BACKGROUND It is unknown whether warfarin or aspirin therapy is superior for patients with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm. METHODS We designed this trial to determine whether warfarin (with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) or aspirin (at a dose of 325 mg per day) is a better treatment for patients in sinus rhythm who have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We followed 2305 patients for up to 6 years (mean [±SD], 3.5±1.8). The primary outcome was the time to the first event in a composite end point of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or death from any cause. RESULTS The rates of the primary outcome were 7.47 events per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group and 7.93 in the aspirin group (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.10; P = 0.40). Thus, there was no significant overall difference between the two treatments. In a time-varying analysis, the hazard ratio changed over time, slightly favoring warfarin over aspirin by the fourth year of follow-up, but this finding was only marginally significant (P = 0.046). Warfarin, as compared with aspirin, was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of ischemic stroke throughout the follow-up period (0.72 events per 100 patient-years vs. 1.36 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82; P = 0.005). The rate of major hemorrhage was 1.78 events per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group as compared with 0.87 in the aspirin group (P<0.001). The rates of intracerebral and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (0.27 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin and 0.22 with aspirin, P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with reduced LVEF who were in sinus rhythm, there was no significant overall difference in the primary outcome between treatment with warfarin and treatment with aspirin. A reduced risk of ischemic stroke with warfarin was offset by an increased risk of major hemorrhage. The choice between warfarin and aspirin should be individualized.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether there is an optimal antithrombotic management for patients supported with axial-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Altogether, more than 758 papers were found using the reported search, of which 17 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. These included seven prospective and three retrospective cohort studies with a total of 538 patients with axial-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (HeartMate II, Jarvik 2000, INCOR, Thoratec assist device) implanted across the world as destination therapy or bridge to transplantation. We conclude that there is a substantial alteration of the prothrombotic profile in patients with axial-flow LVADs. These abnormalities appeared to be reversible with the removal of the device and are likely to be responsible for the high incidence of non-surgical bleeding episodes reported. Warfarin seems to offer a lower thromboembolic risk compared with unfractioned heparin or low molecular weight heparin. There are reports that suggest that managing axial-flow LVAD without anticoagulation, after major bleeding complications, is possible but in all probability, these papers are subject to publication bias as poor outcomes are unlikely to have been reported. All patients with axial-flow LVAD, showed severely impaired platelet function at point of care tests. The use of warfarin (INR target 2.5), in association with aspirin at 100 mg/day, or with point-of-care tests titrated antiplatelet therapy to inhibit 70%, seems to have the best bleeding-thrombosis, and in many cases a very small dose of aspirin of 25 mg twice a day and a dose of clopidogrel of 35 mg/day, were sufficient to achieve a reduction of the maximum aggregation to less than 30%. Finally, we would like to emphasize that such recommendations are addressed only to patients with axial-flow LVAD.

Left ventricular diastolic filling by Doppler echocardiography was investigated in 84 diabetic patients without evidence of heart disease and in 84 normotensive nondiabetic age- and sex-matched control subjects. Diabetic patients were subdivided into two groups on the basis of the presence of arterial hypertension. Group 1 comprised 41 normotensive diabetic patients (19 men, 22 women, mean age 63.7 +/- 9.1 years); Group 2 comprised 43 hypertensive diabetics (15 men, 28 women, mean age 65.6 +/- 9.6 years). Doppler measures of diastolic filling were significantly altered in the two groups as compared with control subjects. Peak atrial flow velocity, velocity integral for the atrial filling period, and atrial filling fraction were increased, whereas the ratio of peak early to peak atrial flow velocity and the ratio of flow velocity integrals were decreased, especially in Group 2 patients. Thirteen patients in Group 1 (32%) and 17 in Group 2 (40%) had evidence of diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by the presence of at least two independent abnormal indices (outside age-corrected 95% confidence interval). In each group, patients with altered diastolic filling differed slightly from diabetic patients with normal Doppler indices, tending to increased wall thickness and left ventricular mass. In conclusion, diastolic filling of the left ventricle is frequently altered in diabetic patients and is adversely affected by arterial hypertension whose coexistence further impairs left ventricular relaxation.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients with haemophilia undergoing cardiac surgery have good surgical outcomes. Haemophilia A and haemophilia B are sex-linked recessive inherited diseases affecting males only, with females acting as carriers. The conditions result in various degrees of factor VIII or factor IX deficiency, respectively. The life expectancy of haemophilia patients is increasing and now approaches that of the general male population, and they are confronted with age-related co-morbidity, including ischaemic cardiovascular disease. Replacement of the deficient factor (VIII for haemophilia A and IX for haemophilia B) is the cornerstone of treatment; other therapeutic options include tranexamic acid, desmopressin and aprotinin. Recently, the advent of recombinant factor VIII and IX has eliminated the infective risk of using factor concentrates, such as prothrombin complex concentrate or fresh frozen plasma. A total of 84 papers were found using the reported search criteria, and out of this 25 papers, selected with reference to a more modern date range, provided the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results were tabulated. We conclude that there is lack of good-quality evidence and that, in all probability, these papers are subject to publication bias as poor outcomes are unlikely to have been reported. However, all the reported series showed that good outcomes are possible in this specific subgroup of patients given the correct approach. The data accrued from these studies (a total of 30 adults and three children) suggest that routine cardiac surgery can be performed safely in patients with haemophilia, with minimal morbidity and mortality. We identified the following key points to achieve this result: a team approach, a factor replacement protocol and perioperative monitoring of factor levels. Intraoperative plasma factor levels can be easily measured before heparin and after protamine sulphate administration, whereas during cardiopulmonary bypass this will require a chromogenic method. Exposure to factor concentrates early in the life might predispose a patient with severe haemophilia to the development of inhibitors. Moreover, the absence of inhibitors should be confirmed before any surgical procedure.

Despite the large choice of wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy, deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) following cardiac surgery is a life-threatening complication worldwide. This study evaluated that the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied inside the sternotomy wound would reduce the effect of sternal wound infections, both superficial and deep. Between January 2007 and January 2012, 1093 consecutive patients underwent cardiac surgery through median sternotomy. Patients were divided into two groups. Group B, the study group, included those who received the PRP applied inside the sternotomy wound before closure. Group A, the control group, included patients who received a median sternotomy but without the application of PRP. Antibiotic prophylaxis remained unchanged across the study and between the two groups. Occurrence of DSWI was significantly higher in group A than in group B [10 of 671 (1·5%) versus 1 of 422 (0·20%), P = 0·043]. Also, superficial sternal wound infections (SSWIs) were significantly higher in group A than in group B [19 of 671 (2·8%) versus 2 of 422 (0·5%), P = 0·006]. The use of PRP can significantly reduce the occurrence of DSWI and SSWI in cardiac surgery.