Abstract

Background

Necrotising Fasciitis is a life threatening soft tissue infection which requires aggressive, early surgical management.

Case presentation

We present a rare case of a retroperitoneal perforation of a carcinoma of the caecum presenting as a necrotising fasciitis of the anterior abdominal wall.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of early aggressive debridement to healthy tissue limits, the consideration of a rare underlying cause, and the scope for plastic surgical reconstruction in order that aggressive initial surgery can be adequately performed.

It is well known that 40 - 80% of information provided by clinicians is forgotten immediately by patients. Furthermore, 50% of the information remembered is incorrect. Research has shown that receiving written communication meets with high satisfaction from patients. According to the NHS plan to improve healthcare delivery, it has been recommended that patients should receive copies of letters written by doctors and that the policy would be implemented in full by April 2004. A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing day-case gynaecological surgery under a single consultant were sent a postal questionnaire. Questions included were whether the letter was helpful, informative, reassuring, confusing or alarming. Patients were further asked whether they would prefer a similar communication in the future. A total of 78 patients replied. Of these, 67 patients found the letter helpful and preferred to have similar communication in future. Only two patients found the letter confusing and one of these was alarmed as well. Overall, 62 patients found the letter reassuring. The majority of the patients found the copy of GP discharge letter helpful, informative, non-alarming and reassuring and wanted a similar communication in the future. The extra workload involved was minimal and the extra expense involved only an extra page, envelope and postage.

Introduction The rapid spread of the coronavirus pandemic and the associated high morbidity and mortality led to sudden lock down, forcing the elderly and others in the high risk group into isolation. Elective health care services including diagnostics, therapeutics and elective surgical services were put on hold, leading to delays seriously affecting cancer and non-cancer related services. In spite of lessons learnt during the first wave, similar issues have persisted during the second wave, increasing the pressure on an already fragile infrastructure. Methods Information related to surgical patients admitted since lock down (March to August 2020) as an emergency was collected on a structured proforma and analysed. Data was gathered from prospectively kept patient admission lists and Electronic Discharge summaries. All the patients who were directly or indirectly affected with poor outcomes including delayed diagnosis and treatment were identified and included in the analysis. Results A total of 185 patients were admitted as an emergency during this period. Of these Eight patients admitted under surgical care were included in the study. Four out of eight patients were diagnosed with advanced cancer and the remainder presented with complications of benign pathologies. Of the four patients with advanced cancer, three patients had advanced colorectal and the fourth had advanced ovarian cancer. All four patients either presented late or had delayed access to investigations. Three out four patients with benign disease presented with complications due to cancellation of elective and semi urgent services. One patient who was COVID positive and presented with bowel perforation died after a prolonged hospital stay. Conclusion There is definite evidence of unfavourable patient outcomes in non COVID patients as a result of the COVID pandemic. As COVID is unlikely to whither down in the very near future and highs and lows are expected, rapid and safe reintroduction of elective health care services affected by COVID is the call of the hour. In addition, more efforts should be directed towards increasing awareness amongst patients regarding the importance of reporting red flag symptoms and encouraging them to access health care services.

No abstract

This, the first case-based survey the authors could find, highlights an issue requiring significant improvement. The implications are likely to be relevant to clinicians in all UK hospitals.

Background In March 2020 NHS England issued guidelines recognizing the elective component of cancer surgeries may be ‘curtailed’, due to staffing and supply shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it suggested, ‘local solutions’ should be sought in order to protect the delivery of cancer services. We aimed to compare surgeons’ practice for the provision of colorectal (CR) cancer surgery across the United Kingdom (UK), against updated Joint Royal Colleges & ACPGBI guidelines and highlight differences in practice, if any. Method An online survey was conducted. It examined surgical practice across the UK against current protocols for CR cancer surgeries, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 29 individual responses were received from 23 NHS Trusts across the UK. 23/29 (79%) surgeons ceased or experienced delays in their CR cancer surgeries during the pandemic, with 3/29 (10%) yet to reintroduce these services. 19/26 (73%) surgeons instructed their patients to self-isolate prior to surgery, of which 5/19 (26%) correctly enforced a duration of 14 days. 10/19 (53%) participants adhered to guidelines of performing a CT chest within 24 h of surgery. 10/26 (38%) participants believe their patients are experiencing longer hospital admissions in the COVID-19 setting. Conclusion This snap shot survey highlights the dramatic variations in CR cancer surgery practice within the UK and inconsistent adherence to protocols. Guidelines will no doubt change as our knowledge of COVID-19 increases both nationally and internationally. It is essential CR surgeons keep up to date with changes in guidance, so uniformity in practice can be maintained.

No abstract

Retroperitoneal abscesses can be gastrointestinal, urological or vascular in origin, and can spread via the retrofascial compartment through the psoas muscle to the lower limb. We describe the case of a 73-year-old woman with right knee pain for three weeks, a cellulitic right thigh and cholestatic liver function tests. A purulent sinus developed in the popliteal fossa and computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a right-sided retroperitoneal collection with gas, extending to the right pelvis and inguinal region. The popliteal fossa sinus and retroperitoneal collection were identified as a single pathology through computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and culture of identical organisms. At laparotomy, perforated duodenal ulcer disease was identified as the cause of the retroperitoneal abscess. Clinicians should seek to exclude retroperitoneal sources of infection in cases of lower leg infection, including perforated duodenal ulcer, caecal adenocarcinoma and appendicitis.