Objective We evaluated the potential of methylphenidate to improve antidepressant response to citalopram in elderly depressed patients with respect to clinical and cognitive outcomes. Methods We conducted a 16-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial for geriatric depression in 143 older outpatients diagnosed with major depression comparing treatment response in three groups: 1) methylphenidate and placebo (N=48); 2) citalopram and placebo (N=48); 3) methylphenidate and citalopram (N=47). Primary outcome was defined as the change in depression severity. Remission was defined as Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24) score of 6 or below. Secondary outcomes included measures of anxiety, apathy, quality of life, and cognition. Results Citalopram daily doses ranged between 20–60 mg (mean 32 mg); methylphenidate daily doses ranged between 5–40 mg (mean 16 mg). All groups showed significant improvement in the severity of depression. However, the improvement in depression severity and the clinical global impression was more prominent in the methylphenidate and citalopram group compared to methylphenidate and placebo and citalopram and placebo (P<0.05). Additionally, the rate of improvement in the methylphenidate and citalopram group was significantly faster than that in the citalopram and placebo in the first 4 weeks of the trial. The groups did not differ on cognitive improvement or the number of side-effects. Conclusions Combined treatment with citalopram and methylphenidate demonstrated an enhanced clinical response profile in the mood and wellbeing, and the rate of response compared to either drug. All treatments led to an improvement in cognitive functioning, without additional benefit from the use of methylphenidate.

Patients with VD have a distinct clinical and neuropsychological profile that is mostly consistent across different methods for identifying the illness. These findings support the notion that MRI-defined VD represents a unique and valid subtype of late-life depression.

This is the first study to document high rates of vascular depression in a clinical sample of African Americans and Caucasians. Our findings suggest that vascular depression may be overrepresented among African Americans, which is consistent with the high rates of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and stroke in this population.

Objectives Depressed older adults are at risk for the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but few studies have characterized MCI subtypes in geriatric depression. The objective of this study was to identify the clinical patterns of MCI in late-life depression. Design Baseline demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological test data collected as part of a randomized antidepressant trial for geriatric depression. Setting UCLA-based outpatient clinic. Participants One hundred thirty-eight older adults with major depression. Measurements A neuropsychological test battery and comprehensive evaluations of depression, apathy, quality of life, medical burden, and vascular risk factors. Results Seventy-one participants (51%) had MCI and 67 (49%) were cognitively normal. Of subjects with MCI, 14 (20%) had amnestic MCI and 57 (80%) had non-amnestic MCI. Overall, patients with MCI had greater depression severity, poorer quality of life, and worse performance on the Mini-Mental State Exam than patients without MCI. Patients with non-amnestic MCI had significantly greater depression severity than patients without MCI. Across all subjects, depression severity correlated with impaired performance in language and visuospatial functioning. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MCI is associated with greater severity of depression, poorer quality of life, and worse global cognitive function. Overall, subtypes of MCI in geriatric depression differ in the patterns of functional impairment, which may require different therapeutic approaches.