The overarching aim of this study is to use core measurements of porosity and permeability in three wells (MO1, MO2, and MO3) to generate a scheme of sandstone reservoir zonation for identification of flow units in the E-M gas field of the Western Bredasdorp Basin Offshore in South Africa. The evaluation method began by establishing rock types within a geological framework that allowed the definition of five facies, grouped as facies A, B, C, D, and E. Facies A was recognized as the best petrophysical rock type. In contrast, facies E was recognized as impervious rock. The results of independent reservoir classification methods were integrated to identify flow zones that yielded positive results. The results ultimately culminated in a zonation scheme for the Basin. Twelve flow zones were identified and were broadly classified as high, moderate, low, very low, and tight zones. The high zone was characterized by pore throat radius of ‡ 10 lm, flow zone index (FZI) of ‡ 5.0 lm, and flow unit efficiency (FUE) of ‡ 0.8. In contrast, very low efficiency zones had pore throat radius and FZI of < 2 lm, and FUE of £ 0.2. The high-efficiency zones were comparable to facies A and the tight zone to facies E. Facie C provided sand-sand contacts that allowed flow between the zones. One high, two moderate, four low, and five very low efficiency zones were identified. The plot of FUE can be compared directly with flowmeter logs. The results obtained from this study will serve as an input parameter for reservoir studies in the western Bredasdorp Basin.

No abstract

No abstract

This study aims to generate rock units based on core permeability and porosity of OW oilfield in the Bredasdorp Basin offshore South Africa. In this study, we identified and classified lithofacies based on sedimentology reports in conjunction with well logs. Lucia's petrophysical classification method is used to classify rocks into three classes. Results revealed three lithofacies as A (sandstone, coarse to medium-grained), B (fine to medium-grained sandstone), and C (carbonaceous claystone, finely laminated with siltstone). Lithofacies A is the best reservoir quality and corresponds to class 1, while lithofacies B and C correspond to class 2 and 3, which are good and poor reservoir quality rock, respectively. An integrated reservoir zonation for the rocks is based on four different zonation methods (Flow Zone indicator (FZI), Winland r35, Hydraulic conductivity (HC), and Stratigraphy modified Lorenz plot (SMLP)). Four flow zones Reservoir rock types (RRTs) were identified as RRT1, RRT3, RRT4, and RRT5, respectively. The RRT5 is the best reservoir quality composed of a megaporous rock unit, with an average FZI value between 5 and 10 µm, and HC from 40 to 120 mD/v3, ranked as very good. The most prolific flow units (RRT5 and RRT4 zones) form more than 75% of each well's flow capacities are supplied by two flow units (FU1 and FU3). The RRT1 is the most reduced rock quality composed of impervious and nanoporous rock. Quartz is the dominant framework grain, and siderite is the dominant cement that affects flow zones. This study has demonstrated a robust approach to delineate flow units in the OW oilfield. We have developed a useful regional petrophysical reservoir rock flow zonation model for clastic reservoir sediments. This study has produced, for the first time, insights into the petrophysical properties of the OW oilfield from the Bredasdorp Basin South Africa, based on integration of core and mineralogy data. A novel sandstone reservoir zonation classification criteria developed from this study can be applied to other datasets of sandstone reservoirs with confidence.

No abstract

No abstract

The fluid substitution method is used for predicting elastic properties of reservoir rocks and their dependence on pore fluid and porosity. This method makes it possible to predict changes in elastic response of a rock saturation with different fluids. This study focused on the Upper Shallow Marine sandstone reservoirs of five selected wells (MM1, MM2, MM3, MM4, and MM5) in the Bredasdorp Basin, offshore South Africa. The integration of petrophysics and rock physics (Gassmann fluid substitution) was applied to the upper shallow marine sandstone reservoirs for reservoir characterisation. The objective of the study was to calculate the volume of clay, porosity, water saturation, permeability, and hydrocarbon saturation, and the application of the Gassmann fluid substitution modelling to determine the effect of different pore fluids (brine, oil, and gas) on acoustic properties (compressional velocity, shear velocity, and density) using rock frame properties. The results showed average effective porosity ranging from 8.7% to 16.6%, indicating a fair to good reservoir quality. The average volume of clay, water saturation, and permeability values ranged from 8.6% to 22.3%, 18.9% to 41.6%, and 0.096-151.8 mD, respectively. The distribution of the petrophysical properties across the field was clearly defined with MM2 and MM3 revealing good porosity and MM1, MM4, and MM5 revealing fair porosity. Well MM4 revealed poor permeability, while MM3 revealed good permeability. The fluid substitution affected rock property significantly. The primary velocity, Vp, slightly decreased when brine was substituted with gas in wells MM1, MM2, MM3, and MM4. The shear velocity, Vs, remained unaffected in all the wells. This study demonstrated how integration of petrophysics and fluid substitution can help to understand the behaviour of rock properties in response to fluid saturation changes in the Bredasdorp Basin. The integration of these two disciplines increases the obtained results' quality and reliability.

This case study involves the unique application of density correction software applied to density data, prior to the estimation of geopressure gradients. The K-R gas field was discovered in 1983 about 50 km west, off the F-A gas field offshore South Africa. During exploration; gas discoveries were made in well KR-1 and KR-8, potentially commercial gas and encouraging oil flow rates in well KR-2, KR-4 and KR-6, a dry well for KR-5 and a dry well with encouraging oil shows in KR-3. The aim of this study is to create a model that evaluates the geomechanical behaviour of the upper shallow marine reservoir (USM) of the Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa and provide a safe drilling mud window for future work in the area. The K-R field has a strong NW-SE fault trend, resulting in a maximum horizontal stress orientation of 125°, determined from structural depth maps. All geopressure gradients were modelled using the drillworks @ software at the top (TUSM) and bottom (BUSM) of the reservoir. The Eaton method, that can predict pore pressure from either velocity or resistivity, was used to calculate both pore pressure and fracture gradient and then calibrated using "real" data from well completion and driller's reports. The pore pressure and fracture gradient are what set the upper and lower mud weight limits. These values range between 8.46 and 9.60 ppg and 10.12-15.33 ppg, respectively. The rock mechanical properties (Friction angle, cohesive strength and uniaxial compressive strength) were empirically derived and show a similar trend for all wells. The drilling mud window becomes more constricted at depths below 2600 m, to the TD of the well.