The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has multiple Spike (S) protein mutations that contribute to escape from the neutralizing antibody responses, and reducing vaccine protection from infection. The extent to which other components of the adaptive response such as T cells may still target Omicron and contribute to protection from severe outcomes is unknown. We assessed the ability of T cells to react with Omicron spike in participants who were vaccinated with Ad26.CoV2.S or BNT162b2, and in unvaccinated convalescent COVID-19 patients (n = 70). We found that 70-80% of the CD4 and CD8 T cell response to spike was maintained across study groups. Moreover, the magnitude of Omicron cross-reactive T cells was similar to that of the Beta and Delta variants, despite Omicron harbouring considerably more mutations. Additionally, in Omicron-infected hospitalized patients (n = 19), there were comparable T cell responses to ancestral spike, nucleocapsid and membrane proteins to those found in patients hospitalized in previous waves dominated by the ancestral, Beta or Delta variants (n = 49). These results demonstrate that despite Omicron's extensive mutations and reduced susceptibility to neutralizing antibodies, the majority of T cell response, induced by vaccination or natural infection, cross-recognises the variant. Well-preserved T cell immunity to Omicron is likely to contribute to protection from severe COVID-19, supporting early clinical observations from South Africa.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant, which exhibits high level neutralization resistance, has since evolved into several sub-lineages including BA.4 and BA.5, which have dominated the fifth wave of infection in South Africa. Here we assessed the sensitivity of BA.4 to neutralization and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in convalescent donors infected with four previous variants of SARS-CoV-2, as well as in post-vaccination breakthrough infections (BTIs) caused by Delta or BA.1. We confirm that BA.4 shows high level resistance to neutralization, regardless of the infecting variant. However, breakthrough infections, which trigger potent neutralization, retained activity against BA.4, albeit at reduced titers. Fold reduction of neutralization in BTIs was lower than that seen in unvaccinated convalescent donors, suggesting maturation of neutralizing responses to become more resilient against VOCs in hybrid immunity. BA.4 sensitivity to ADCC was reduced but remained detectable in both convalescent donors and in BTIs. Overall, the high neutralization resistance of BA.4, even to antibodies from BA.1 infections, provides an immunological mechanism for the rapid spread of BA.4 immediately after a BA.1-dominated wave. Furthermore, although ADCC activity against BA.4 was reduced, residual activity may nonetheless contribute to the protection from disease.

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) differentially trigger neutralizing antibodies with variable cross-neutralizing capacity. Here we show that unlike SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1, which triggered neutralizing antibodies with limited cross-reactivity, BA.4/5 infection triggers highly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies. Cross-reactivity was observed both in the absence of prior vaccination and also in breakthrough infections following vaccination. This suggests that next-generation vaccines incorporating BA.4, which is spreading globally, might result in enhanced neutralization breadth.