The study aimed to nutritionally evaluate the silage of pineapple crop waste in sheep feeding in different planes of nutrition (L). We used eight growing sheep and four male castrated adults, in individual metabolic cages distributed in a switchback design with two treatments and three periods. The treatments were the different planes of nutrition: L = MEI⁄M m , MEI⁄1.5M m , and MEI⁄2.5M m , in which L = MEI/M m , MEI is the energy amount of the feed intake and M m is the maintenance. We performed a digestibility trial of the diet composed of silage of pineapple crop waste, ground corn, and soybean meal. Data were analyzed using regression analysis. Nutrient intake behaved linearly according to the increase in the L, except for organic matter, which presented a quadratic behavior. Planes of nutrition did not affect protein and fiber digestible fractions. However, digestible fractions of fat and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC) increased with L. The indigestible fractions displayed a quadratic behavior with an increase in the L. Regarding the microbial synthesis efficiency, we observed a linear decrease with the increase in L. Thus, the silage of pineapple crop waste is a feed very rich in NFC. Besides, silage of pineapple crop waste presented a good alternative roughage during forage shortages. Diet inclusion of 2.5x the maintenance does not compromise the sheep performance.
ResumoA maior parte da produção de leite e carne no Brasil é baseada em sistemas a pasto. A silagem é a forma mais antiga e tradicional de conservação de alimentos para alimentação animal. Quando se pensa em conservação de forrageiras úmidas, o milho é a forrageira mais tradicional. Há diversos fatores que contribuem para o sucesso da produção de silagem de milho entre eles destacam-se a escolha do híbrido, tratos culturais e principalmente o ponto de colheita e o processo de ensilagem. A produção de silagem de milho requer dos técnicos conhecimentos específicos em cada etapa do processo. Uma decisão errada durante o ciclo de produção pode causar perdas no sistema, que podem influenciar negativamente no rendimento financeiro.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the use of bacterial additive (Lactobacillus plantarum and Propionibacterium acidipropionici) on chemical composition, in vitro gas production, pH, losses, aerobic stability, and microbial population of corn, pearl millet, and sorghum silages in plastic bags silos (without vacuum). The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design, in a 2 × 3 factorial scheme, with or without additive ([Control] without additive and Lactobacillus plantarum [2.5 × 1010 cfu/g] and Propionibacterium acidipropionici [2.5 × 1010 cfu/g] Biomax corn, Lallemand, Saint-Simon, France [LP]) and three crops of agricultural interest; pearl millet, sorghum, and corn, with four replicates per treatment. We performed chemical analyses and in vitro gas production to determine the nutritional value of the silages. We also evaluated the aerobic stability, ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3), pH, and microbial population of the silages. The additive increased the crude protein content (P = 0.0062) in corn and sorghum and decreased the LIG content (P = 0.0567). The gas production was not affected (P > 0.05) by the additive and neither between crops. In aerobic stability, we observed that the additive affected the temperature of the sorghum silage (P = 0.0123). The additive decreased NH3 (P = 0.0095) content. The additive increased (P = 0.0441) the lactic acid bacteria population in the pearl millet, corn, and sorghum silages. Thus, the bacterial additive did not improve the fermentation profile and nutritional value of corn, pearl millet, and sorghum silages in plastic bag silos.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the biometric measurements and nutrient contents of the corn, sorghum, and pearl millet crops from 30 days after sowing up to ensiling time. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design, in which the three crops were evaluated with eight replicates. Stem height and diameter and leaf length and width were measured to determine plant growth. In addition, samples were collected to evaluate plant chemical composition. For the characterization of nutrient accumulation and biometric evaluation, linear and nonlinear models were used. Dry matter accumulation did not differ between corn and sorghum, but decreased in pearl millet from the fiftieth day up to ensiling. Crude protein, ashes, and neutral detergent fiber tend to reduce over time. The biometric variables do not differ between corn, pearl millet, and sorghum from 30 days after sowing until ensiling time.
RESUMO Objetivou-se avaliar o poder preditivo do modelo do National Research Council (NRC) para gado leiteiro em estimar o consumo de matéria seca (CMS) por vacas mestiças, em pastagens tropicais. Foi efetuada uma análise conjunta de cinco estudos, contemplando três forrageiras. Foram avaliadas 132 estimativas individuais do CMS observado (CMSObs), obtidas por meio do indicador externo Cr2O3. O CMS também foi predito por meio do software do NRC (CMSPred), que, por sua vez, foi abastecido com inputs referentes aos animais e ao ambiente de criação. Os valores de CMSPred (12,7±1,6kg/d) foram semelhantes aos de CMSObs (12,3±3,3kg/d). Foram obtidas as seguintes estimativas da avaliação do poder preditivo do modelo: viés médio (-0,419kg/d), coeficiente de determinação (0,029), coeficiente de correlação (0,17; P=,051), quadrado médio do erro de predição (11,844±20,034), fator de eficiência do modelo (-0,081), coeficiente de determinação do modelo (4,1032) e fator de correção do viés (0,767). A comparação entre CMSObs e CMSPred permitiu identificar a tendência de superestimação das predições se considerado o ajuste por meio de regressão robusta para o modelo linear simples sem intercepto. Nas condições avaliadas, o modelo produz predições de CMS com satisfatória exatidão, porém com baixa precisão.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.