Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is a mitochondrially inherited disease leading to blindness. A mitochondrial DNA point mutation at the 11778 nucleotide site of the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) gene is the most common cause. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2) carrying ND4 (rAAV2-ND4) in LHON patients carrying the G11778A mutation. Nine patients were administered rAAV2-ND4 by intravitreal injection to one eye and then followed for 9 months. Ophthalmologic examinations of visual acuity, visual field, and optical coherence tomography were performed. Physical examinations included routine blood and urine. The visual acuity of the injected eyes of six patients improved by at least 0.3 log MAR after 9 months of follow-up. In these six patients, the visual field was enlarged but the retinal nerve fibre layer remained relatively stable. No other outcome measure was significantly changed. None of the nine patients had local or systemic adverse events related to the vector during the 9-month follow-up period. These findings support the feasible use of gene therapy for LHON.
Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is a disease that leads to blindness. Gene therapy has been investigated with some success, and could lead to important advancements in treating LHON. This was a prospective, open-label trial involving 9 LHON patients at Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China, from August 2011 to December 2015. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of gene therapy for LHON. Nine LHON patients voluntarily received an intravitreal injection of rAAV2-ND4. Systemic examinations and visual function tests were performed during the 36-month follow-up period to determine the safety and efficacy of this gene therapy. Based on successful experiments in an animal model of LHON, 1 subject also received an rAAV2-ND4 injection in the second eye 12 months after gene therapy was administered in the first eye. Recovery of visual acuity was defined as the primary outcome of this study. Changes in the visual field, visual evoked potential (VEP), optical coherence tomography findings, liver and kidney function, and antibodies against AAV2 were defined as secondary endpoints. Eight patients (Patients 2–9) received unilateral gene therapy and visual function improvement was observed in both treated eyes (Patients 4, 6, 7, and 8) and untreated eyes (Patients 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8). Visual regression fluctuations, defined as changes in visual acuity greater than or equal to 0.3 logMAR, were observed in Patients 2 and 9. Age at disease onset, disease duration, and the amount of remaining optic nerve fibers did not have a significant effect on the visual function improvement. The visual field and pattern reversal VEP also improved. The patient (Patient 1) who received gene therapy in both eyes had improved visual acuity in the injected eye after the first treatment. Unfortunately, visual acuity in this eye decreased 3 months after he received gene therapy in the second eye. Animal experiments suggested that ND4 expression remains stable in the contralateral eye after intravitreal injections. No serious safety problem was observed in the 3-year follow-up of the 9 participants enrolled in this virus-based gene therapy. Meanwhile, our results support the use of intravitreal rAAV2-ND4 as an aggressive maneuver in our clinical trial. Further study in additional patients and in these 9 subjects is needed to better understand the effects of rAAV2-ND4 gene therapy on LHON and to increase the applications of this technique.
Gene therapy may be a promising approach for the treatment of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with this condition who were recruited into an upcoming gene therapy clinical trial and to assess any changes in the detection parameters to provide support for the clinical trial. Sixteen patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy were evaluated using visual function tests 12 months before the initiation of gene therapy. Then, the results of visual acuity (VA), visual field (VF), RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) thickness, and Pattern-reversal Visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) were compared and analyzed. A total of 32 eyes of 16 patients were evaluated. Based on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), 24 eyes were relatively stable compared with the baseline evaluation, and 8 eyes had significant changes, including 5 eyes that showed improvement and 3 eyes that showed impairment. In all eyes, the changes in the best-corrected visual acuity were significantly correlated with the changes in the visual field index (VFI), mean defect (MD), and P100 of the visual evoked potential. In the eyes with relatively stable BCVA and those with an obvious improvement in the BCVA, only the visual mean defect showed a significant change; the other indicators were not significantly different. Aside from the patients showing a tendency of spontaneous improvement, the others were in accordance with the requirement. The effects of Leber hereditary optical neuropathy (LHON) gene therapy should be evaluated primarily based on visual acuity. Additionally, visual field, neural fiber thickness, and electrophysiology should be considered in the evaluation.
The present study aimed to examine changes in the expression of angiogenic growth factors in vascular endothelial cells isolated from colon cancer after bevacizumab treatment in vitro, and to explore a potential mechanism of their self-regulation as a possible mechanism for antiangiogenic therapy failure in clinics. Vascular endothelial cells were isolated from tumors of colon cancer patients and transfected with recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or pGIPZ-VEGF RNA interference in order to upregulate or downregulate VEGF expression. Changes in VEGF expression and its correlation with the expression of angiogenesis-related factors, including basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and angiopoietin 1 (ANG1), after treatment with bevacizumab in vitro, were investigated. The results showed that in cells with VEGF overexpression, bFGF and ANG1 were downregulated, whereas in cells in which VEGF was knocked down, upregulation of bFGF and ANG1 was detected. In cells treated with bevacizumab, a significant upregulation of VEGF and downregulation of bFGF and ANG1 were observed. Our data indicate that after bevacizumab treatment, a potential self-regulating mechanism of angiogenic growth factors in colon cancer-derived endothelial cells is activated, which may explain why current antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab has limited effects in prolonging the survival of colon cancer patients.
Background: Current treatments for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) targeting single vascular growth factors are ineffective in preventing neoangiogenesis. Methods: We investigated the redundant/compensatory mechanisms between vascular growth factors in ROP. Cultured retinal vascular endothelial cells under CoCl2-induced hypoxia were transfected with recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or pGIPZ-VEGF RNA interference to up- and downregulate VEGF expression, respectively. At 48 h after transfection, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and angiopoietin 1 (ANG1) gene expression as well as mitotic cycle changes were analyzed in the cells and correlated with the change in VEGF expression. Results: Compared with the normal control group 1, at 30 min, 12 h and 24 h, the expressions of VEGF, bFGF and ANG1 in the hypoxia control group 2 were significantly higher. In the highly expressing VEGF group (group 3), the expressions of bFGF and ANG1 were downregulated, while in the low-expressing VEGF group 4, the expressions of bFGF and ANG1 were significantly upregulated. In the bevacizumab treatment group 5, the expressions of VEGF, bFGF and ANG1 were similar to those in group 2, and the difference was not significant. Conclusions: A compensatory mechanism (redundancy) exists between vascular growth factors in ROP. Such a phenomenon could partially explain why the inhibition of a single growth factor cannot effectively prevent the recurrence of neovascularization in ROP. A more effective strategy for treating ROP may be to inhibit VEGF and its redundant pathways.
Backgrounds Surgical resection of large primary breast tumor often results in large chest wall defects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using adjacent skin rotation (ASR) flap in patients with giant primary breast tumor. Methods A total of 26 giant primary breast tumor patients treated with ASR flap were included in this study. The postoperative conditions, including operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and clinical complications were observed. Meanwhile, the information on 17 breast tumor patients treated with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap were collected and assigned to a control group. Results The mean defect size after mastectomy was 16.7 × 13.4 cm, while the median follow‐up period was 13 months after surgery. A total of 15.4% patients had developed with local complications, and one of them had more than one complication. When comparing the postoperative outcomes, statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to operating time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). Conclusions ASR flap is a reliable technique for immediate reconstruction of massive chest wall defects in patients with giant primary breast tumor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.