Research in the area of motivation in autistic and other children suggests that autistic children may be capable of performing at a higher level than they typically function. This article describes research in the area of 'learned helplessness' which suggests that autistic children's handicaps may expose them to frequent failure and to an unusual level of non-contingent reinforcement which may produce a 'learned helplessness' state of extremely low motivation, with a consequent abnormally low overall functioning level. The present article also discusses research on strategies which might be employed to improve autistic children's exposure to favourable response-reinforcer contingencies. This would be expected to improve the general level of motivation in such children, with related gains in the acquisition, generalization maintenance of a broad array of target behaviours.

Cohesion strategies used by 3 normal and 3 head-injured adults were examined in both conversational and narrative conditions. Two major findings emerged. First, the head-injured subjects used different cohesion patterns from the normal adults in both conditions. Second, both groups used different cohesion patterns in the conversational and narrative conditions. The study highlights the importance of viewing the language of head-injured adults within the context of discourse. Testing the language system through narrative as well as conversational discourse is important since both conditions are characterized by their own distinctive internal structure and organization.

The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable multidimensional topic analysis that would be sensitive to patterns and problems in topic management. Six conversation and four monologue language samples of a closed-head-injured adult and a matched normal adult were compared. High interjudge reliability was found for all frequently occurring parameters of the analysis. Differences between the two subjects were obtained on a number of the topic introduction and maintenance parameters. The results illustrate the potential of the analysis to reliably identify, quantify, and describe differences between subjects in discourse topic management. The potential of the analysis to provide detailed profiles of topic management and describe the influence of such variables as genre and topic complexity on discourse topic was demonstrated.

The purpose of the study was to provide a detailed evaluation of the topic management abilities of a group of subjects with senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (SDAT) and to compare their patterns of topic management to that of a normal elderly (NE) subject group. Twenty-four subjects participated in the study: 12 SDAT subjects and 12 NE subjects matched along the variables of age, sex, and education. The evaluation of topic management was based on a 20-minute casual conversational interaction between the subject and a speech-language pathologist that was videotaped and later transcribed orthographically. Topic management was analyzed in terms of a modified version of the multidimensional topic coherence analysis developed by Mentis and Prutting (1991). The results indicated significant differences between the SDAT and NE subjects along a number of parameters of topic introduction and maintenance. The topic management profiles of the SDAT subjects were characterized by a reduced ability to change topics while preserving the discourse flow, difficulty in actively contributing to the propositional development of the topic, and a failure to consistently maintain topic in a clear and coherent manner. These problems appeared to be related to underlying problems across the discourse-pragmatic, linguistic, and cognitive domains; they highlight the need to more fully explore the interactions among deficits in SDAT and their effects on conversational discourse.

Mentis , M., & Lundgren, K. (1995). Effects of prenatal exposure to cocaine and associated risk factors on language development. Abstract:During the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the number of children born with prenatal exposure to cocaine. However, there is very little hard data concerning the later development of these children. The purpose of this preliminary study was to compare the language development profiles of 5 children prenatally exposed to cocaine and associated risk factors to the language development profiles of a matched non-exposed control group in terms of analyses of the discourse-pragmatic, semantic, and form components of language. The language evaluation was based on the analysis of a 30-minute language sample. The results suggested differences between the two groups as well as differences within the cocaine-exposed group. The major differences between the two groups were in discourse-pragmatics although less marked differences in syntactic development were also found. The results are discussed in relation to the potential contribution of pertinent medical and environmental risk factors. The study suggests that for children with prenatal exposure to cocaine in combination with multiple associated risk factors, language development may be compromised. Keywords: prenatal cocaine exposure | language development | risk factorsArticle: