Repeat tumor biopsies to study genomic changes during therapy are difficult, invasive and data are confounded by tumoral heterogeneity. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can provide a non-invasive approach to assess prognosis and the genetic evolution of tumors in response to therapy. Mutation-specific droplet digital PCR was used to measure plasma concentrations of oncogenic BRAF and NRAS variants in 48 patients with advanced metastatic melanoma prior to treatment with targeted therapies (vemurafenib, dabrafenib or dabrafenib/trametinib combination) or immunotherapies (ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Baseline ctDNA levels were evaluated relative to treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor-associated ctDNA was detected in the plasma of 35/48 (73%) patients prior to treatment and lower ctDNA levels at this time point were significantly associated with response to treatment and prolonged PFS, irrespective of therapy type. Levels of ctDNA decreased significantly in patients treated with MAPK inhibitors (p < 0.001) in accordance with response to therapy, but this was not apparent in patients receiving immunotherapies. We show that circulating NRAS mutations, known to confer resistance to BRAF inhibitors, were detected in 3 of 7 (43%) patients progressing on kinase inhibitor therapy. Significantly, ctDNA rebound and circulating mutant NRAS preceded radiological detection of progressive disease. Our data demonstrate that ctDNA is a useful biomarker of response to kinase inhibitor therapy and can be used to monitor tumor evolution and detect the early appearance of resistance effectors.

BackgroundCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a measure of tumour burden and a useful tool for non-invasive monitoring of cancer. However, ctDNA is not always detectable in patients at time of diagnosis of metastatic disease. Therefore, there is a need to understand the correlation between ctDNA levels and the patients’ overall metabolic tumour burden (MTB).MethodsThirty-two treatment naïve metastatic melanoma patients were included in the study. MTB and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) was measured by 18F-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT). Plasma ctDNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).ResultsCtDNA was detected in 23 of 32 patients. Overall, a significant correlation was observed between ctDNA levels and MTB (p < 0.001). CtDNA was not detectable in patients with an MTB of ≤10, defining this value as the lower limit of tumour burden that can be detected through ctDNA analysis by ddPCR.ConclusionsWe showed that ctDNA levels measured by ddPCR correlate with MTB in treatment naïve metastatic melanoma patients and observed a limit in tumour size for which ctDNA cannot be detected in blood. Nevertheless, our findings support the use of ctDNA as a non-invasive complementary modality to functional imaging for monitoring tumour burden.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4637-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for the management of uveal melanoma (UM). Patients and Methods Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing was used to determine somatic chromosomal copy number alterations (SCNAs) in primary UM tumors, ctDNA, and whole-genome amplified CTCs. CTCs were immunocaptured using an antimelanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate antibody conjugated to magnetic beads and immunostained for melanoma antigen recognised by T cells 1 (MART1)/glycoprotein 100 (gp100)/S100 calcium-binding protein β (S100β). ctDNA was quantified using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assay for mutations in the GNAQ, GNA11, PLCβ4, and CYSLTR2 genes. Results SCNA analysis of CTCs and ctDNA isolated from a patient with metastatic UM showed good concordance with the enucleated primary tumor. In a cohort of 30 patients with primary UM, CTCs were detected in 58% of patients (one to 37 CTCs per 8 mL of blood), whereas only 26% of patients had detectable ctDNA (1.6 to 29 copies/mL). The presence of CTCs or ctDNA was not associated with tumor size or other prognostic markers. However, the frequent detection of CTCs in patients with early-stage UM supports a model in which CTCs can be used to derive tumor-specific SCNA relevant for prognosis. Monitoring of ctDNA after treatment of the primary tumor allowed detection of metastatic disease earlier than 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in two patients. Conclusion The presence of CTCs in localized UM can be used to ascertain prognostic SCNA, whereas ctDNA can be used to monitor patients for early signs of metastatic disease. This study paves the way for the analysis of CTCs and ctDNA as a liquid biopsy that will assist with treatment decisions in patients with UM.

