Using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), reference genes are utilized as endogenous controls for relative quantification of target genes in gene profiling studies. The suitability of housekeeping genes for that purpose in prostate cancer tissue has not been sufficiently investigated so far. The objective of this study was to select from a panel of 16 potential candidate reference genes the most stable genes for gene normalization. Expression of mRNA encoding ACTB, ALAS1, ALB, B2M, G6PD, GAPD, HMBS, HPRT1, K-ALPHA-1, POLR2A, PPIA, RPL13A, SDHA, TBP, UBC, and YWHAZ was examined in matched, microdissected malignant and nonmalignant tissue specimens obtained from 17 nontreated prostate carcinomas after radical prostatectomy by real-time RT-PCR. The genes studied displayed a wide expression range with cycle threshold values between 16 and 37. The expression was not different between samples from pT2 and pT3 tumors or between samples with Gleason scores <7 and >or=7 (P>0.05). ACTB, RPL13A, and HMBS showed significant differences (P<0.02 at least) in expressions between malignant and nonmalignant pairs. All other genes did not differ between the matched pairs, and the software programs geNorm and NormFinder were used to ascertain the most suitable reference genes from these candidates. HPRT1, ALAS1, and K-ALPHA-1 were calculated by both programs to be the most stable genes covering a broad range of expression. The expression of the target gene RECK normalized with HRPT1 alone and with the normalization factors generated by the combination of these three reference genes as well as with the unstable genes ACTB or RPL13A is given. That example shows the significance of using suitable reference genes to avoid erroneous normalizations in gene profiling studies for prostate cancer. The use of HPRT1 alone as a reference gene shown in our study was sufficient, but the normalization factors generated from two (HRPT1, ALAS1) or all three genes (HRPT1, ALAS1, K-ALPHA-1) should be considered for an improved reliability of normalization in gene profiling studies of prostate cancer.
Purpose: CD24 is a cell adhesion molecule that has been implicated in metastatic tumor progression of various solid tumors. We aimed to clarify the expression patterns of CD24 in colorectal cancer and to correlate these to clinicopathologic variables including patient survival. Experimental Design: 147 colorectal carcinomas and two colon carcinoma cell lines were immunostained for CD24. Cytoplasmic and membranous immunoreactivity were semiquantitatively scored. Fisher's exact test, m 2 test for trends, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox's regression were applied. Results: The cell line CX-2 showed only a minimal membranous CD24 immunoreactivity, in contrast to HT29, which stained strongly in the cytoplasm. In colorectal cancer, 68.7% of the tumors showed membranous CD24 staining, whereas 84.4% showed cytoplasmic staining. In 10% of cases, an exceptionally strong cytoplasmic CD24 expression was observed. The latter significantly correlated to higher tumor stages (Dukes and pT), nodal or systemic metastasis, and higher tumor grade. In survival analysis, strong cytoplasmic CD24 expression correlated significantly (Cox's regression: P = 0.012, relative risk = 3.7) to shortened patient survival in the group of cases without distant metastases. Conclusions: CD24 is commonly up-regulated in colorectal cancer and is a new independent prognostic marker which corroborates the importance of CD24 in tumor progression of this disease.Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of death from cancer in both sexes in the western world and its high incidence has been stable in the last 20 years (1). Although this disease is surgically curable in early stages, the tumor frequently does not become symptomatic before the metastatic stage, which is associated with high mortality. Therefore, increasing efforts are being made to develop more effective screening and prevention strategies for colorectal cancer and to enhance our capabilities to predict the clinical outcome. Currently, the most important conventional prognostic factors for patient survival are histologic tumor grade and tumor stage at time of diagnosis [pathologic tumornode-metastasis (Unio Internationale Contra Cancrum), Astler-Coller or Dukes], including depth of tumor invasion, involvement of regional lymph nodes, and metastatic spread to distant organs. In addition to these clinicopathologic variables, molecular markers are being evaluated and established for a wide variety of tumors including colon cancer (2). These new markers are being examined for their diagnostic and prognostic effect or even therapeutic implications. In previous works, we have described CD24 as a new prognostic marker in solid tumors (3 -6). Recently, CD24 has been shown to be a prognostic marker in gastric adenocarcinoma (7). CD24 is a small, heavily glycosylated, mucin-like cell surface protein (8 -10). It is expressed in various developing cells including pre-B-cells, keratinocytes, and renal tubulus epithelium, and also in a large variety of malignancies (for a comprehensive revie...
Purpose:We aimed to evaluate the expression of the human anterior gradient-2 (AGR2) in breast cancer on RNA and protein level and to correlate it with clinicopathologic data, including patient survival. Experimental Design: AGR2 mRNA expression was assessed by reverse transcription-PCR in 25 breast cancer samples and normal tissues. A polyclonal rabbit AGR antiserum was used for immunohistochemistry on 155 clinicopathologically characterized cases. Statistical analyses were applied to test for prognostic and diagnostic associations. Results: Immunohistochemical detection of AGR2 was statistically significantly associated with positive estrogen receptor status and lower tumor grade. AGR2-positive tumors showed significantly longer overall survival times in univariate analyses. For the subgroup of nodal-negative tumors, an independent prognostic value of AGR2 was found. Conclusions: The expression of AGR2 in breast cancer is strongly associated with markers of tumor differentiation (estrogen receptor positivity, lower tumor grade). A prognostic effect of AGR2 for overall survival could be shown, which became independently significant for the group of nodal-negative tumors.
The data suggest that strong cytoplasmic ALCAM expression in primary breast cancer, as detected by immunohistochemistry, might be a new marker for a more aggressive breast cancer biology.
Human kallikrein 14 (KLK14) is a steroid hormone-regulated member of the tissue kallikrein family of serine proteases, for which a prognostic and diagnostic value in breast cancer has been suggested. To further characterise the value of KLK14 as a breast tumour marker, we have carefully analysed KLK14 expression in normal breast tissue and breast cancer both on the RNA level by real-time RT-PCR (n ¼ 39), and on the protein level (n ¼ 127) using a KLK14-specific antibody for immunohistochemistry. We correlated KLK14 protein expression data with available clinico-pathological parameters (mean follow-up time was 55 months) including patient prognosis. KLK14 RNA expression as quantified by real-time RT-PCR was significantly more abundant in breast tumours compared to normal breast tissue (P ¼ 0.027), an issue that had not been clarified recently. Concordantly with the RNA data, cytoplasmic KLK14 protein expression was significantly higher in invasive breast carcinomas compared to normal breast tissues (P ¼ 0.003). Furthermore, KLK14 protein expression was associated with higher tumour grade (P ¼ 0.041) and positive nodal status (P ¼ 0.045) but was not significantly associated with shortened disease-free or overall patient survival time in univariate analyses. We conclude that KLK14 is clearly overexpressed in breast cancer in comparison to normal breast tissues and is positively associated with conventional parameters of tumour aggressiveness, but due to a missing association with survival times, the use of KLK14 immunohistochemistry as a prognostic marker in breast cancer is questionable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.