IntroductionHyperemesis gravidarum is the most common reason for hospitalization in early pregnancy in pregnancies resulting in delivery. Several associative factors indicate that the etiology is likely to be multifactorial. To assess this, we used a unique procedure to compare hyperemetic pregnancies with non‐hyperemetic pregnancies both in different women and in the same women's different pregnancies.Material and methodsData about all pregnancies resulting in delivery in Finland in 2005‐2017 were retrieved from healthcare registers. Women who had a diagnosis of hyperemesis gravidarum in any pregnancy in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register were chosen as cases (n = 9315) and other women (n = 428 150) as the reference group. The incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum was calculated and associations between hyperemesis and maternal, environmental and pregnancy‐related factors were analyzed in a novel setting by comparing case women's pregnancies diagnosed with hyperemesis to (1) reference group women's pregnancies and (2) case women's non‐hyperemetic pregnancies.ResultsOf the 437 465 women who had at least one pregnancy resulting in delivery during the study period, 9315 women had at least one hyperemetic pregnancy. The total number of pregnancies resulting in delivery was 741 387 and 9549 of those were diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum; thus the incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum was 1.3%. In comparison (1), case women's hyperemetic pregnancies vs reference group's pregnancies, younger maternal age, higher gravidity, underweight and overweight were associated with increased risk of hyperemesis; in contrast, in comparison (2), case women's hyperemetic pregnancies vs their non‐hyperemetic pregnancies, higher age and obesity were associated with higher risk of hyperemesis, whereas the risk was lower as gravidity and parity increased. In both comparisons, smoking was associated with lower risk, whereas higher municipality population, assisted reproductive technology, multiple gestation and female sex of the fetus were associated with increased risk of hyperemesis.ConclusionsOur novel study setting provided new insights about risk factors: hyperemetic pregnancies differ both from pregnancies of women who had never been diagnosed with hyperemesis and from hyperemetic women's non‐hyperemetic pregnancies. The incidence of hyperemesis gravidarum in Finland was comparable to that in other countries.
Purpose To examine whether personal history of nausea or history of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) in relatives are risk factors for a woman to suffer from NVP. Further, to evaluate if these factors are associated with the severity of NVP. Methods Cohort study of 2411 pregnant women recruited from maternity health care clinics. The severity of NVP was categorized according to Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis (PUQE) questionnaire into no/mild/moderate/severe NVP. History of nausea was assessed in connection with motion sickness, seasickness, migraine or other kinds of headache, after anesthesia, related to the use of contraceptives, and other kinds of nausea. History of NVP in relatives was categorized into first-degree (mother/sister) and second-degree relatives (more distant). Results In multivariable analysis including previous personal history of nausea, motion sickness (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.81-5.56, p < 0.0001) and nausea in migraine (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.86-5.45, p < 0.0001) were associated with severe NVP. History of nausea in other kinds of headache was associated with moderate NVP (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.34-2.72, p = 0.001). Women with affected first-degree relatives had higher odds for moderate (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.72-5.40) and severe (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.92-5.28) NVP (p < 0.0001). All these results remained significant after adjusting for parity, body mass index, smoking, employment and age. Conclusion Women with personal history of nausea or family history of NVP have an increased susceptibility of NVP. This information is useful in pre-pregnancy counselling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.