The 19q13 amplicon in pancreatic cancer cells contains a novel pancreatic differentiation 2 (PD2) gene (accession number AJ401156), which was identified by differential screening analysis. PD2 is the human homologue of the RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 (hPaf1). In yeast, Paf1 is part of the transcription machinery, acting as a docking protein in between the complexes Rad6-Bre1, COMPASS-Dot1p, and the phosphorylated carboxyl terminal domain of the RNA polymerase II. As such, Paf1 is directly involved in transcription elongation via histone H2B ubiquitination and histone H3 methylation. The PD2 sequence is highly conserved from Drosophila to humans with up to 98% identity between rodent and human, suggesting the functional importance of PD2/ hPaf1 to maintain cellular homeostasis. PD2 is a modular protein composed of RNA recognition motif, DEADboxes, an aspartic/serine (DS)-domain, a regulator of the chromosome condensation domain and myc-type helixloop-helix domains. Our results further showed that PD2 is a nuclear 80 kDa protein, which interacts with RNA polymerase II. In addition, we have demonstrated that the overexpression of PD2 in the NIH 3T3 cells result in enhanced growth rates in vitro and tumor formation in vivo. Altogether, this paper presents strong evidence that the overexpression of PD2/hPaf1 is involved in cancer development.

These studies demonstrated that MUC1 peptides may be utilized as an effective anticancer immunotherapeutic, and confirmed the importance of immunogenic epitopes outside of the TR.

MUC1 was first defined as a tumor antigen in the late 1980s, yet little is known about the types of immune responses that mediate rejection of MUC1(+) tumors in vivo. MUC1-specific antibodies, T(h) cells and cytotoxic T cells can be detected in patients with different adenocarcinomas, yet these tumors usually progress. Thus, there is a need to better understand the in vivo mechanisms of antigen-specific tumor rejection. To characterize the nature of MUC1-specific immune responses in vivo, rejection of a MUC1-expressing melanoma tumor line (B16.MUC1) was evaluated in mice lacking specific T cell subsets, cytokines, co-stimulatory molecules or molecular effectors of cytolytic pathways. Results demonstrated that rejection of the B16.MUC1 tumor cell line was primarily mediated by CD4(+) T cells, and required Fas ligand, lymphotoxin-alpha, CD40, CD40 ligand and CD28, but not perforin, gammadelta T cells, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12 or tumor necrosis factor receptor-1. Depletion of NK cells demonstrated that NK cells might also contribute to MUC1 immunity in the B16.MUC1 tumor model. These results demonstrated that the immune response generated against MUC1 does not fit the type 1 or 2 model described for many immune responses. Additionally, multiple cytolytic mechanisms are required for B16.MUC1 rejection.

Previous studies have indicated that different effector cells are required to eliminate MUC1-expressing tumors derived from different organ sites and that different vaccine strategies may be necessary to generate these two different MUC1-specific immune responses. In this study, we characterized molecular components that are required to produce immune responses that eliminate Panc02.MUC1 tumors in vivo by utilizing mice genetically deficient in molecules related to immunity. A parallel study has been reported for a B16.MUC1 tumor model. We confirmed that a CD8(+) effector cell was required to eliminate MUC1-expressing Panc02 tumors, and demonstrated that T cells expressing TCR-alpha/beta and co-stimulation through CD28 and CD40:CD40L interactions played critical roles during the initiation of the anti-Panc02.MUC1 immune response. TCR-alpha/beta(+) cells were required to eliminate Panc02.MUC1 tumors, while TCR-gamma/delta(+) cells played a suppressive non-MUC1-specific role in anti-Panc02 tumor immunity. Type 1 cytokine interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), but not interleukin-12 (IL-12), was essential for eliminating MUC1-expressing tumors, while neither IL-4 nor IL-10 (type 2 cytokines) were required for tumor rejection. In vitro studies demonstrated that IFN-gamma upregulated MHC class I, but not MHC class II, on Panc02.MUC1 tumor cells. Surprisingly, both perforin and FasL played unique roles during the effector phase of immunity to Panc02.MUC1, while lymphotoxin-alpha, but not TNFR-1, was required for immunity against Panc02.MUC1 tumors. The findings presented here and in parallel studies of B16.MUC1 immunity clearly demonstrate that different effector cells and cytolytic mechanisms are required to eliminate MUC1-expressing tumors derived from different organ sites, and provide insight into the immune components required to eliminate tumors expressing the same antigen but derived from different tissues.

A C57BL/6 mouse transgenic for human MUC1 (MUC1.Tg) was developed to evaluate MUC1-specific tumor immunity in an animal that expresses MUC1 as a normal self protein. Previous studies showed that MUC1.Tg mice, challenged with syngeneic tumors expressing MUC1 (B16.MUC1), developed progressively growing MUC1-positive tumors, whereas wild-type C57BL/6 (wt) mice developed MUC1-negative tumors at a significantly slower rate. The results of a limiting dilution CTL frequency assay were not informative, in that similar numbers of MUC1-specific CTL precursors (CTL) were detected in MUC1.Tg and wt mice. Tumor immunity in vivo was characterized by an adoptive transfer method to evaluate the degree of MUC1 or non-MUC1 tumor immunity in wt or MUC1.Tg mice. The results revealed that wt mice developed protective tumor immunity mediated by MUC1-specific CD4+ lymphocytes, while MUC1.Tg mice were functionally tolerant to MUC1 in vivo. The potential of adoptive immunotherapy to provide immunity to tumors expressing MUC1 and to produce undesirable autoimmunity in recipient MUC1.Tg mice expressing MUC1 as a self Ag was evaluated. Adoptive transfer of immune cells from wt mice primed in vivo with B16.MUC1 tumor cells into MUC1.Tg recipients resulted in significant increases in the survival of MUC1.Tg recipients compared with unmanipulated control MUC1.Tg mice challenged with B16.MUC1 tumor cells. This response was specific for MUC1 since control tumors developed at equivalent rates in recipient or control MUC1.Tg mice. No gross or histologic evidence of autoimmunity was observed in recipient MUC1.Tg mice, indicating that tumor immune responses mediated by MUC1-specific CD4+ lymphocytes spare nontransformed epithelia-expressing MUC1.