words)Objective: The Covid-19 pandemic is rapidly spreading worldwide, notably in Europe and North America, where obesity is highly prevalent. The relation between obesity and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has not been fully documented.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we analyzed the relationship between clinical characteristics, including body mass index (BMI), and the requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in 124 consecutive patients admitted in intensive care for SARS-CoV-2, in a single French center.Results : Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) and severe obesity (BMI >35 kg/m2) were present in 47.6% and 28.2% of cases, respectively. Overall, 85 patients (68.6%) required IMV. The proportion of patients who required IMV increased with BMI categories (p<0.01, Chi square test for trend), and it was greatest in patients with BMI >35 kg/m 2 (85.7%). In multivariate logistic regression, the need for IMV was significantly associated with male sex (p<0.05) and BMI (p<0.05), independent of age, diabetes, and hypertension. The odds ratio for IMV in patients with BMI >35 kg/m 2 vs patients with BMI <25 kg/m 2 was 7. 36 (1.63-33.14; p=0.02) Conclusion: The present study showed a high frequency of obesity among patients admitted in intensive care for SARS-CoV-2. Disease severity increased with BMI. Obesity is a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 severity requiring increased attention to preventive measures in susceptible individuals. Accepted Article

The long-term outcome of allogenic islet transplantation is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 10-year outcome of islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness and/or a functioning kidney graft. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe enrolled in this prospective parallel-arm cohort study 28 subjects with type 1 diabetes who received islet transplantation either alone (ITA) or after a kidney graft (IAK). Islet transplantation consisted of two or three intraportal infusions of allogenic islets administered within (median [interquartile range]) 68 days . Immunosuppression was induced with interleukin-2 receptor antibodies and maintained with sirolimus and tacrolimus. The primary outcome was insulin independence with A1C £6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Secondary outcomes were patient and graft survival, severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs), metabolic control, and renal function. RESULTSThe primary outcome was met by (Kaplan-Meier estimates [95% CI]) 39% (22-57) and 28% (13-45) of patients 5 and 10 years after islet transplantation, respectively. Graft function persisted in 82% (62-92) and 78% (57-89) of case subjects after 5 and 10 years, respectively, and was associated with improved glucose control, reduced need for exogenous insulin, and a marked decrease of SHEs. ITA and IAK had similar outcomes. Primary graft function, evaluated 1 month after the last islet infusion, was significantly associated with the duration of graft function and insulin independence. CONCLUSIONSIslet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol can provide 10-year markedly improved metabolic control without SHEs in three-quarters of patients with type 1 diabetes, kidney transplanted or not.The demonstration in 2000 that b-cell replacement with allogenic islet transplantation could restore endogenous insulin secretion and near-normal glucose homeostasis was an important landmark for the treatment of type 1 diabetes (1). Since then, islet transplantation has been offered worldwide in .1,000 patients with type 1

Liver resection for HCA is safe. Presentation with hemorrhage was associated with larger tumor size. In males with a HCA >10 cm, a HCC should be suspected. In such situation, a preoperative biopsy is preferable and an oncological liver resection should be considered.

While either pancreas or pancreatic islet transplantation can restore endogenous insulin secretion in patients with diabetes, no beta-cell replacement strategies are recommended in the literature. For this reason, the aim of this national expert panel statement is to provide information on the different kinds of beta-cell replacement, their benefit-risk ratios and indications for each type of transplantation, according to type of diabetes, its control and association with end-stage renal disease. Allotransplantation requires immunosuppression, a risk that should be weighed against the risks of poor glycaemic control, diabetic lability and severe hypoglycaemia, especially in cases of unawareness. Pancreas transplantation is associated with improvement in diabetic micro- and macro-angiopathy, but has the associated morbidity of major surgery. Islet transplantation is a minimally invasive radiological or mini-surgical procedure involving infusion of purified islets via the hepatic portal vein, but needs to be repeated two or three times to achieve insulin independence and long-term functionality. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas after kidney transplantations should be proposed for kidney recipients with type 1 diabetes with no surgical, especially cardiovascular, contraindications. In cases of high surgical risk, islet after or simultaneously with kidney transplantation may be proposed. Pancreas, or more often islet, transplantation alone is appropriate for non-uraemic patients with labile diabetes. Various factors influencing the therapeutic strategy are also detailed in this report.

Background Previous studies unveiled a relation between the severity of COVID‐19 pneumonia and obesity. The aims of this multicenter retrospective cohort study were to disentangle the association of BMI and associated metabolic risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, current smoking) in critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled patients admitted in intensive care for COVID‐19, in 21 centers (Europe, Israel, USA) between 02/19/2020 and 05/19/2020. Primary and secondary outcomes were the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and 28‐day mortality. Results A total of 1,461 patients were enrolled, median(IQR) age was 64 years (40.9‐72.0); 73.2% males; BMI 28.1 kg/m 2 (25.4‐32.3); 1,080 patients (73.9%) required IMV; the 28‐day mortality estimate was 36.1% (95%CI, 33.0‐39.5). Adjusted mixed logistic regression model showed a significant linear relation between BMI and IMV: OR 1.27 (95%CI, 1.12‐1.45) per 5 kg/m 2 . Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model showed a significant association between BMI and mortality, which was only increased in obesity class III (≥40 kg/m 2 ) (HR 1.68 (95%CI 1.06‐2.64). Conclusion In critically ill COVID‐19 patients, we observed a linear association between BMI and the need for IMV, independent of other metabolic risk factors, and a non‐linear association between BMI and mortality risk. (NCT04391738).

: Major hepatectomy (MH) can lead to an increasing portal vein pressure (PVP) and to lesions of the hepatic parenchyma. Several reports have assessed the deleterious effect of a high posthepatectomy PVP on the postoperative course of MH. Thus, several surgical modalities of portal inflow modulation (PIM) have been described. As for pharmacological modalities, experimental studies showed a potential efficiency of Somatostatin to reduce PVP and flow. To our knowledge, no previous clinical reports of PIM using somatostatin are available. Herein, we report the results of PIM using somatostatin in 10 patients who underwent MH with post-hepatectomy PVP > 20 mmHg. Our results suggest Somatostatin could be considered as an efficient reversible PIM when PVP decrease is above 2.5 mmHg.

Am J Transplant. 2018;18:945-951. amjtransplant.com | 945

Context The Igls criteria were developed to provide a consensus definition for outcomes of β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes during a January 2017 workshop sponsored by the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) and the European Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (EPITA). In July 2019, a symposium at the 17 th IPITA World Congress was held to examine the Igls criteria after two years in clinical practice, including validation against continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose targets, and to propose future refinements that would allow for comparison of outcomes with artificial pancreas system approaches. Evidence acquisition Utilization of the criteria in various clinical and research settings were illustrated by population as well as individual outcome data of four islet and/or pancreas transplant centers. Validation against CGM metrics was conducted in 55 islet transplant recipients followed-up to 10 years from a fifth center. Evidence synthesis The Igls criteria provided meaningful clinical assessment on an individual patient and treatment group level, allowing for comparison both within and between different β-cell replacement modalities. Important limitations include the need to account for changes in insulin requirements and C-peptide levels relative to baseline. In islet transplant recipients, CGM glucose time-in-range improved with each category of increasing β-cell graft function. Conclusions Future Igls 2.0 criteria should consider absolute rather than relative levels of insulin use and C-peptide as qualifiers with treatment success based on glucose assessment using CGM-metrics on par with assessment of HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia events.