiments carried out using matching and identification procedures to explore task difficulty as defined by observation duration and target luminance. It was confirmed that identification is more difficult than matching. A relationship between task difficulty (luminance and duration) and recognition probability was found and this allows the luminance to be determined for a given probability.

The performance of distance-based classifiers heavily depends on the underlying distance metric, so it is valuable to learn a suitable metric from the data. To address the problem of multimodality, it is desirable to learn local metrics. In this short paper, we define a new intuitive distance with local metrics and influential regions, and subsequently propose a novel local metric learning method for distancebased classification. Our key intuition is to partition the metric space into influential regions and a background region, and then regulate the effectiveness of each local metric to be within the related influential regions. We learn local metrics and influential regions to reduce the empirical hinge loss, and regularize the parameters on the basis of a resultant learning bound. Encouraging experimental results are obtained from various public and popular data sets.

No abstract

Active learning aims to reduce annotation cost by predicting which samples are useful for a human teacher to label. However it has become clear there is no best active learning algorithm. Inspired by various philosophies about what constitutes a good criteria, different algorithms perform well on different datasets. This has motivated research into ensembles of active learners that learn what constitutes a good criteria in a given scenario, typically via multi-armed bandit algorithms. Though algorithm ensembles can lead to better results, they overlook the fact that not only does algorithm efficacy vary across datasets, but also during a single active learning session. That is, the best criteria is non-stationary. This breaks existing algorithms' guarantees and hampers their performance in practice. In this paper, we propose dynamic ensemble active learning as a more general and promising research direction. We develop a dynamic ensemble active learner based on a non-stationary multi-armed bandit with expert advice algorithm. Our dynamic ensemble selects the right criteria at each step of active learning. It has theoretical guarantees, and shows encouraging results on 13 popular datasets.

No abstract