Background PD‐1 inhibitors are routinely used for the treatment of advanced melanoma. This study sought to determine whether PD‐L1 expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can serve as a predictive biomarker of clinical benefit and response to treatment with the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab. Methods Blood samples were collected from patients with metastatic melanoma receiving pembrolizumab, prior to treatment and 6–12 weeks after initiation of therapy. Multiparametric flow cytometry was used to identify CTCs and evaluate the expression of PD‐L1. Results CTCs were detected in 25 of 40 patients (63%). Patients with detectable PD‐L1+ CTCs (14/25, 64%) had significantly longer progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with patients with PD‐L1− CTCs (26.6 months vs. 5.5 months; p = .018). The 12‐month PFS rates were 76% versus 22% in the PD‐L1+ versus PD‐L1− CTCs groups (p = .012), respectively. A multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed that PD‐L1+ CTC is an independent predictive biomarker of PFS (hazard ratio, 0.229; 95% confidence interval, 0.052–1.012; p = .026). Conclusion Our results reveal the potential of CTCs as a noninvasive real‐time biopsy to evaluate PD‐L1 expression in patients with melanoma. PD‐L1 expression on CTCs may be predictive of response to pembrolizumab and longer PFS. Implications for Practice The present data suggest that PD‐L1 expression on circulating tumor cells may predict response to pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. This needs further validation in a larger trial and, if proven, might be a useful liquid biopsy tool that could be used to stratify patients into groups more likely to respond to immunotherapy, hence leading to health cost savings.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a surrogate to tissue biopsy for noninvasive identification of mutations across multiple genetic loci and for disease monitoring in melanoma. In this study, we compared the mutation profiles of tumor biopsies and plasma ctDNA from metastatic melanoma patients using custom sequencing panels targeting 30 melanoma‐associated genes. Somatic mutations were identified in 20 of 24 melanoma biopsies, and 16 of 20 (70%) matched‐patient plasmas had detectable ctDNA. In a subgroup of seven patients for whom matching tumor tissue and plasma were sequenced, 80% of the mutations found in tumor tissue were also detected in ctDNA. However, TERT promoter mutations were only detected by ddPCR, and promoter mutations were consistently found at lower concentrations than other driver mutations in longitudinal samples. In vitro experiments revealed that mutations in promoter regions of TERT and DPH3 are underrepresented in ctDNA. While the results underscore the utility of using ctDNA as an alternative to tissue biopsy for genetic profiling and surveillance of the disease, our study highlights the underrepresentation of promoter mutations in ctDNA and its potential impact on quantitative liquid biopsy applications.

BackgroundCurrently mainly BRAF mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is utilized to monitor patients with melanoma. TERT promoter mutations are common in various cancers and found in up to 70% of melanomas, including half of BRAF wild-type cases. Therefore, a sensitive method for detection of TERT promoter mutations would increase the number of patients that could be monitored through ctDNA analysis.MethodsA droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay was designed for the concurrent detection of chr5:1,295,228 C>T and chr5:1,295,250 C>T TERT promoter mutations. The assay was validated using 39 melanoma cell lines and 22 matched plasma and tumor samples. In addition, plasma samples from 56 metastatic melanoma patients and 56 healthy controls were tested for TERT promoter mutations.ResultsThe established ddPCR assay detected TERT promoter mutations with a lower limit of detection (LOD) of 0.17%. Total concordance was demonstrated between ddPCR and Sanger sequencing in all cell lines except one, which carried a second mutation within the probe binding-site. Concordance between matched plasma and tumor tissue was 68% (15/22), with a sensitivity of 53% (95% CI, 27%-79%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 59%-100%). A significantly longer PFS (p=0.028) was evident in ctDNA negative patients. Importantly, our TERT promoter mutations ddPCR assay allowed detection of ctDNA in 11 BRAF wild-type cases.ConclusionsThe TERT promoter mutation ddPCR assay offers a sensitive test for molecular analysis of melanoma tumors and ctDNA, with the potential to be applied to other cancers.

The identification of somatic mutations is crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions about personalized melanoma treatment. However, genetic analysis of tumors is usually performed on limited and often low-quality DNA from tumors with low tumor cellularity and high tumor heterogeneity. Different mutation-detection platforms exist, with varying analytical sensitivities. Here we evaluated the detection of common mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and TERT promoter in 40 melanoma FFPE tissues using Droplet Digital (dd)PCR, and compared the results to the detection rates obtained by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing. The cellularity of tumors analyzed ranged from 5% to 50% (n = 28) and 50% to 90% (n = 12). Overall, droplet digital (dd)PCR was more sensitive, detecting mutations in 12.5% and 23% of tumors deemed as wild-type by pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing, respectively. The increased sensitivity of ddPCR was more apparent among tumors with <50% tumor cellularity. Implementation of ddPCR-based assays may facilitate analysis of early-stage tumors and support research into improving outcomes in melanoma patients.

Purpose: We evaluated the predictive value of pretreatment ctDNA to inform therapeutic outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma relative to type and line of treatment. Experimental Design: Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was quantified in 125 samples collected from 110 patients prior to commencing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as first-(n ¼ 32) or second-line (n ¼ 27) regimens, or prior to commencing first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy (n ¼ 66). An external validation cohort included 128 patients commencing ICI therapies in the first-(N ¼ 77) or second-line (N ¼ 51) settings. Results: In the discovery cohort, low ctDNA (≤20 copies/mL) prior to commencing therapy predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with first-line ICIs [HR, 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.53; P < 0.0001], but not in the second-line setting. An independent cohort validated that ctDNA is predictive of PFS in the first-line setting (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.83; P ¼ 0.006), but not in the second-line ICI setting. Moreover, ctDNA prior to commencing ICI treatment was not predictive of PFS for patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in either the discovery or validation cohorts. Reduced PFS and overall survival were observed in patients with high ctDNA receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy, relative to those treated with combination anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusions: Pretreatment ctDNA is a reliable indicator of patient outcome in the first-line ICI treatment setting, but not in the second-line ICI setting, especially in patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Preliminary evidence indicated that treatment-na€ ve patients with high ctDNA may preferentially benefit from combined ICIs.