The epigenetic sensor BRD4 (bromodomain protein 4) is a potent target for anti-cancer therapies. To study the transcriptional impact of BRD4 in cancer, we generated an expression signature of BRD4 knockdown cells and found oxidative stress response genes significantly enriched. We integrated the RNA-Seq results with DNA-binding sites of BRD4 generated by chromatin immunoprecipitations, correlated these with gene expressions from human prostate cancers and identified 21 top BRD4 candidate genes among which the oxidative stress pathway genes KEAP1, SESN3 and HDAC6 are represented. Knock down of BRD4 or treatment with the BRD4 inhibitor JQ1 resulted in decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and increased cell viability under H2O2 exposure. Consistently, a deregulation of BRD4 diminished the KEAP1/NRF2 axis and led to a disturbed regulation of the inducible heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1). Without exogenous stress induction, we also found BRD4 directly targeting the HMOX1 promoter over the SP1-binding sites. Our findings provide insight into the transcriptional regulatory network of BRD4 and highlight BRD4 as signal transducer of the cellular response to oxidative stress.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) arising in Lynch syndrome (LS) comprises tumours with constitutional mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. There is still a lack of whole-genome and transcriptome studies of LS-CRC to address questions about similarities and differences in mutation and gene expression characteristics between LS-CRC and sporadic CRC, about the molecular heterogeneity of LS-CRC, and about specific mechanisms of LS-CRC genesis linked to dysfunctional mismatch repair in LS colonic mucosa and the possible role of immune editing. Here, we provide a first molecular characterization of LS tumours and of matched tumour-distant reference colonic mucosa based on whole-genome DNA-sequencing and RNA-sequencing analyses. Our data support two subgroups of LS-CRCs, G1 and G2, whereby G1 tumours show a higher number of somatic mutations, a higher amount of microsatellite slippage, and a different mutation spectrum. The gene expression phenotypes support this difference. Reference mucosa of G1 shows a strong immune response associated with the expression of HLA and immune checkpoint genes and the invasion of CD4+ T cells. Such an immune response is not observed in LS tumours, G2 reference and normal (non-Lynch) mucosa, and sporadic CRC. We hypothesize that G1 tumours are edited for escape from a highly immunogenic microenvironment via loss of HLA presentation and T-cell exhaustion. In contrast, G2 tumours seem to develop in a less immunogenic microenvironment where tumour-promoting inflammation parallels tumourigenesis. Larger studies on non-neoplastic mucosa tissue of mutation carriers are required to better understand the early phases of emerging tumours.