No abstract

No abstract

This article has analyzed the drug disposal form by the population of Distrito Federal (DF), reflecting about its possible health and environmental risks. For that, an exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted based on interviews with residents of all Territorial Planning Units in DF. Among the 393 interviewees, 73.8% had a stock of medicines at home, 78.9% had already discarded drugs, which were mostly done in the common waste (73,6%). Adequate discharge was strongly associated with greater schooling (p = 0,027), higher economic classification (p = 0,005), male sex (p = 0,006) and with receiving information about the subject (p <0,001). It is noted that the inappropriate disposal of drugs is common. It presents the need to incorporate the theme into specific policies and media.

ABSTRACT:Objective: To describe people with diabetes in Brazil and to compare their sociodemographic characteristics, access and self-reported adherence to diabetes prescribed drugs. Methods: Data analysis from the National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of the Rational Use of Medicines, a household survey, with sampling by clusters, according to sex and age domains and national and macro-regional representativeness. Adults (≥ 20 years old) who reported having diabetes constituted the sample. The weighted frequencies of the variables in the sample were analyzed and the Pearson χ 2 test was applied to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between the strata for the data of access, form of financing and adherence to the drugs, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: We found a higher proportion of women, people over 60 years and economy class C. Most participants reported having two or more comorbidities, in addition to diabetes, and taking five or more drugs. Regarding access, 97.8% say they have access to prescription drugs for diabetes and 70.7% say they get them totally free of charge. There was low adherence to anti-diabetic treatment, with significant macro-regional differences (p = 0,001), and greater vulnerability in the South and Northeast regions. Conclusion: Better access to diabetes medicines in the country has been demonstrated. However, to improve the efficiency of health public spending, it is necessary to achieve higher rates of adherence to treatment.

ResumoObjetivo: apresentar a metodologia e resultados da implantação da vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças e agravos não transmissíveis (DANT) em município de pequeno porte, Anchieta, no estado do Espírito Santo, Brasil, em 2010. Métodos: estudo transversal de base populacional com realização de exames bioquímicos, aferição da pressão arterial, avaliação antropométrica e eletrocardiograma da população-alvo. Resultados: aproximadamente 25,0% dos entrevistados relataram consumo regular de refrigerante, 45,2%, carne com gordura, e 22,5%, abuso de bebida alcoólica; 14,1% referiram ser inativos, 16,2%, fumantes, 52,1% apresentaram excesso de peso auto-referido, e 16,9%, obesidade; sobre fatores de proteção, 5,0% da população referiu consumir frutas e hortaliças conforme recomendado, e 3,6%, atividade física no lazer; a prevalência de uso de cinto de segurança no banco da frente foi de 74,0%, e 83,5% dos motociclistas referiram utilizar capacete; entre os indivíduos que realizaram exames, 49,2% apresentaram hipercolesterolemia, 46,0%, lesão renal, 19,0%, alteração em eletrocardiograma e 5,8%, diabetes. Conclusão: a metodologia utilizada permitiu conhecer a prevalência dos fatores de risco e proteção para DANT em município de pequeno porte; ações de promoção da saúde, vigilância, prevenção e atenção estão sendo elaboradas com base nos resultados encontrados.Palavras-chave: fatores de risco; sistemas de informação; doença crônica; sistema de vigilância de fator de risco comportamental; vigilância epidemiológica; adulto; violência. Abstract Objective: to present the methodology and results of the implementation of surveillance for risk and protective factors for non-communicable diseases (NCD) and injuries in a small

OBJECTIVE To characterize the process of selection of medicines for primary health care in the Brazilian regions.METHODS This article is part of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos – Serviços, 2015 (PNAUM – National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines – Services, 2015), a cross-sectional study that consisted of an information gathering in a sample of cities in the five regions of Brazil. The data used were collected by interviews with those responsible for pharmaceutical services (PS) (n = 506), professionals responsible for the dispensing of medicines (n = 1,139), and physicians (n = 1,558). To evaluate the difference between ratios, we adopted the Chi-square test for complex samples. The differences between the averages were analyzed in generalized linear models with F-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The analyses considered significant had p≤0.05.RESULTS The professionals responsible for pharmaceutical services reported non-existence of a formally constituted Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (PTC) (12.5%). They claimed to have an updated (80.4%) list of Essential Medicines (85.3%) and being active participants of this process (88.2%). However, in the perception of respondents, the list only partially (70.1%) meets the health demands. Of the interviewed professionals responsible for the dispensing of medicines, only 16.6% were pharmacists; even so, 47.8% reported to know the procedures to change the list. From the perspective of most of these professionals (70.9%), the list meets the health demands of the city. Among physicians, only 27.2% reported to know the procedures to change the list, but 76.5% would have some claim to change it. Most of them reported to base their claims in clinical experiences (80.0%). For 13.0% of them, the list meets the health demands.CONCLUSIONS As this is the first national survey of characterization of the process of selection of medicines within primary health care, it brings unpublished data for the assessment of policies related to medicines in Brazil.

The effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy has rendered HIV infection a manageable chronic condition. Currently, the health systems face the challenge of adopting organizational healthcare models capable of ensuring the delivery of comprehensive care. The Chronic Care Model has been reported for its effectiveness, particularly in terms of delivery system design. In this study, the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) questionnaire, a soft technology widely used for other chronic conditions, was employed on a teaching hospital to evaluate healthcare provided to people living with HIV/AIDS. The ACIC technology is a self-explanatory instrument which diagnoses, among the six components of the Chronic Care Model Framework, areas for quality improvements, indicating at the same time, intervention strategies and achievements. These components are healthcare network organization, delivery system design, self-management support, decision support, clinical information systems , and community. From May to October 2014, the tool was applied to the multidisciplinary teamwork at the points of care identified, as well as to the hospital management board. Respondents broadly rated care as basic. A pronounced contrast was observed from evaluation by management board and health professional staff in some components like organization of healthcare and clinical information system. The self-management support and delivery system design were the components best evaluated by the multidisciplinary team. Combined with the array of services offered, the entry points available at the hospital can ensure healthcare comprehensiveness. However, some gaps were detected, precluding the delivery of an effective care. The ACIC was considered an adequate technology to provide knowledge of the gaps, to promote productive discussions and reflections within teams and to indicate actions to achieve improvements on healthcare for people living with HIV/AIDS.

The risk of drug interaction (DI), especially in the hospital setting, increases along with the number of drugs used by the patient. Studies that evaluate drug interactions based on patient prescriptions are therefore useful to know this risk and guide strategies to improve drug use. The present study is aimed to identify studies that evaluated DI in patients of Brazilian hospitals. As of bibliographic search in several databases, we collected articles describing prescribing evaluations which focused on the analysis and identification of drug interactions in Brazilian hospitals. The search was conducted in 2017 and there was no restriction of publication time. Of a total of 273 articles retrieved, 23 were included for analysis. Most was published after 2010, and the predominant design was cross-sectional studies. The Micromedex® database was the most used to categorize the interactions, and midazolam and fentanyl was the most commonly reported potential DI in the studies. The results may guide futures research which should assess the real harm of IMP in patients and, then, promote the rational use of drugs.