There is no uniformly applied grading system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DA). The scheme advocated by the WHO is essentially that of Kloppel et al, and is based on the "highest grade" focus. Although it is precise with good prognostic value, it is unfortunately not widely applied, largely because of the lack of recognition and partly because of its complex nature (interpretation of multiple parameters). Furthermore, it is fundamentally different from the one used in Japan, which evaluates the overall pattern. To establish a more widely applicable, practical, and clinically relevant grading system, a scheme similar to Gleason's scoring system was developed and tested on 112 cases of resected pancreatic DA and was compared with the WHO system. In the grading system devised, patterns (P) of infiltration were classified as follows: P1, well-defined glands with easily discernible contours; P2, fused or poorly formed glands with ill-defined contours; P3, nonglandular patterns. A score was then obtained by the summation of the predominant and the secondary patterns. Scores < or =3 (at least some well-formed glands and no nonglandular pattern) was graded as G1, 4 as G2, and > or =5 (at least some nonglandular patterns and no well-formed glandular pattern) as G3. Seventy-three percent of the cases displayed mixed patterns, with disparate patterns (P1 with P3) in 13%, confirming the high degree of heterogeneity of DA. There was a significant correlation between grade and survival, better than the correlation between survival and either the major or minor patterns evaluated separately. The median survival for G1, G2, and G3 were 22, 14, and 8 months; 1-year survival 68%, 44%, and 33%; 2-year was 67%, 11%, and 0%; and 3-year was 23%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.0019). In a multivariate analysis, correlating survival with grade, tumor size, and lymph node status, the grade was the strongest independent predictor of survival. Odds ratio of dying of disease were 3.56 (P < 0.0001) in G3 versus G1, 1.79 (P = 0.058) in G2 versus G1, and 1.98 (P = 0.03) in G3 versus G2. Compared with this, the same odds ratio were 1.17 (P = 0.01) in tumors >2 cm versus < or =2 cm and 1.78 (P = 0.01) in cases with positive versus negative lymph nodes. The WHO grading scheme was not found to have as good a correlation with survival in this study, with WHO grade 2 showing a better survival than 1. The reproducibility of both the proposed grading system and that of WHO were found to be moderately good (with kappa values of 0.43 and 0.44, respectively), when 32 slides of DA were graded by four independent observers. The grading scheme for pancreatobiliary adenocarcinoma proposed here is highly applicable because it is practical and readily adoptable. It reflects biologic characteristics of ductal carcinoma (prominent tubule formation and tumor heterogeneity). Most importantly, it is clinically relevant with good prognostic value. Lastly, it is also applicable for use in research, by utilizing "patterns," even in small specimens like microa...

We identified 120 multiple myeloma (MM) cases with satisfactory cytogenetic evaluation and abnormal karyotypes. Hyperdiploid karyotype was found in 77 cases (64%), hypodiploid in 30 cases (25%), and the remaining 13 cases (11%) had a pseudodiploid karyotype. The most common numerical abnormalities were gains of chromosomes 15, 9, 3 followed by chromosomes 19, 11, 7, 21, and 5. Whole chromosome losses were also frequent involving primarily chromosomes X/Y, 8, 13, 14, and 22. Most cases showed also structural rearrangements leading to del(1p), dup(1q), del(5q), del(6q), del(8p), del(9p), del(13q), and del(17p). Chromosome 13/13q deletion was found in 52% of cases; complete loss of 13 was observed in 73% of cases, whereas 27% had interstitial deletions. In addition, 13/13q deletions occurred in 75% of nonhyperdiploid myeloma but only 39% of the hyperdiploid had 13/13q deletions. Translocations affecting 14q32/IGH region was seen 40 cases; t(11;14)(q13;q32) in 17 cases, t(14;16)(q32;q23) and t(8;14)(q24;q32) in three cases each, and t(6;14)(p21;q32) and t(1;14)(q21;q32) in two cases each. The remaining 14q32 translocations had various t(V;14) partners or of an undetermined origin. Remarkably, the 14q32/IGH translocations were less frequent in the hyperdiploid karyotypes than the nonhyperdiploid karyotypes (17 vs. 63%). Fourteen cases showed break at 8q24/CMYC site; seven of those had Burkitt's-type translocations. Our results revealed that conventional cytogenetics remains an important tool in elucidating the complex and divers genetic anomalies of MM. Cytogenetics identifies two distinct groups of MM, hyperdiploid and nonhyperdiploid, and establishes the presence of prognostic chromosomal markers such as 13/13q, 17p, 8q24, and 16q aberrations. Am. J. Hematol. 82:1080Hematol. 82: -1087Hematol. 82: , 2007

Stereotactic or ultrasound-guided needle core breast biopsies (NCBB) are now routinely performed to assess suspicious microcalcifications or non-palpable masses detected by screening mammography. This approach has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in establishing the diagnosis of fibrocystic lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and invasive carcinoma (1). As more NCBB are being performed, pathologists are encountering lesions with features of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). There are two issues that impact the clinical evaluation of patients with atypical lesions in NCBB samples. First, malignant lesions are known to frequently coexist with ADH/ALH, either within the same segment of breast tissue or in different quadrants (the latter as a manifestation of so-called field effect alteration). Because of partial/limited sampling, it is thus theoretically possible that at least some patients with atypia on NCBB may harbor occult DCIS. This problem is highlighted by the consideration that histologic distinction between ADH and DCIS is partially quantitative in nature (2, 3). Second, microfocal lesions may be missed during the process of trimming the block (so-called sectioning artifact). This problem is exacerbated if cores are fragmented or associated with crushing,

Background: Stereotactic incisional core breast biopsy (SCBB) is a highly specific technique for diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in patients with suspicious mammographic microcalcifications. However, its sensitivity for excluding the presence of coexisting occult invasive disease in this setting is not fully established. Design: We correlated SCBB findings to subsequent lumpectomy/mastectomy (lx/mx) results in 122 cases of DCIS. In 29 of these cases, the SCBB showed microscopic invasion (n ‫؍‬ 15) or foci that were suspicious for invasion (n ‫؍‬ 14).

Indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (T-LPD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a new provisional entity in the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification. The disease has an indolent course and progression to aggressive T-cell lymphoma has rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 37-year-old male with indolent T-LPD of the GI tract who 3 years later developed aggressive T-cell lymphoma and died of progressive disease. An infiltrate of indolent T-LPD in the GI tract and aggressive lymphoma diagnosed from the liver biopsy had similar immunophenotype, but cellular infiltrate in the liver showed more atypia compared with the GI biopsies of indolent T-LPD. Moreover, T-cell gene rearrangement studies showed an identical clonal rearrangement in indolent T-LPD and aggressive lymphoma. Patients with indolent T-LPD of the GI tract need a long-term follow-up, as some of them may develop more aggressive lymphoma.

No abstract

AS per case ranged widely; their diagnostic yield was low; they were highest in urinary bladder specimens, in malignant and particularly neoadjuvant-treated lesions. Although lymph nodes were most heavily sampled, most AS were from masses. Resident dissection did not increase AS and cost of AS was high.

Ibrutinib is approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, its role in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is not clear and is under investigation. We report a case of CLL that developed MM while on therapy with ibrutinib indicating that this drug may not be active against MM.