No abstract

Molecular cloning of cockroach allergens and their expression as recombinant proteins have allowed a better understanding of the mechanisms of cockroach allergic disease. Recombinant cockroach allergens have been used for skin testing or in vitro methods to measure IgE antibody levels in serum. Early studies evaluating selected U.S. patients revealed that a cocktail of four cockroach allergens, Bla g 1, Bla g 2, Bla g 4, and Bla g 5, would identify 95 % of cockroach allergic patients. More recent studies pointed to an important role of sensitization to tropomyosin among certain populations, and suggested that a cocktail of five allergens Bla g 1 and/or Per a 1, Bla g 2, Bla g 4, Bla g 5, and Bla g 7, and/or Per a 7, would be expected to diagnose 50–64 % of cockroach-allergic patients worldwide. Variation in IgE reactivity profiles could be in part due to IgE responses to cross-reactive homologous allergens from different origins. The availability of purified natural or recombinant cockroach allergens provides the capacity to improve diagnosis of cockroach allergy and to develop novel forms of immunotherapy for cockroach-allergic patients.

Background: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) reactivity to individual allergens among cockroach-allergic patients has revealed wide variability. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of recombinant cockroach allergens for skin testing, and to determine sensitization profiles among cockroach-allergic patients living in Brazil. Methods: Fifty-seven cockroach-allergic patients with asthma and/or rhinitis were recruited. Skin testing with recombinant (r) allergens from Periplaneta americana (rPer a 1 and rPer a 7) and Blattella germanica (rBla g 2, rBla g 4 and rBla g 5) were performed at 10 μg/ml and 5 μg/ml (rPer a 1). IgE antibodies to rPer a 7 and rPer a 1 were quantitated by ELISA. Results: Of 57 patients tested, 3 (5.3%), 24 (42.1%), 4 (7%), 3 (5.3%) and 4 (7%) showed positive reactions to rPer a 1, rPer a 7, rBla g 2, rBla g 4 and rBla g 5, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (49.1%) had positive tests to at least one allergen. In keeping with skin test results, 31/57 patients (54.4%) and 5/55 patients (9%) had detectable IgE to rPer a 7 and rPer a 1, respectively. Levels of IgE to rPer a 7 were higher in patients with positive tests to rPer a 7 than those with negative tests (geometric mean 13.2 and 1.8 IU/ml, p < 0.05). There was good concordance of results of skin tests and measurements of serum IgE to rPer a 7. Conclusion: IgE reactivity to rPer a 7 (P. americana tropomyosin) was dominant among patients in Brazil. However, 50% of the patients did not present reactivity to any of the recombinant allergens tested.

Since the area presents good conditions of environmental sanitation, health education programs should be implemented that emphasize hygiene procedures for the hands and for food and water to be consumed by the population.