The physiological role of LepA, a paralog of EF-G found in all bacteria, has been a mystery for decades. Here, we show that LepA functions in ribosome biogenesis. In cells lacking LepA, immature 30S particles accumulate. Four proteins are specifically underrepresented in these particles—S3, S10, S14, and S21—all of which bind late in the assembly process and contribute to the folding of the 3′ domain of 16S rRNA. Processing of 16S rRNA is also delayed in the mutant strain, as indicated by increased levels of precursor 17S rRNA in assembly intermediates. MutationΔlepAconfers a synthetic growth phenotype in absence of RsgA, another GTPase, well known to act in 30S subunit assembly. Analysis of theΔrsgAstrain reveals accumulation of intermediates that resemble those seen in the absence of LepA. These data suggest that RsgA and LepA play partially redundant roles to ensure efficient 30S assembly.

Summary Protein synthesis relies on several translational GTPases (trGTPases), related proteins that couple the hydrolysis of GTP to specific molecular events on the ribosome. Most bacterial trGTPases, including IF2, EF‐Tu, EF‐G and RF3, play well‐known roles in translation. The cellular functions of LepA (also termed EF4) and BipA (also termed TypA), conversely, have remained enigmatic. Recent studies provide compelling in vivo evidence that LepA and BipA function in biogenesis of the 30S and 50S subunit respectively. These findings have important implications for ribosome biogenesis in bacteria. Because the GTPase activity of each of these proteins depends on interactions with both ribosomal subunits, some portion of 30S and 50S assembly must occur in the context of the 70S ribosome. In this review, we introduce the trGTPases of bacteria, describe the new functional data on LepA and BipA, and discuss the how these findings shape our current view of ribosome biogenesis in bacteria.

No abstract

Many small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNA)s are processed from introns of host genes, but the importance of splicing for proper biogenesis and the fate of the snoRNAs is not well understood. Here, we show that inactivation of splicing factors or mutation of splicing signals leads to the accumulation of partially processed hybrid messenger RNA–snoRNA (hmsnoRNA) transcripts. hmsnoRNAs are processed to the mature 3′ ends of the snoRNAs by the nuclear exosome and bound by small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins. hmsnoRNAs are unaffected by translation-coupled RNA quality-control pathways, but they are degraded by the major cytoplasmic exonuclease Xrn1p, due to their messenger RNA (mRNA)-like 5′ extensions. These results show that completion of splicing is required to promote complete and accurate processing of intron-encoded snoRNAs and that splicing defects lead to degradation of hybrid mRNA-snoRNA species by cytoplasmic decay, underscoring the importance of splicing for the biogenesis of intron-encoded snoRNAs.

No abstract