HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

BackgroundMorphine is commonly used to treat chest pain during myocardial infarction, but its effect on cardiovascular outcome has never been directly evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the effect and safety of morphine in patients with acute anterior ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction followed up for 1 year.Methods and ResultsWe used the database of the CIRCUS (Does Cyclosporine Improve Outcome in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients) trial, which included 969 patients with anterior ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, admitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Two groups were defined according to use of morphine preceding coronary angiography. The composite primary outcome was the combined incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and stroke during 1 year. A total of 554 (57.1%) patients received morphine at first medical contact. Both groups, with and without morphine treatment, were comparable with respect to demographic and periprocedural characteristics. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between patients who received morphine compared with those who did not (26.2% versus 22.0%, respectively; P=0.15). The all‐cause mortality was 5.3% in the morphine group versus 5.8% in the no‐morphine group (P=0.89). There was no difference between groups in infarct size as assessed by the creatine kinase peak after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (4023±118 versus 3903±149 IU/L; P=0.52).ConclusionsIn anterior ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention, morphine was used in half of patients during initial management and was not associated with a significant increase in major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year.

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to develop a standardized and global bench test protocol to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the most currently used drug-eluting coronary stents.Background: The use of coronary stents has contributed to the reduction of cardiovascular mortality but can be associated with specific complications. Improving the biomechanical matching between the stents and the coronary anatomy may reduce these complications. Methods:We assessed five commercially available drug-eluting stents: the Absorb, Orsiro, Resolute Onyx, Synergy, and Xience Alpine stents. Following stent deployment at nominal pressure in ambient air, radial elastic recoil and foreshortening were measured. Flexibility (crimped and deployed stents) and longitudinal and radial resistances were evaluated using a mechanical tester.Results: Biomechanical characteristics were significantly different for all tested devices (ANOVA, P < 0.01). The Synergy, Orsiro, and Xience Alpine stents presented the lowest elastic recoil. The Synergy and Resolute Onyx stents were the most flexible devices. The Xience Alpine and Absorb stents had the highest longitudinal and radial resistances.Conclusions: Drug-eluting coronary stents used in current clinical practice have very different biomechanical characteristics, which should be taken into consideration to select the most appropriate device for each clinical situation. K E Y W O R D Sbench test, biomechanical performance, scoronary stents

Background A reduction of admission for MI has been reported in most countries affected by COVID-19. No clear explanation has been provided. Methods To report the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) admission during COVID-19 pandemic and in particular during national lockdown in two unequally affected French provinces (10-million inhabitants) with a different media strategy, and to describe the magnitude of MI incidence changes relative to the incidence of COVID-19-related deaths. A longitudinal study to collect all MIs from January 1 until May 17, 2020 (study period) and from the identical time period in 2019 (control period) was conducted in all centers with PCI-facilities in northern “Hauts-de-France” province and western “Pays-de-la-Loire” Province. The incidence of COVID-19 fatalities was also collected. Findings In “Hauts-de-France”, during lockdown (March 18–May 10), 1500 COVID-19-related deaths were observed. A 23% decrease in MI-IR (IRR=0.77;95%CI:0.71–0.84, p <0.001) was observed for a loss of 272 MIs (95%CI:−363,−181), representing 18% of COVID-19-related deaths. In “Pays-de-la-Loire”, 382 COVID-19-related deaths were observed. A 19% decrease in MI-IR (IRR=0.81; 95%CI=0.73–0.90, p <0.001) was observed for a loss of 138 MIs (95%CI:−210,−66), representing 36% of COVID-19-related deaths. While in “Hauts-de-France” the MI decline started before lockdown and recovered 3 weeks before its end, in “Pays-de-la-Loire”, it started after lockdown and recovered only by its end. In-hospital mortality of MI patients was increased during lockdown in both provinces (5.0% vs 3.4%, p =0.02). Interpretation It highlights one of the potential collateral damages of COVID-19 outbreak on cardiovascular health with a dramatic reduction of MI incidence. It advocates for a careful and weighted communication strategy in pandemic crises. Funding The study was conducted without external funding.