This study was conducted to assess the utility of the T2Candida panel across an academic health center and identify potential areas for diagnostic optimization. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a T2Candida panel and mycolytic/fungal (myco/f lytic) blood culture collected simultaneously during hospitalizations from February 2017 to March 2018. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the panel compared to myco/f lytic blood culture. Secondary outcomes included Candida species isolated from culture or detected on the panel, source of infection, days of therapy (DOT) of antifungals in patients with discordant results, and overall antifungal DOT/1,000 patient days. A total of 433 paired T2Candida panel and myco/f lytic blood cultures were identified. The pretest likelihood of candidemia was 4.4%. The sensitivity and specificity were 64.7% and 95.6%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 40.7% and 98.5%, respectively. There were 16 patients with T2Candida panel positive and myco/f lytic blood culture negative results, while 6 patients had T2Candida panel negative and myco/f blood culture positive results. The overall antifungal DOT/1,000 patient days was improved after implementation of the T2Candida panel; however, the use of micafungin continued to decline after the panel was removed. We found that the T2Candida panel is a highly specific diagnostic tool; however, the sensitivity and positive predictive value may be lower than previously reported when employed in clinical practice. Clinicians should use this panel as an adjunct to blood cultures when making a definitive diagnosis of candidemia.

Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused over 400,000 deaths worldwide thus far, and poses therapeutic challenges for millions of patients. There is currently no treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Multiple agents have been used off-label to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection based on small observational cohorts and in vitro data. Here we present the experience of a large academic medical center in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted for greater than 24 hours with a nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and/or bronchoalveolar lavage sample positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Demographic data, comorbidities, clinical data, and treatment data were collected from the electronic medical record. Off-label therapies were used at the discretion of the treating providers guided by regularly updated treatment guidelines assembled by infectious diseases physicians and antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), endotracheal intubation, initiation of vasopressors, and drug-related adverse events. Results Data collection was completed for 448 patients admitted between March 18, 2020 and May 8, 2020. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 13.4% (60/448) during this time. Mortality rates increased with age, up to 45% for patients over 80 years old. Male sex, hypertension, chronic pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, chronic liver disease were also risk factors for increased mortality. QTc interval prolongation occurred significantly more frequently in patients who received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with or without azithromycin(AZM) than those who did not (HCQ 6%, HCQ+AZM 7.8% vs all other patients, 0%, p< .0001). Review of treatment trends showed close adherence to the treatment recommendations at that time (Figure 1). Patient Characteristics Admission Laboratory Data by Disease Severity QTc Prolongation Conclusion SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with significant inpatient mortality, and use of off-label treatments was associated with significant drug-related adverse events. Treatment regimens changed rapidly, and providers adhered closely to institutional guidelines as they evolved. Treatment Trends by Week QTC pre/post Treatment by Hydroxychloroquine Use vs. No Hydroxychloroquine Use Disclosures Samir Gupta, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)

Objective: To describe the use of cidofovir (CDV) for viral infections in immunocompromised children (IC) and provide guidance on dosing and supportive care. Data Sources: A PubMed search was conducted for literature published between 1997 and January 2022 using the following terms: cidofovir, plus children or pediatrics. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Limits were set to include human subjects less than 24 years of age receiving intravenous (IV) or intrabladder CDV for treatment of infections due to adenovirus, polyomavirus-BK (BKV), herpesviruses, or cytomegalovirus. Data Synthesis: Data were heterogeneous, with largely uncontrolled studies. Conventional dosing (CDV 5 mg/kg/dose weekly) was commonly used in 60% (31/52) of studies and modified dosing (CDV 1 mg/kg/dose 3 times/week) was used in 17% (9/52) of studies, despite being off-label. Nephrotoxicity reported across studies totaled 16% (65/403 patients), which was higher for conventional dosing 29 of 196 patients (15%) than modified dosing 1 of 27 patients (4%). Saline hyperhydration and concomitant probenecid remain the cornerstones of supportive care, while some regimens omitting probenecid are emerging to target BKV. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of CDV use (indications, dosing, supportive care, response, and nephrotoxicity) in pediatric IC. Conclusions: Effective utilization of CDV in IC remains challenging. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal CDV dosing; however, less aggressive dosing regimens such as modified thrice weekly dosing or low dosing once weekly omitting probenecid to enhance urinary penetration may be reasonable alternatives to conventional dosing in some IC.

Limited data on optimal posaconazole dosing strategies for pediatric patients exist. In this study, we found that the median initial dose in patients who achieved a posaconazole plasma concentration of 0.7 μg/mL was 22.8 mg/kg per day whereas the median initial dose in those who did not reach the target concentration was 15.8 mg/kg per day; this result suggests that higher initial doses might be warranted.