AimsStrain artefacts are known to hamper the correct interpretation of segmental strain and strain-rate (S/SR). Defining the normal ranges of myocardial segmental deformation is important in clinical studies and routine echocardiographic practice. In order to define artefact-free normal ranges for segmental longitudinal S/SR parameters, we investigated the extent to which different types of artefacts and their segmental localisation in the three different myocardial layers created a bias in the results of echocardiographic strain measurements.MethodsThe study included echocardiograms from men and women aged 40–69 years from two population-based studies, namely the Know Your Heart study (Russia) and the Tromsø Study (Norway). Of the 2207 individuals from these studies, 840 had normal results, defined as the absence of hypertension or indicators of any cardiovascular disease. Two-dimensional (2D) global and segmental S/SR of the three myocardial layers were analysed using speckle tracking echocardiography. Artefacts were assessed with two different methods: visual identification of image-artefacts and a novel conceptual approach of ‘curve-artefacts’ or unphysiological strain-curve formation.ResultsSegmental strain values were found to have significantly reduced in the presence of strain-curve artefacts (14.9%±5.8% towards −20.7%±4.9%), and increased with the foreshortening of the 2D image. However, the individual global strain values were not substantially altered by discarding segmental artefacts. Reduction due to artefacts was observed in all segments, layers, systolic and diastolic strain, and SR. Thus, we presented normal ranges for basal-septal, basal, medial and apical segment groups after excluding artefacts.ConclusionStrain-curve artefacts introduce systematic errors, resulting in reduced segmental S/SR values. In terms of artefact-robust global longitudinal strain, the detection of curve-artefacts is crucial for the correct interpretation of segmental S/SR patterns. Intersegmental S/SR gradients and artefacts need to be considered for the correct definition of normalcy and pathology.
Background Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic functions are important cardiovascular risk predictors in patients with hypertension. However, data on segmental, layer‐specific strain, and diastolic strain rates in these patients are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate segmental two‐dimensional strain rate imaging (SRI)‐derived parameters to characterize LV systolic and diastolic function in hypertensive individuals compared with that in normotensive individuals. Methods The study sample comprised 1194 participants from the population‐based Know Your Heart study in Arkhangelsk and Novosibirsk, Russia, and 1013 individuals from the Seventh Tromsø Study in Norway. The study population was divided into four subgroups: (A) healthy individuals with normal blood pressure (BP), (B) individuals on antihypertensive medication with normal BP, (C) individuals with systolic BP 140–159 mmHg and/or diastolic BP > 90 mm HG, and (D) individuals with systolic BP ≥160 mmHg. In addition to conventional echocardiographic parameters, global and segmental layer‐specific strains and strain rates in early diastole and atrial contraction (SR E, SR A) were extracted. The strain and SR (S/SR) analysis included only segments without strain curve artifacts. Results With increasing BP, the systolic and diastolic global and segmental S/SR gradually decreased. SR E, a marker of impaired relaxation, showed the most distinctive differences between the groups. In normotensive controls and the three hypertension groups, all segmental parameters displayed apico‐basal gradients, with the lowest S/SR in the basal septal and highest in apical segments. Only SR A did not differ between the segmental groups but increased gradually with increasing BP. End‐systolic strain showed incremental epi‐towards endocardial gradients, irrespective of the study group. Conclusion Arterial hypertension reduces global and segmental systolic and diastolic left ventricular S/SR parameters. Impaired relaxation determined by SR E is the dominant factor of diastolic dysfunction, whereas end‐diastolic compliance (by SR A) does not seem to be influenced by different degrees of hypertension. Segmental strain, SR E and SR A provide new insights into the LV cardio mechanics in hypertensive hearts.
ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to assess changes in heart structure and function associated with heavy alcohol use by comparing echocardiographic indices in a population-based sample to those in patients admitted to an inpatient facility with severe alcohol problems.Methods and resultsWe used data from the Know Your Heart study (2015–2017) which is a cross-sectional study that recruited 2479 participants aged 35–69 years from the general population of the city of Arkhangelsk in Northwest Russia and 278 patients from the Arkhangelsk Regional Psychiatric Hospital with a primary diagnosis related to chronic alcohol use (narcology clinic subsample). The drinking patterns of the population-based sample were characterised in detail. We used regression models controlling for age, sex, smoking, education and waist to hip ratio to evaluate the differences in echocardiographic indices in participants with different drinking patterns. The means of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and indexed left atrial systolic diameter were increased among heavy drinkers (narcology clinic subsample), while mean left ventricular ejection fraction was decreased in this group compared with the population-based sample. In contrast, the harmful and hazardous drinkers in the population-based sample did not differ from non-problem drinkers with respect to echocardiographic indices of systolic and diastolic function.ConclusionsExtremely heavy drinking is associated with a specific set of structural and functional abnormalities of the heart that may be regarded as precursors of alcohol-related dilated cardiomyopathy.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Helse Nord HNF1458-19 Background Definition of normal ranges of myocardial segmental deformation are important in clinical studies and routine echocardiographic practice. It is known that artefacts hamper segmental strain and strain rate (S/SR) analysis. Purpose This study is based on a new approach for artefact detection. We intended to investigate to what degree different types of artefacts and their localization bias the result of measurements and to establish corrected normal ranges for segmental S/SR parameters. Methods The study is based on a collaboration project between the Russian cross-sectional study "Know your heart" and the Norwegian "Tromso-7" study. From 2207 participants we identified 840 individuals (511 females and 329 males, age range 40-79) with normal cardiac function by excluding left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, moderate or severe valvular heart disease, LV- dilatation, pulmonary hypertension, Q-waves and bundle branch block signs on ECG, high blood pressure, history of heart attack, use of antihypertensive drugs or high level of NT-proBNP. End-systolic longitudinal epi- myo- and endocardial strain and peak systolic SR and diastolic SR E and SR A were assessed for the calculation of segmental normal ranges. In addition to noise and foreshortening artefacts, we introduced a concept of "curve artefact" which can be defined as unphysiological strain curve shapes. Panel A of the figure shows examples of these curve artefacts, A: diastolic mismatch B: blunted curve, and C: floating curve. All strain curves were assessed for the presence of one of these unphysiological shapes and 2D images were visually assessed for the presence of noise, reverberations, or missing parts of the myocardium. Results The bar-chart for segmental strain demonstrates significantly reduced strain values at the presence of curve artefacts and increased strain at the presence of foreshortening. Normal ranges for basal septal, basal, medial, and apical segments excluding segments with artefacts and foreshortening are displayed in the table. The presence of curve artefacts matched the presence of noise or other 2D image artefacts in 88% of cases. Conclusions Strain artefacts result in systematically reduced peak-strain values. Thus, the detection and exclusion of curve artefacts seem to be an important measure for the correct interpretation of strain curves for a definition of normalcy and pathology. The selection of artefact-free strain curves reveals high strain and SR gradients increasing from epi to endocardial position and basal-septal towards apical segments. Abstract Figure. normal range Abstract Figure. artefacts
Background Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic functions are important cardiovascular risk predictors in patients with hypertension. However, data on segmental, layer-specific strain, and diastolic strain rates in these patients are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate segmental two-dimensional strain rate imaging (SRI)-derived parameters to characterize LV systolic and diastolic function in hypertensive individuals compared with that in normotensive individuals. Methods The study sample comprised 1194 participants from population studies in Arkhangelsk and Novosibirsk, Russia, and 1013 individuals from the Seventh Tromsø Study in Norway. The study population was divided into four subgroups: A. healthy individuals with normal blood pressure (BP), B. individuals on antihypertensive medication with normal BP, C. individuals with systolic BP 140–159 mmHg and/or diastolic BP >90 mm HG, and D. individuals with systolic BP ≥160 mmHg. In addition to conventional echocardiographic parameters, global and segmental layer-specific strains and strain rates in early diastole and atrial contraction (SR E, SR A) were extracted. The strain and SR (S/SR) analysis included only segments without strain curve artifacts. Results With increasing BP, the systolic and diastolic global and segmental S/SR gradually decreased. SR E, a marker of impaired