No abstract

We explore the task of automatic assessment of argument quality. To that end, we actively collected 6.3k arguments, more than a factor of five compared to previously examined data. Each argument was explicitly and carefully annotated for its quality. In addition, 14k pairs of arguments were annotated independently, identifying the higher quality argument in each pair. In spite of the inherent subjective nature of the task, both annotation schemes led to surprisingly consistent results. We release the labeled datasets to the community. Furthermore, we suggest neural methods based on a recently released language model, for argument ranking as well as for argument-pair classification. In the former task, our results are comparable to state-of-the-art; in the latter task our results significantly outperform earlier methods. * These authors equally contributed to this work. 1 For more details:https://www.research. ibm.com/artificial-intelligence/ project-debater/live/

No abstract

Social network sites rely on the contributions of their members to create a lively and enjoyable space. Recent research has focused on using personalization and recommender technologies to encourage participation of existing members. In this work we present an early-intervention approach to encouraging participation and engagement, which makes recommendations to new users during their sign-up process. Our recommender system exploits external social media to produce people and profile entry recommendations for new users. We present results of a live user study, showing that users who received recommendations at sign-up created more social connections, contributed more content, and were on the whole more engaged with the system, contributing more without prompt and returning more often. We further show that recommendations for multiple content types yield significantly better results, in terms of user contribution and consumption; and that recommendations of more active users yield a higher return rate.

No abstract