BackgroundHost selection is an important determinant of vectorial capacity because malaria transmission increases when mosquitoes feed more on humans than non-humans. Host selection also affects the outcome of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN). Despite the recent nationwide implementation of LLIN-based malaria control program in Papua New Guinea (PNG), little is known about the host selection of the local Anopheles vectors. This study investigated the host selection of Anopheles vectors in PNG.MethodsBlood-engorged mosquitoes were sampled using the barrier screen method and blood meals analyzed for vertebrate host source with PCR-amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Abundance of common hosts was estimated in surveys. The test of homogeneity of proportions and the Manly resource selection ratio were used to determine if hosts were selected in proportion to their abundance.ResultsTwo thousand four hundred and forty blood fed Anopheles females of seven species were sampled from five villages in Madang, PNG. Of 2,142 samples tested, 2,061 (96.2%) yielded a definitive host source; all were human, pig, or dog. Hosts were not selected in proportion to their abundance, but rather were under-selected or over-selected by the mosquitoes. Four species, Anopheles farauti (sensu stricto) (s.s.), Anopheles punctulatus (s.s.), Anopheles farauti no. 4 and Anopheles longirostris, over-selected humans in villages with low LLIN usage, but over-selected pigs in villages with high LLIN usage. Anopheles koliensis consistently over-selected humans despite high LLIN usage, and Anopheles bancroftii over-selected pigs.ConclusionsThe plasticity of host selection of an Anopheles species depends on its opportunistic, anthropophilic or zoophilic behavior, and on the extent of host availability and LLIN usage where the mosquitoes forage for hosts. The high anthropophily of An. koliensis increases the likelihood of contacting the LLIN inside houses. This allows its population size to be reduced to levels insufficient to support transmission. In contrast, by feeding on alternative hosts the likelihood of the opportunistic species to contact LLIN is lower, making them difficult to control. By maintaining high population size, the proportion that feed on humans outdoors can sustain residual transmission despite high LLIN usage in the village.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2038-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Papua New Guinea (PNG) has the highest malaria transmission outside of Africa. Longlasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are believed to have helped to reduce average malaria prevalence in PNG from 16% in 2008 to 1% in 2014. Since 2015 malaria in PNG has resurged significantly. Here, we present observations documenting decreased bioefficacy of unused LLINs with manufacturing dates between 2013 and 2019 collected from villages and LLIN distributors in PNG. Specifically, we show that of n = 167 tested LLINs manufactured after 2013, only 17% are fulfilling the required World Health Organisation bioefficacy standards of ≥ 80% 24 h mortality or ≥ 95% 60 min knockdown in bioassays with pyrethroid susceptible Anopheles farauti mosquitoes. In contrast, all (100%, n = 25) LLINs with manufacturing dates prior to 2013 are meeting these bioefficacy standards. These results suggest that decreased bioefficacy of LLINs is contributing to the malaria resurgence in PNG and increased scrutiny of LLIN quality is warranted.
In June 2012, health authorities in Papua New Guinea detected an increase in febrile illnesses in Vanimo. Chikungunya virus of the Eastern/Central/Southern African genotype harboring the E1:A226V mutation was identified. This ongoing outbreak has spread to ≥8 other provinces and has had a harmful effect on public health.
Background: Papua New Guinea (PNG) has the highest malaria transmission outside of Africa and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) are the only vector-control tool distributed country-wide. LLIN were introduced into PNG in about 2005 and have been attributed to have had a huge impact on malaria transmission, with reductions in malaria prevalence observed from 15.7% (2008) to 1% (2014). Since 2015, malaria indicators in PNG have risen significantly. Similar trends have been observed in several African nations. In the present study, we observed a drastic reduction in bioefficacy of LLIN collected both from communities (used nets) and prior to use (new nets). We hypothesise that decreased bioefficacy of LLINs is a major contributor to the observed malaria resurgence in PNG and possibly in other parts of the world. Methods: New LLIN in original and unopened packaging (n=192) with a range of manufacturing dates from 2007-2019 were collected either directly from consignments or from households in 15 PNG provinces. Used LLIN (n=40) were collected in 2 provinces, with manufacturing dates ranging from 2008-2017. LLIN were subjected to standard WHO cone bioassays using fully susceptible An. farauti mosquitoes. A subset of LLIN was re-tested using fully susceptible An. gambiae mosquitoes in order to ensure reproducibility of results. Results: Only 7% (95% CI 4-12%) of new LLIN manufactured between 2013-2019 exhibited 100% mortality. However, 84% (95%CI: 65-84%) new nets manufactured in 2012 or before exhibited 100% mortality. Only 29 % of used LLIN less than 3 years old exhibited > 80% 24h-mortality. Results obtained in tests using An. farauti corresponded well with confirmatory tests conducted using An. gambiae. Discussion: Bioefficacy of LLIN in PNG appears to have been highly variable since 2013, with few nets manufactured since 2013 meeting WHO standards. This time-frame coincides with malaria resurgence in the country. These results may have ramifications for LLIN-based malaria control that go beyond the local PNG scenario.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.