In somatotroph pituitary tumours, somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy outcomes vary throughout the studies. We performed an analysis of cohort of patients with acromegaly from the Czech registry to identify new prognostic and predictive factors. Clinical data of patients were collected, and complex immunohistochemical assessment of tumour samples was performed (SSTR1‐5, dopamine D2 receptor, E‐cadherin, AIP). The study included 110 patients. In 31, SSA treatment outcome was evaluated. Sparsely granulated tumours (SGST) differed from the other subtypes in expression of SSTR2A, SSTR3, SSTR5 and E‐cadherin and occurred more often in young. No other clinical differences were observed. Trouillas grading system showed association with age, tumour size and SSTR2A expression. Factors significantly associated with SSA treatment outcome included age, IGF1 levels, tumour size and expression of E‐cadherin and SSTR2A. In the group of SGST, poor SSA response was observed in younger patients with larger tumours, lower levels of SSTR2A and higher Ki67. We observed no relationship with expression of other proteins including AIP. No predictive value of E‐cadherin was observed when tumour subtype was considered. Multiple additional factors apart from SSTR2A expression can predict treatment outcome in patients with acromegaly.

The influence of physical activity during a 3-h interruption of insulin pump treatment is evident, especially in the increase in plasma levels of non-esterified fatty acids and ketone bodies. Correction bolus leads to a rapid increase in insulinemia; however, normalization of blood glucose and ketone bodies is achieved within another 90 min.

IntroductionAt our institution, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been established as a technique for laparoscopic nephrectomy since 2011, and since 2012 in selected cases for adrenalectomy (AE) as well.AimTo compare LESS AE with standard laparoscopic AE (SLAE).Material and methodsBetween 3/2012 and 7/2014, 35 adrenalectomies were performed. In 18 (51.4%), a LESS approach was chosen. Indications were strictly non-complicated cases (body mass index (BMI) < 34 kg/m2, tumour ≤ 7 cm, non-malignant aetiology, no previous surgery). All LESS procedures were done by one surgeon. Standard equipment was a 10 mm rigid 0° camera, Triport+, one pre-bent grasper, and a sealing instrument. The approach was pararectal in all cases except one (transumbilical in a slim man). Three patients with LESS were excluded (2 partial AEs only, one adrenal cancer converted to SLAE and then to open surgery). These 15 LESS AE procedures were compared to 15 SLAEs with similar characteristics chosen among 54 SLAEs performed in the period 1/2008–2/2012.ResultsIn 8 cases (53.3%) of LESS AE, a 3 mm port was added to elevate the liver/spleen. Mean parameters of LESS AE vs. SLAE (Wilcoxon test): maximal tumour diameter 43.7 mm vs. 36.1 mm (p = 0.28), time of surgery 63.3 min vs. 55.3 min (p = 0.22), blood loss 38.0 ml vs. 38.0 ml (p = 0.38), BMI 26.9 kg/m2 vs. 28.5 kg/m2 (p = 0.13), discharge from hospital 5.4 days vs. 3.9 days (p = 0.038). There were no complications in either group.ConclusionsThe LESS AE is feasible in selected cases, especially small left-sided tumours in thin patients with no history of previous abdominal operations, but requires an additional port in half of the cases.

Aim. The aim of our retrospective study was to answer the question if the presence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) affects mortality in type 1 diabetic patients during a 10-year follow-up. Methods. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus examined for CAN in 2003 were enrolled in this retrospective study. A total of 278 patients were included and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of CAN (111 CAN+, 167 CAN-). The group characteristics and outcomes were compared at baseline and after ten years (in 2013). Results. In the follow-up period, a total of 18 patients died; CAN+ (14/111; 12.6%) and CAN-(4/167; 2.4%) (P < 0.001). At baseline, the CAN+ patients were older (47 vs. 33 years; P < 0.001), had longer duration of diabetes (20 vs. 12 years; P < 0.05), had worse glycemic control assessed by HbA1c (73 vs. 68 mmol/mol; P < 0.05), higher systolic (130 vs. 120 mmHg; P < 0.001) and diastolic (80 vs. 70 mmHg; P < 0.01) blood pressure and had more diabetic complications. In our analysis we found the strongest predictor of mortality to be the presence of CAN (P < 0.01) and the blood pressure value at baseline (P < 0.05). Other baseline characteristics, including the duration of diabetes, age and the presence of micro-and macrovascular complications were not significant. The statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression step-wise analysis. Conclusions. During the 10-year follow-up, CAN+ patients had a 5-fold higher mortality rate than CAN-patients. The strongest predictor of mortality was the presence of CAN.