No abstract

No abstract

Background The utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) as a life‐supporting therapy has increased exponentially over the last decade. As more patients receive and survive ECMO, there are a number of unanswered clinical questions about their long‐term prognosis and organ function including the need for long‐term dialysis. Methods We aimed to utilize over 208 patient‐years of follow‐up data from our large institutional cohort of VA‐ECMO patients to determine the incidence of requiring VA‐ECMO support on the need for renal replacement therapy after discharge (LT‐dialysis). This retrospective review included all adult VA‐ECMO patients at our institution from January 2014 to October 2018 (N = 283). Results Out of the 99 (35%) survivors, 88 (89%) did not require LT‐dialysis of any duration after discharge from the index hospitalization. Patients who required VA‐ECMO for decompensated cardiogenic shock were more likely to need LT‐dialysis (p = .034), and those who required renal replacement therapy during VA‐ECMO (N = 27) also had a higher incidence of LT‐dialysis (33%). Conclusion Overall, these data suggest there is a low incidence of long‐term dialysis dependence among survivors of VA‐ECMO support. Worries about the potential long‐term detrimental effect of VA‐ECMO should not preclude patients from receiving this life‐saving support.

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We sought to compare immediate postoperative invasive hemodynamics and the risk of RVF following two different surgical approaches: less invasive surgery (LIS) versus full sternotomy (FS). Methods:The study population comprised all 231 patients who underwent implantation of a HeartMate 3 (Abbott) LVAD at our institution from 2015 to 2020, utilizing an LIS (n = 161; 70%) versus FS (n = 70; 30%) surgical approach.Outcomes included postoperative invasive hemodynamic parameters, vasoactiveinotropic score (VIS), RVF during index hospitalization, and 6-month mortality.Results: Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. Multivariate analysis showed that LIS, compared with FS, was associated with the improved cardiac index (CI) at the sixth postoperative hour (p = .036) and similar CI at 24 h, maintained by lower VIS at both timepoints (p = .002). The LIS versus FS approach was also associated with a three-fold lower incidence of in-hospital severe RVF (8.7% vs. 28.6%, p < .001) and need for RVAD support (5.0% vs. 17.1%, p = .003), and with 68% reduction in the risk of 6-month mortality after LVAD implantation (Hazard ratio, 0.32; CI, 0.13-0.78; p = .012). Conclusion:Our findings suggest that LIS, compared with FS, is associated with a more favorable hemodynamic profile, as indicated by similar hemodynamic parameters maintained by lower vasoactive-inotropic support during the acute postoperative period. These findings were followed by a reduction in the risk of severe RVF and 6-month mortality in the LIS group.

Purpose A survival gap between weaning from venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and the hospital discharge has been consistently reported. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical features of patients who underwent successful VA-ECMO decannulation at our institution and to identify the major contributors responsible for adverse outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients supported with VA-ECMO in our institution between January 2013 and June 2020. Only patients that survived VA-ECMO and underwent successful decannulation were included and dichotomized based on survival to hospital discharge: non-survivors versus survivors. The primary study outcome was the cause of death after successful VA-ECMO decannulation. Results Of the 262 adult patients who underwent VA-ECMO decannulation, 72 (27.5%) patients did not survive to hospital discharge. Non-survivors were older (62 vs. 54 years, p < 0.001) and suffering from many pre-existing comorbidities. Pneumonia and sepsis were the most frequent infectious complication and almost twice as likely in non-survivors. Major causes of death were: cardiovascular (31.9%), infections (25.0%) and neurological (20.8%). The survival curve demonstrated that 51.4% of our patients died within 8 days after decannulation. Multivariate analysis identified older age, central venous cannulation, pulmonary bleeding and infection, dialysis after VA-ECMO, sepsis, and ischemic stroke (OR = 7.86, 95% CI: 2.76-2.43, p < 0.001) as factors significantly predisposing to patients’ death. Conclusion In our study, one-third of patients decannulated off VA-ECMO did not survive to hospital discharge due to end-stage heart failure, infections or neurological injury. The first 8 post-decannulation days were recognized as a critical period where thorough strategies to prevent acquired infections and cautious support of end-organ function should be warranted. Future large-scale trials are needed to confirm our results.

No abstract

We present the patient with severe aortic insufficiency (AI) 5 years post left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. His management was complicated with unsuccessful percutaneous aortic valve closure attempt, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) implantation with a severe paravalvular leak, eventual valve dislodgment into the left ventricle (LV), and LVAD inflow cannula occlusion. We utilized a mini-thoracotomy approach to successfully retrieve the dislodged valve through the LV apex while deploying a valve-in-valve TAVR under direct visualization and deep hypothermic cardiac arrest. This case can serve as an example of the serious pitfalls and potential resolution strategies when treating LVAD-associated AI.

No abstract