relaxation, showed the most distinctive differences between the groups. In normotensive controls and the three hypertension groups, all segmental parameters displayed apico-basal gradients, with the lowest S/SR in the basal septal and highest in apical segments. Only SR A did not differ between the segmental groups but increased gradually with increasing BP. End-systolic strain showed incremental epi-towards endocardial gradients, irrespective of the study group. Conclusion Arterial hypertension reduces global and segmental systolic and diastolic left ventricular S/SR parameters. Impaired relaxation determined by SR E is the dominant factor of diastolic dysfunction, whereas end-diastolic compliance (by SR A) does not seem to be influenced by different degrees of hypertension. Segmental strain, SR E and SR A provide new insights into the LV cardiomechanics in hypertensive hearts.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Northern Norway Regional Health Authority Background It is known that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) display reduced global and regional strain and strain rate (SR). However, knowledge about segmental strain and SR in stable CAD patients is still limited. Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore whether segmental strain and SR analyses are different between patients with normal and stenotic coronary arteries among individuals with chest-pain. Methods A total of 510 patients with chest pain, referred to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and additional 102 patients with myocardial infarction (MI) were prospectively included. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with strain-rate analysis. All patients with CCTA-suspected CAD subsequently underwent invasive CAG, as well as in all MI patients. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and average for segmental peak longitudinal strain during systole (PLS), peak systolic strain rate (PLSR S), peak early diastolic strain rate (PLSR E), post systolic shortening (PSS) measurements were analysed. Further, different cut-off values for reduced strain and SR were used to define the percentage of functionally reduced segments between patients with normal CAD (no CAD), MI, and stable CAD patients who were further treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Results As shown in the table 1, all average segmental strain and SR parameters differed significantly between no CAD and MI groups. However, only PLSR E showed significant differences between no CAD and PCI groups . PLSR E, PLS and GLS showed significant differences between no CAD and CABG groups. The percentage of reduced segmental strain and SR showed similar results. Regarding the percentage of pathological segments at different cut-off values, PLSR E showed the most significant difference between these four groups at a cut-off value 1.5 (p < 0.001) (Figure 1). Conclusion Patients with MI or CABG display clearly reduced segmental strain and SR values. However, in patients with chest-pain, segmental PLSR E seemed to be the only indicator revealing subtle differences between patients with no CAD or those assigned to PCI. The diagnostic value of PLSR E needs to be investigated in further studies. Abstract Table 1 Abstract Figure 1
Background Noninvasive assessment of elevated filling pressure in the left ventricle (LV) remains an unresolved problem. Of the many echocardiographic parameters used to evaluate diastolic pressure, the left atrial strain and strain rate (LA S/SR) have shown promise in clinical settings. However, only a few previous studies have evaluated LA S/SR in larger populations. Methods A total of 2033 participants from Norwegian (Tromsø 7) and Russian (Know Your Heart) population studies, equally distributed by age and sex, underwent echocardiography, including atrial and ventricular S/SR and NT-proBNP measurements. Of these, 1069 were identified as healthy (without hypertension, atrial fibrillation (AF), or structural cardiac disease) and were used to define the age- and sex-adjusted normal ranges of LA S/SR. Furthermore, the total study population was divided into groups according to ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, EF <50%, and AF. In each group, uni- and multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to test LA and LV functional parameters as potential indicators of NT-proBNP levels above 250 ng/ml. Results The mean LA S/SR values in this study were higher than those in previous large studies, whereas the lower references were comparable. In normal hearts, atrial total strain (ATS) and mitral valve E deceleration time (MV DT) were independent factors indicating elevated NT-proBNP levels, whereas in hearts with reduced EFs, the independent indicators were peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) and LV stroke volume. The areas under the curve for these significant indicators to discriminate elevated NT-proBNP levels were 0.639 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.577-0.701) for normal EF and 0.805 (CI: 0.675-0.935) for reduced EF. Conclusion The results confirm good intrastudy reproducibility, with mean values in the upper range of previous meta-analyses. In the future automated border-detection algorithms may be able to generate highly reproducible normal values. Furthermore, the study showed atrial S/SR as an additional indicator of elevated NT-proBNP levels in the general population, demonstrating the incremental value of both ATS and PACS in addition to conventional and ventricular strain echocardiography. Thus, the LA S/SR may be regarded as an important addition to the multiparametric approach used for evaluating LV filling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.