ObjectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disorder, has been associated with nearly 100 susceptibility loci. Nevertheless, these loci only partially explain SLE heritability and their putative causal variants are rarely prioritised, which make challenging to elucidate disease biology. To detect new SLE loci and causal variants, we performed the largest genome-wide meta-analysis for SLE in East Asian populations.MethodsWe newly genotyped 10 029 SLE cases and 180 167 controls and subsequently meta-analysed them jointly with 3348 SLE cases and 14 826 controls from published studies in East Asians. We further applied a Bayesian statistical approach to localise the putative causal variants for SLE associations.ResultsWe identified 113 genetic regions including 46 novel loci at genome-wide significance (p<5×10−8). Conditional analysis detected 233 association signals within these loci, which suggest widespread allelic heterogeneity. We detected genome-wide associations at six new missense variants. Bayesian statistical fine-mapping analysis prioritised the putative causal variants to a small set of variants (95% credible set size ≤10) for 28 association signals. We identified 110 putative causal variants with posterior probabilities ≥0.1 for 57 SLE loci, among which we prioritised 10 most likely putative causal variants (posterior probability ≥0.8). Linkage disequilibrium score regression detected genetic correlations for SLE with albumin/globulin ratio (rg=−0.242) and non-albumin protein (rg=0.238).ConclusionThis study reiterates the power of large-scale genome-wide meta-analysis for novel genetic discovery. These findings shed light on genetic and biological understandings of SLE.
Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease with a background of polygenic inheritance. Both environmental and genetic factors are involved in the etiology of the disease. In the last two decades, numerous studies have been conducted through linkage analysis, genome-wide association study (GWAS), and direct sequencing to explore the role of genetic variation in disease pathogenesis and progression. To date, >80 psoriasis susceptibility genes have been identified, including HLA-Cw6, IL12B, IL23R, and LCE3B/3C. Some genetic markers have been applied in disease prediction, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and new drug development, which could further explain the pathogenesis of psoriasis and promote the development of precision medicine. This review summarizes related research on genetic variation in psoriasis and explores implications of the findings in clinical application and the promotion of a personalized medicine project.
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is characterized by the inflammation of small and medium vessels and presence of proteinase 3-ANCA or myeloperoxidase-ANCA in the circulation. AAV comprises three clinical subtypes: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic GPA (EGPA). Although the pathogenesis of AAV is still unclear, genetic and environmental factors and the immune system are thought to be involved. Genetic factors have been confirmed to play an important role in AAV. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants in MHC and non-MHC regions associated with AAV. The strongest evidence of MHC association in AAV is human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DP. A significant association between AAV and genetic variations in non-MHC regions, such as CTLA-4, FCGR2A, PTPN22, SERPINA1, and TLR9 has also been found. Moreover, different clinical subtypes of AAV have distinct genetic backgrounds. GPA is associated with HLA-DP1, MPA with HLA-DQ, and EGPA with HLA-DRB4. These findings could help elucidate the etiology of AAV and develop new biomarkers for diagnosis and targeted therapy. Herein, we briefly summarize the updates on the genetic pathogenesis and biomarkers of AAV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.