Infants with a high-risk distribution of port-wine stains are commonly screened for Sturge-Weber syndrome using brain magnetic resonance imaging. There is no consensus about which port-wine stain phenotypes to screen, optimal timing, screening sensitivity, or whether presymptomatic diagnosis improves neurodevelopmental outcomes. This state-of-the-art review examines the evidence in favor of screening for Sturge-Weber syndrome, based on its effect on neurodevelopmental outcomes, against the risks and limitations of screening magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted between January 2005 and May 2017 using key search terms. Relevant articles published in English were reviewed; 34 articles meeting the search criteria were analyzed according to the following outcome measures: neurodevelopmental outcome benefit of screening, diagnostic yield, financial costs, procedural risks, and limitations of screening magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. There is no evidence that a presymptomatic Sturge-Weber syndrome diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging results in better neurodevelopmental outcomes. The utility of electroencephalographic screening is also unestablished. In Sturge-Weber syndrome, neurodevelopmental outcomes depend on prompt recognition of neurologic red flags and early seizure control. Small numbers and a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials limit these findings. For infants with port-wine stain involving skin derived from the frontonasal placode (forehead and hemifacial phenotypes), we recommend early referral to a pediatric neurologist for parental education, counselling, and monitoring for neurologic red flags and seizures and consideration of electroencephalography regardless of whether magnetic resonance imaging is performed or its findings. K E Y W O R D Selectroencephalography, epilepsy, magnetic resonance imaging, neurodevelopmental outcomes, port-wine stain, screening, Sturge-Weber syndrome

Findings from this small cohort of individuals with port-wine stains that put them at high risk of Sturge-Weber syndrome suggest that children with positive screening magnetic resonance imaging will almost certainly develop Sturge-Weber syndrome but that negative screening magnetic resonance imaging cannot exclude Sturge-Weber syndrome (in up to 23.1% of cases). False-negative magnetic resonance imaging may delay seizure recognition. Seizure education, monitoring, and consideration of adjunctive electroencephalography are important irrespective of magnetic resonance imaging findings.

SummaryBackground Despite limited evidence, woollen clothing has traditionally been considered to be an irritant that should be avoided by individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD). Wool fibres come in a range of diameters, and have beneficial thermodynamic and moisture transport properties. Objectives This study examines the effects of superfine merino wool on symptoms in participants with mild-to-moderate AD. Methods The trial was a 12-week, randomized, assessor-blinded, crossover, prospective, cohort study of 39 patients with mild-to-moderate AD, aged between 4 weeks and 3 years, comparing superfine merino wool ensembles with standard cotton clothing chosen by parents. Participants were assigned to wool or cotton clothing and assessed every 3 weeks for 6 weeks, before crossing over to wear the other clothing material for a further 6-week period, with similar 3-weekly reviews. The primary end point was the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index after each 6-week period, with Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI), Infants' Dermatitis Quality Of Life Index (IDQOL) and topical steroid use as secondary end points to measure AD severity and quality of life. Results Overall, compared with baseline, superfine wool ensembles were associated with a reduction in mean SCORAD of 2Á5 [95% confidence interval (CI) À4Á7 to À0Á4] at 3 weeks and 7Á6 (95% CI À10Á4 to À4Á8) at 6 weeks when compared with the cotton ensembles. A similar change was observed in ADSI and IDQOL scores for the same period. Body steroid use was also reduced. Conversely, changing ensembles from wool to cotton resulted in an increase in scores. Conclusions Superfine merino wool may assist in the management of childhood AD.

Although wool is commonly believed to cause irritant (non-immune) and hypersensitivity (immune) cutaneous reactions, the evidence basis for this belief and its validity for modern garments have not been critically examined. Publications from the last 100 years, using MEDLINE and Google Scholar, were analysed for evidence that wool causes cutaneous reactions, both immune-mediated (atopic dermatitis exacerbation, contact urticaria, allergic contact dermatitis) and non-immune-mediated (irritant contact dermatitis, itch). Secondary aims of this paper were to examine evidence that lanolin and textile-processing additives (formaldehyde, chromium) cause cutaneous reactions in the context of modern wool-processing techniques. Current evidence does not suggest that wool-fibre is a cutaneous allergen. Furthermore, contact allergy from lanolin, chromium and formaldehyde is highly unlikely with modern wool garments. Cutaneous irritation from wool relates to high fibre diameters (≥ 30-32 µm). Superfine and ultrafine Merino wool do not activate sufficient c-fibres to cause itch, are well tolerated and may benefit eczema management.

medical referrals, and requests relating to congestive heart failure. This audit demonstrates that the SCDHB falls short of providing TTEs within expected timeframes for all priorities of requests, with waiting times often prolonged. Implementation of change is necessary if the SCDHB is to provide TTEs within timeframes desired for optimal patient care.

This project was supported by cooperative research from Cathay General Hospital (CGH-MR-A10821). Its contents were solely the responsibility of the authors and did not necessarily represent the official views of the donor.