The

No abstract

A structural analysis of river phytoplankton has been carried out based upon published studies on 67 rivers. When available on a yearly basis to account for seasonal variability, five structural features have been chosen: species composition, species richness, species dominance, diversity and biomass (total and per taxonomic groups). Despite the high number of reported studies, most of them cover only some of the aforementioned features. As a result of the low amount of studies, tropical rivers are underepresented. No size distribution studies have been carried out on river phytoplankton. The average species richness amounts to 126, being higher in temperate rivers. Roughly one half of each flora is comprised of sporadic species. No statistically significant relationship between species richness and latitude has been found despite the fact that tropical rivers appear to house fewer species than temperate rivers. Also, one half of the support in the floras are either benthic or tychoplanktonic. Diatoms comprise the majority of species numbers in the whole data set but are substituted by desmids in tropical rivers and by green algae when benthic species are not taken into account. There appears to be lower biomass in river phytoplankton than in lakes. Diatoms are also the major taxonomic group comprising total biomass in rivers but they share clearly a lower fraction in tropical rivers. On an average basis, diatoms appear to be more dominant in rivers than in lakes. The time course of diatom dominance occurs close to the summer solstice in tropical rivers whereas is much more lagged in temperate sites. The diversity of river phytoplankton is highly scattered (0.40-4.40 bits ind-').

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Phytoplankton species groups were studied in a eutrophic reservoir at different time scales (daily, weekly, monthly and yearly) . Four strategic groups along the r-K continuum were defined and their seasonal time courses were followed . Their temporal distribution of relative biomass reflected resource partitioning because each strategic group dominated the phytoplankton community at different times in the year. However, the relationships between strategic groups changed with the time scale involved . At the daily scale an inverse relationship between rand K-groups occurred whereas at supradaily scales such relationships did not hold . Species groups reflected strategic groups . No relationship between population growth and losses was found, suggesting that both were not counterbalanced . In the long term (supraannual) the phytoplankton community changed very much in this reservoir, its ecological memory being small as compared with that of lakes .

The provisions of Connell's Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) were investigated in relation to the behaviour of freshwater phytoplankton in a hypertrophic lagoon, paying special attention to the link between species-diversity and environmental disturbances. Phytoplankton diversity yielded different indices depending on the basic unit of calculations (cells, particles, phytoplankton units, biomass). Although their ranges were approximately equal, they did not covary so could not be considered mutually substitutable. For the purpose of IDH testing, biomass diversity was chosen.Equilibrium states were considered to obtain in those periods with a very high fraction of total phytoplankton biomass, shared by no more than three phytoplankton species. Disturbances were considered as counterparts of equilibrium states. Disturbance factors were mostly abiotic, environmental features of the lake operating on the phytoplankton community at different time scales (co-occurring and with l-and 2-weeks' lags). These scales may relate to the time required to establish phytoplankton community structure.IDH could be suspected not to hold for the phytoplankton of this hypertrophic lake, which experienced seven near-equilibrium phases and six disturbance periods throughout the study. As a rule, equilibrium states lasted longer than disturbance periods. The expected relationships between both disturbance intensity or frequency were not shown. Furthermore, no relationship was demonstrated between diversity (and hence IDH) and the phytoplankton community change rate. Wind stress probably played a minor role in triggering disturbance events. Disturbances were shown partly to promote small-sized phytoplankton communities.Finally, a plea for studying hypertrophic phytoplankton in greater detail is stressed if its responses to disturbances are to be fully understood.