Background/Aims: The occurrence and clinical relevance of DNA hypermethylation and global hypomethylation in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are still unknown. We evaluated the frequency of both epigenetic alterations in PanNETs to assess the relationship between methylation profiles and chromosomal instability, tumour phenotypes and prognosis. Methods: In a well-characterized series of 56 sporadic G1 and G2 PanNETs, methylation-sensitive multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification was performed to assess hypermethylayion of 33 genes and copy number alterations (CNAs) of 53 chromosomal regions. Long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) hypomethylation was quantified by pyrosequencing. Results: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering allowed to identify a subset of 22 PanNETs (39%) exhibiting high frequency of gene-specific methylation and low CNA percentages. This tumour cluster was significantly associated with stage IV (p = 0.04) and with poor prognosis in univariable analysis (p = 0.004). LINE-1 methylation levels in PanNETs were significantly lower than in normal samples (p < 0.01) and were approximately normally distributed. 12 tumours (21%) were highly hypomethylated, showing variable levels of CNA. Interestingly, only 5 PanNETs (9%) were observed to show simultaneously LINE-1 hypomethylation and high frequency of gene-specific methylation. LINE-1 hypomethylation was strongly correlated with advanced stage (p = 0.002) and with poor prognosis (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, low LINE-1 methylation status and methylation clusters were the only independent significant predictors of outcome (p = 0.034 and p = 0.029, respectively). Conclusion: The combination of global DNA hypomethylation and gene hypermethylation analyses may be useful to define distinct subsets of PanNETs. Both alterations are common in PanNETs and could be directly correlated with tumour progression.

Methylation-specific multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) is a fast, new, inexpensive method that has rarely been exploited in DNA methylation profiling of colorectal cancers (CRCs). The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic utility of MS-MLPA to evaluate the methylation status of 34 genes in normal colonic mucosa samples and in a well-characterized series of 83 adenocarcinomas and 21 neuroendocrine carcinomas of colon-rectum. Two commercial MS-MLPA kits (SALSA MS-MLPA ME001-C1 Tumor suppressor-1 Kit and SALSA MS-MLPA ME002-B1 Tumor suppressor-2 Kit) were used to perform promoter methylation analysis on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. MS-MLPA analysis was validated by bisulfite pyrosequencing, bisulfite cycle sequencing, and methylation-specific PCR. MS-MLPA analysis identified a subset of 27 CRCs (26 % of cases) showing high levels of gene methylation involving a mean percentage of 34 % of the promoters examined. These tumors exhibited all the main clinicopathological and genetic features described for CRCs with CpG island Methylator Phenotype-High. High levels of methylation were observed with similar frequency in adenocarcinomas and in neuroendocrine carcinomas (25 % versus 29 %, respectively), but different methylation profiles were observed in the two tumor types. In both groups, tumors with microsatellite instability and widespread methylation represented a homogeneous clinicopathological entity. MS-MLPA assay is an easy and reliable system for epigenetic characterization of tumor tissues and leads to a rapid identification of CRCs with the highest levels of gene methylation. Aberrant gene methylation is a common abnormality in CRC initiation and may be observed in tumors with very different genetic and clinicopathological profiles.

EGFR-activating mutations predict responsiveness to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Mutation screening is crucial to support therapeutic decisions and is commonly conducted using dideoxy sequencing, although its sensitivity is suboptimal in clinical settings. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of pyrosequencing and dideoxy sequencing, we examined EGFR mutation status in a retrospective cohort of 53 patients with NSCLCs clinically selected for TKI therapy and whose clinical outcome was available. Moreover, pyrosequencing quantitative results were compared with EGFR amplification data. EGFR mutations were investigated by pyrosequencing and by dideoxy sequencing. Detection rates of both methods were determined by titration assays using NCI-H1975 and HCC-827 cell lines. Increased EGFR copy number was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Pyrosequencing showed a higher detection rate than dideoxy sequencing. Tumor control rate of cases with mutant and wild-type EGFR was 86% and 29%, respectively. EGFR amplification was significantly associated with EGFR mutation and a positive correlation between high percentages of mutant alleles and clinical response to TKI was observed. We concluded that pyrosequencing is more sensitive than dideoxy sequencing in mutation screening for EGFR mutations. Detection rate of dideoxy sequencing was suboptimal when low frequencies of mutant alleles or low tumor cell contents were observed. Pyrosequencing enables quantification of mutant alleles that correlates well with increased EGFR copy number assessed by FISH. Pyrosequencing should be used in molecular diagnostic of NSCLC to appropriately select patients who are likely to benefit from TKI therapy.

No abstract