Twenty-one patients with pancreatic cancer pain were studied to evaluate the effectiveness of celiac plexus block (CPB) on pain relief and quality of life (QOL), compared to the traditional NSAID-morphine treatment. The criteria were morphine consumption, visual analogue pain scale (VAS), performance status (PS) determined by medical and nursing staffs, and answers to QOL questionnaires. Morphine consumption, VAS, PS, and self-assessed QOL scores were taken when the administration of morphine was necessary for pain relief and those scores were used as control. Morphine consumption and the VAS score were recorded at regular weekly intervals and the PS and QOL scores were measured every 2 weeks thereafter. CPB was performed within 2-3 days after the control measurement. The VAS scores of the patients receiving CPB (n = 10) were statistically lower for the first 4 weeks after the procedure than those of the patients receiving the standard NSAID-morphine treatment (n = 11) during the same time period after the control measurement. Morphine consumption was significantly lower in weeks 4-7 (inclusive) following the procedure in the CPB group and continued to be lower thereafter, though not significantly so. Although the PS score slightly improved at the 2nd week after CPB, it was not improved by the start of the NSAID-morphine treatment. Self-assessed QOL scores did not ameliorate statistically after CPB; however, they did deteriorate remarkably in the patients treated only with morphine-NSAID during their survival periods, while they deteriorated only slightly in the CPB group. There were fewer side effects after CPB. These results indicate CPB does not directly improve QOL in patients with pancreatic cancer pain, but it may prevent deterioration in QOL by the long-lasting analgesic effect, limitation of side effects and the reduction of morphine consumption, compared to treatment only with NSAID-morphine.

No abstract

In order to try to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of post-operative pain, this study was designed to psychophysically determine physiological and pharmacological characteristics of experimental pain induced by a 4-mm-long incision through the skin, fascia and muscle in the volar forearm of humans. In experiment 1, the subjects (n=8) were administered lidocaine systemically (a bolus injection of 2mg/kg for a period of 5 min followed by an intravenous infusion of 2mg/kg/h for another 40 min), and then the incision was made. In experiment 2, cumulative doses of lidocaine (0.5-2mg/kg) were systemically injected in the subjects (n=8) 30 min after the incision had been made, when primary and secondary hyperalgesia had fully developed. Spontaneous pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Primary hyperalgesia was defined as mechanical pain thresholds to von Frey hair stimuli (from 7 to 151 mN) in the injured area. The area of secondary hyperalgesia to punctate mechanical stimuli was assessed using a rigid von Frey hair (151 mN). Flare formation was assessed in the first experiment using a laser doppler imager (LDI). Pain perception was maximal when the incision was made and then rapidly disappeared within 30 min after the incision had been made. Primary hyperalgesia was apparent at 15 min after the incision had been made and remained for 2 days. The incision resulted in a relatively large area of flare formation immediately after the incision had been made. The area of flare began to shrink within 15 min and was limited to a small area around the injured area at 30 min after incision. Secondary hyperalgesia was apparent at 30 min after incision and persisted for 3h after incision and then gradually disappeared over the next 3h. In experiment 1, pre-traumatic treatment with systemic lidocaine suppressed primary hyperalgesia only during the first 1h after the incision had been made. The lidocaine suppressed the development of flare formation without affecting the pain rating when the incision was made. The development of secondary hyperalgesia continued to be suppressed after completion of the lidocaine infusion. In experiment 2, post-traumatic treatment with lidocaine temporarily suppressed primary as well as secondary hyperalgesia that had fully developed; however, the primary and secondary hyperalgesia again became apparent after completion of the lidocaine administration. These findings suggest that pre-traumatic treatment with lidocaine reduces the excessive inputs from the injured peripheral nerves, thus suppressing development of flare formation and secondary hyperalgesia through peripheral and central mechanisms, respectively. Pre-traumatic treatment with lidocaine would temporarily stabilize the sensitized nerves in the injured area, but the nerves would be sensitized after completion of the administration. Post-traumatic treatment with lidocaine reduced primary and secondary hyperalgesia that had fully developed. However, the finding that the suppressive effect of lidocaine on seconda...

Neuropathic pain following nerve injury is believed to involve excitatory amino acids (EAAs) and Ca2+-mediated neuronal plastic changes in the central nervous system (CNS). This study was designed to investigate the changes in glutamate and aspartate contents in the dorsal half of the spinal cord following chronic constrictive injury (CCI) of the rat common sciatic nerve. We also examined the changes in intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca2+]i) of the spinal dorsal horn in transverse spinal slices in the same animal model. Thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia were observed on day 2 and thereafter following CCI (P < 0.0001). In the CCI rats to which 0.5 mg/kg of i.p. MK-801 was given 30 min prior to CCI and subsequently three daily treatments with 0.5 mg/kg of i.p. MK-801, the development of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia was suppressed for a period of up to 7 days; however, hyperalgesia appeared on day 10 and day 14 (P < 0.001). In CCI rats, significant increases were observed in glutamate and aspartate contents on the ipsilateral side of the dorsal horn to nerve ligation on days 4, 7 and 14 (P < 0.001). Moreover, significant increases in [Ca2+]i in the spinal dorsal horn were also observed in the superficial (lamina I-II) and deep layers (lamina V-VI) on the ipsilateral side to nerve ligation on days 4, 7 and 14 after nerve ligation in the spinal slices (P < 0.0001). The treatment with i.p. MK-801 suppressed the increases in the contents of glutamate and aspartate and in [Ca2+]i on days 4 and 7. However, the ipsilateral contents of glutamate and aspartate significantly increased on day 14 (P < 0.001 and 0.003, respectively); the increased [Ca2+]i was also observed on day 14 (P < 0.001), and the spatial pattern of the increased regions was similar to untreated CCI rats. We interpret these results to indicate that neuropathic hyperalgesia induced by CCI in the rat is associated with an increase in glutamate and aspartate contents and the subsequent activation of NMDA receptors, followed by an increase in [Ca2+]i within dorsal horn of the spinal cord.

Pretraumatic injection of lidocaine reduces primary hyperalgesia more effectively than does posttraumatic injection, but only for a short period after incision. The spread of secondary hyperalgesia is mediated peripheral nerve fibers, but when secondary hyperalgesia has fully developed, it becomes less dependent on or even independent of peripheral neural activity originating from the injured site.

No abstract

No abstract

These results demonstrated that ketamine produced antinociceptive effects through an activation of the monoaminergic descending inhibitory system, whereas, in a unilateral peripheral inflammation-induced hyperalgesic state, the monoaminergic system did not contribute to the antihyperalgesic effects of ketamine. The mechanisms of the antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic properties of ketamine are different.