Background The effects that therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are not yet fully known. Therefore, we sought to determine whether COVID-19 vaccineinduced antibody responses were altered in patients with IBD on commonly used immunosuppressive drugs. Methods In this multicentre, prospective, case-control study (VIP), we recruited adults with IBD treated with one of six different immunosuppressive treatment regimens (thiopurines, infliximab, a thiopurine plus infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib) and healthy control participants from nine centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines (either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech], or mRNA1273 [Moderna]) 6-12 weeks apart (according to scheduling adopted in the UK). We measured antibody responses 53-92 days after a second vaccine dose using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted by age and vaccine type, and was analysed by use of multivariable linear regression models. This study is registered in the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN13495664, and is ongoing. Findings Between May 31 and Nov 24, 2021, we recruited 483 participants, including patients with IBD being treated with thiopurines (n=78), infliximab (n=63), a thiopurine plus infliximab (n=72), ustekinumab (n=57), vedolizumab (n=62), or tofacitinib (n=30), and 121 healthy controls. We included 370 participants without evidence of previous infection in our primary analysis. Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (156•8 U/mL [geometric SD 5•7]; p<0•0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (111•1 U/mL [5•7]; p<0•0001), or tofacitinib (429•5 U/mL [3•1]; p=0•0012) compared with controls (1578•3 U/mL [3•7]). There were no significant differences in antibody concentrations between patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy (1019•8 U/mL [4•3]; p=0•74), ustekinumab (582•4 U/mL [4•6]; p=0•11), or vedolizumab (954•0 U/mL [4•1]; p=0•50) and healthy controls. In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0•12, 95% CI 0•08-0•17; p<0•0001) and tofacitinib (0•43, 0•23-0•81; p=0•0095), but not with ustekinumab (0•69, 0•41-1•19; p=0•18), thiopurines (0•89, 0•64-1•24; p=0•50), or vedolizumab (1•16, 0•74-1•83; p=0•51). mRNA vaccines (3•68, 2•80-4•84; p<0•0001; vs adenovirus vector vaccines) were independently associated with higher antibody concentrations and older age per decade (0•79, 0•72-0•87; p<0•0001) with lower antibody concentrations. Interpretation For patients with IBD, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines varies according to immunosuppressive drug exposure, and is attenuated in recipie...

The persistent sciatic artery (PSA) is a rare but clinically significant congenital vascular anomaly. Clinical presentation varies and PSA can cause a number of complications, including limb loss. We describe the presenting features and treatments in two patients. The former was found to have thrombosis of a PSA with distal thromboemboli and was treated with a bypass graft. The latter was treated for an ischemic foot following successful ruptured aortic aneurysm repair and was found incidentally to have patent PSA with concomitant stenosis of the common iliac artery, which was successfully treated with stent grafting.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The odds of nondiagnostic biopsy increase for lesions closer to the diaphragm; however, the odds of pneumothorax are not significantly different.

No abstract

No abstract