A solid understanding of physiology is beneficial in optimizing drug delivery and in the development of clinically predictive models of drug disposition kinetics. Although an abundance of data exists in the literature, it is often confounded by the use of various experimental methods and a lack of consensus in values from different sources. To help address this deficiency, we sought to directly compare three important vascular parameters at the tissue level using the same experimental approach in both mice and rats. Interstitial volume, vascular volume, and blood flow were radiometrically measured in selected harvested tissues of both species by extracellular marker infusion, red blood cell labeling, and rubidium chloride bolus distribution, respectively. The latter two parameters were further compared by whole-body autoradiographic imaging. An overall good interspecies agreement was observed for interstitial volume and blood flow on a weight-normalized basis in most tissues. In contrast, the measured vascular volumes of most rat tissues were higher than for mouse. Mice and rats, the two most commonly utilized rodent species in translational drug development, should not be considered as interchangeable in terms of vascular volume per gram of tissue. This will be particularly critical in biodistribution studies of drugs, as the amount of drug in the residual blood of tissues is often not negligible, especially for biologic drugs (e.g., antibodies) having long circulation half-lives. Physiologically based models of drug pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics also rely on accurate knowledge of biological parameters in tissues. For tissue parameters with poor interspecies agreement, the significance and possible drivers are discussed.
Identification of clinically predictive models of disposition kinetics for antibody therapeutics is an ongoing pursuit in drug development. To encourage translation of drug candidates from early research to clinical trials, clinical diagnostic agents may be used to characterize antibody disposition in physiologically relevant preclinical models. TechneScan PYP was employed to measure tissue vascular volumes (V(v)) in healthy mice. Two methods of red blood cell (RBC) labeling were compared: a direct in vivo method that is analogous to a clinical blood pool imaging protocol, and an indirect method in which radiolabeled blood was transfused from donor mice into recipient mice. The indirect method gave higher precision in RBC labeling yields, lower V(v) values in most tissues, and lower (99m)Tc uptake in kidneys and bladder by single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging relative to the direct method. Furthermore, the relative influence of each method on the calculated area under the first 7 days of the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-7)) of an IgG in nude mice was assessed using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. The model was sensitive to the source of V(v) values, whether obtained from the literature or measured by either method, when used to predict experimental AUC(0-7) values for radiolabeled trastuzumab in healthy murine tissues. In summary, a novel indirect method for preclinical determination of V(v) offered higher precision in RBC labeling efficiency and lower renal uptake of (99m)Tc than the direct method. In addition, these observations emphasize the importance of obtaining accurate physiological parameter values for modeling antibody uptake.
BackgroundThe identification of clinically meaningful and predictive models of disposition kinetics for cancer therapeutics is an ongoing pursuit in drug development. In particular, the growing interest in preclinical evaluation of anti-angiogenic agents alone or in combination with other drugs requires a complete understanding of the associated physiological consequences.Methodology/Principal FindingsTechnescan™ PYP™, a clinically utilized radiopharmaceutical, was used to measure tissue vascular volumes in beige nude mice that were naïve or administered a single intravenous bolus dose of a murine anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibody (10 mg/kg) 24 h prior to assay. Anti-VEGF had no significant effect (p>0.05) on the fractional vascular volumes of any tissues studied; these findings were further supported by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging. In addition, apart from a borderline significant increase (p = 0.048) in mean hepatic blood flow, no significant anti-VEGF-induced differences were observed (p>0.05) in two additional physiological parameters, interstitial fluid volume and the organ blood flow rate, measured using indium-111-pentetate and rubidium-86 chloride, respectively. Areas under the concentration-time curves generated by a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model changed substantially (>25%) in several tissues when model parameters describing compartmental volumes and blood flow rates were switched from literature to our experimentally derived values. However, negligible changes in predicted tissue exposure were observed when comparing simulations based on parameters measured in naïve versus anti-VEGF-administered mice.Conclusions/SignificanceThese observations may foster an enhanced understanding of anti-VEGF effects in murine tissues and, in particular, may be useful in modeling antibody uptake alone or in combination with anti-VEGF.
1. Modern high-throughput small molecule drug discovery requires rapid screening of the pharmacokinetic parameters of multiple candidate molecules in parallel. The mouse is often used for such screening, as are solvent-based intravenous formulations. Despite this, the intravenous toxicity of many commonly used solvents is unknown. The purpose of this investigation is to establish recommended no-observed-effect level (NOEL) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for several commonly used intravenous solvents in the CD-1 mouse. 2. The acute tolerability of polyethylene glycol 400, N-methylpyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol, dimethylacetamide and propylene glycol was established, along with combinations of polyethylene glycol 400 and/or ethanol and DMSO. Based on these data, an acute NOEL and recommended MTD is reported for each solvent or solvent combination. 3. These data can guide the use of these solvents to support single-dose intravenous pharmacokinetic studies in mice. By establishing a defined dose tolerability range for the most commonly used intravenous solvents, undue pain and distress in animals can be avoided while maximizing the generation of critical pharmacokinetic data for project teams.
ABSTRACT:3A5 is a novel antibody that binds repeated epitopes within CA125, an ovarian tumor antigen that is shed into the circulation. Binding to shed antigen may limit the effectiveness of therapeutic antibodies because of unproductive immune complex (IC) formation and/or altered antibody distribution. To evaluate this possibility, we characterized the impact of shed CA125 on the in vivo distribution of 3A5. In vitro, 3A5 and CA125 were found to form ICs in a concentration-dependent manner. This phenomenon was then evaluated in vivo using quantitative whole-body autoradiography to assess the tissue distribution of 125 I-3A5 in an orthotopic OVCAR-3 tumor mouse model at different stages of tumor burden. Low doses of 3A5 (75 g/kg) and pathophysiological levels of shed CA125 led to the formation of ICs in vivo that were rapidly distributed to the liver. Under these conditions, increased clearance of 3A5 from normal tissues was observed in mice bearing CA125-expressing tumors. Of importance, despite IC formation, 3A5 uptake by tumors was sustained over time. At a therapeutically relevant dose of 3A5 (3.5 mg/kg), IC formation was undetectable and distribution to normal tissues followed that of blood. In contrast, increased levels of radioactivity were observed in the tumors. These data demonstrate that CA125 and 3A5 do form ICs in vivo and that the liver is involved in their uptake. However, at therapeutic doses of 3A5 and clinically relevant CA125 levels, IC formation consumes only a minor fraction of 3A5, and tumor targeting seems to be unaffected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.