Executive SummaryPrevious work looking at the returns to qualifications in Britain has generally focussed on the return to the highest qualification obtained by that individual. Almost all of this work has also grouped together 'similar' vocational and academic qualifications. From the small number of studies that have distinguished between academic and vocational qualifications, the evidence is mixed. It is therefore still unclear whether there are significant differences in the returns to academic and vocational qualifications. The only study that we are aware of for Britain, does, however argue that the returns to academic qualifications are higher than vocational qualifications at 'equivalent' levels. The paucity of evidence on this issue is a prime motivation behind this research.In this research we measure the impact of each qualification held by an individual on their earnings, as opposed to simply including the individual's highest qualification in the equation. For example, if an individual has both O levels and A levels, we include both sets of qualifications in the wage equation. We also use the most disaggregated qualification level possible. For instance, we do not group all the City and Guilds qualifications into one category but rather separate them into three. This approach is advantageous for two reasons. Firstly, we can add substantially to the economic literature on the returns to education by measuring the returns to particular qualifications that have not yet been evaluated, especially some vocational qualifications. Secondly, this approach means we can investigate the financial gain associated with different qualification profiles. In other words we can determine whether previous estimates of the average return to a particular qualification, such as a degree, hide differing returns depending on the route taken to acquire that qualification. For example, we can determine whether non-traditional HE students who do not have A levels earn a different return to their degree than those who enter HE via the A level system. The key findings are: •The additional returns associated with academic qualifications, taking no account of the time taken to acquire such qualifications, are typically higher than those associated with vocational qualifications at the same level.• When consideration is given to the time required to obtain the various qualifications, the returns per year of study for vocational qualifications move closer on average to those accruing to academic qualifications, although the extent of the variation in the former is higher.• Gender differences exist. With respect to academic qualifications, women tend to earn a higher return than men do, particularly to degrees. For vocational qualifications, men and women earn their highest returns with different types of qualifications. The vocational qualifications with the highest returns for men are HNC/HNDs, ONC/ONDs and higher level City and Guilds qualifications. For women, the vocational qualifications with the highest returns are teaching...
We suggest a methodology to calibrate a collective model with household specific bargaining rules and marriage specific preferences that incorporate leisure exter nalities. The empirical identification relies on the assumption that some aspects of indi vidual preferences remain the same after marriage, so that estimation on single individuals can be used. The procedure maps the complete Pareto frontier of each household in the dataset and we define alternative measures of a power index. The latter is then regressed on relevant bargaining factors, including a set of variables retracing the potential relative contributions of the spouses to household disposable income. In its capacity to handle complex budget sets and labor force participation decisions of both spouses, this frame work allows the comparison of unitary and collective predictions of labor supply reactions and welfare changes entailed by fiscal reforms in a realistic setting (see Michal Myck et al., 2006; Denis Beninger et al., 2006).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.