CMA increased detection rates and had a shorter turnaround time; therefore, late amniocentesis may serve as an extremely helpful tool for detecting abnormalities or reassuring parents following late appearing abnormal sonographic findings. However, CMA may expose uncertain findings for which the couple should be pre-counselled. The procedure appears safe. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

These findings suggest that deletion of VCX-A and NLGN4 can result in variable phenotypic features and that normal mental development can be achieved despite this deletion, emphasizing the importance of environmental factors and possible modifier genes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the choices of women with both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies who are undergoing prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a clinical setting regarding three challenging types of findings: variants of uncertain clinical significance, susceptibility loci for neurodevelopmental disorders, and copy number variants associated with risks for adult-onset conditions. We assessed whether women's choices were associated with indications for testing or with one-on-one pretest genetic counseling. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, medical records of women who underwent invasive prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis testing (N=1,070) at Hadassah Medical Center between June 2017 and February 2018 were examined for testing indications, choices regarding chromosomal microarray analysis findings, and type of pretest genetic counseling. Multivariable analyses to assess associations with testing indication and prior genetic counseling were carried out using logistic regression models. RESULTS: In total, 56% of women (n=593) chose to be informed of all three types of findings and 20% (n=218) chose not to be informed of any of the findings beyond high-penetrance childhood-onset pathogenic findings. Variants of uncertain clinical significance as a single choice was the least-selected finding (2.5%, n=27). Low-risk pregnancies (ie, those with normal biochemical screening and fetal ultrasound examinations) were associated with increased interest in receiving genetic information about adult-onset conditions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.7; 95% CI 1.18–2.33) and susceptibility loci (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.08–2.10). CONCLUSION: Women with both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies were generally more likely to choose to receive additional genetic information, albeit differences in preferences depend on testing indication and type of pretest counseling.

What are the novel findings of this work?We calculated the rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) findings in low-risk pregnancies, i.e. pregnancies with normal ultrasound (US) at the time of genetic testing, and found that the rate was relatively high. In addition, we documented later-appearing abnormal US findings and pregnancy outcome in these cases. What are the clinical implications of this work?The findings of this study allow an in-depth understanding of the yield of CMA and the impact of CMA results in pregnancies with normal US at the time of genetic testing. This may affect policy regarding CMA for low-risk pregnancies as well as counseling for prospective parents regarding the test and its possible results.

No abstract

In Israel, Krabbe disease is frequent in two Moslem Arab villages in the Jerusalem area. In this paper we present our experience of almost four decades with diagnosis of Krabbe disease, carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis. The screening program is well accepted by the community, and there is a clear trend towards premarital testing. The screening program and prenatal diagnosis have led to a decrease in the incidence of Krabbe disease from 1.6 per 1,000 live births to 0.82 per 1,000.

Mutations in more than 150 genes are responsible for inherited hearing loss, with thousands of different, severe causal alleles that vary among populations. The Israeli Jewish population includes communities of diverse geographic origins, revealing a wide range of deafness-associated variants and enabling clinical characterization of the associated phenotypes. Our goal was to identify the genetic causes of inherited hearing loss in this population, and to determine relationships among genotype, phenotype, and ethnicity. Genomic DNA samples from informative relatives of 88 multiplex families, all of self-identified Jewish ancestry, with either non-syndromic or syndromic hearing loss, were sequenced for known and candidate deafness genes using the HEar-Seq gene panel. The genetic causes of hearing loss were identified for 60% of the families. One gene was encountered for the first time in human hearing loss: ATOH1 (Atonal), a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor responsible for autosomal dominant progressive hearing loss in a five-generation family. Our results show that genomic sequencing with a gene panel dedicated to hearing loss is effective for genetic diagnoses in a diverse population. Comprehensive sequencing enables well-informed genetic counseling and clinical management by medical geneticists, otolaryngologists, audiologists, and speech therapists and can be integrated into newborn screening for deafness.

No abstract