OBJECTIVEPublication metrics such as the Hirsch index (h-index) are often used to evaluate and compare research productivity in academia. The h-index is not a field-normalized statistic and can therefore be dependent on overall rates of publication and citation within specific fields. Thus, a metric that adjusts for this while measuring individual contributions would be preferable. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new, field-normalized, article-level metric called the “relative citation ratio” (RCR) that can be used to more accurately compare author productivity between fields. The mean RCR is calculated as the total number of citations per year of a publication divided by the average field-specific citations per year, whereas the weighted RCR is the sum of all article-level RCR scores over an author’s career. The present study was performed to determine how various factors, such as academic rank, career duration, a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree, and sex, impact the RCR to analyze research productivity among academic neurosurgeons.METHODSA retrospective data analysis was performed using the iCite database. All physician faculty affiliated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited neurological surgery programs were eligible for analysis. Sex, career duration, academic rank, additional degrees, total publications, mean RCR, and weighted RCR were collected for each individual. Mean RCR and weighted RCR were compared between variables to assess patterns of analysis by using SAS software version 9.4.RESULTSA total of 1687 neurosurgery faculty members from 125 institutions were included in the analysis. Advanced academic rank, longer career duration, and PhD acquisition were all associated with increased mean and weighted RCRs. Male sex was associated with having an increased weighted RCR but not an increased mean RCR score. Overall, neurological surgeons were highly productive, with a median RCR of 1.37 (IQR 0.93–1.97) and a median weighted RCR of 28.56 (IQR 7.99–85.65).CONCLUSIONSThe RCR and its derivatives are new metrics that help fill in the gaps of other indices for research output. Here, the authors found that advanced academic rank, longer career duration, and PhD acquisition were all associated with increased mean and weighted RCRs. Male sex was associated with having an increased weighted, but not mean, RCR score, most likely because of historically unequal opportunities for women within the field. Furthermore, the data showed that current academic neurosurgeons are exceptionally productive compared to both physicians in other specialties and the general scientific community.

Objective True pediatric emergencies are rare. Because resident work hours are restricted and national attention turns toward patient safety, teaching methods to improve physician performance and patient care are vital. We hypothesize that a critical-care simulation course will improve resident confidence and performance in critical-care situations. Interventions We developed a monthly pediatric intensive care unit simulation course for second-year pediatric residents that consisted of weekly 1-hour sessions during both of the residents' month-long pediatric intensive care unit rotations. All scenarios used high-fidelity pediatric simulators and immediate videotape-assisted debriefing sessions. In addition, simulated intraosseous line insertion and endotracheal intubations were also performed. Results All residents improved their comfort level and confidence in performing individual key resuscitation tasks. The largest improvements were seen with their perceived ability to intubate children and place intraosseous lines. Both of these skills improved from baseline and compared to third-year-resident controls who had pediatric intensive care unit rotations but no simulations (P = .05 and P = .07, respectively). Videotape reviews showed only 54% ± 12% of skills from a scenario checklist performed correctly. Conclusions Our simulation-based pediatric intensive care unit training course improves second-year pediatric residents' comfort level but not performance during codes, as well as their perceived intubation and intraosseous ability. Videotape reviews show discordance between objective performance and self-assessment. Further work is necessary to elucidate the reasons for this difference as well as the appropriate role for simulation in the new graduate medical education climate, and to create new teaching modalities to improve resident performance.

Translocations between <i>EWSR1</i> and members of the CREB family of transcription factors (<i>CREB1</i>, <i>ATF1</i>, and <i>CREM</i>) are rare genetic findings occurring in various sarcomas. Of these, the <i>EWSR1-CREM</i> translocation is the most rarely reported. We present the case of a 9-year-old boy who presented with a year of fatigue, weight loss, and abulia. A brain MRI revealed a frontal interhemispheric tumor arising from the falx. After resection, pathology demonstrated a myxoid mesenchymal tumor with an <i>EWSR1-CREM</i> translocation. A series of recent reports of similar tumors has generated ongoing debate in the literature over the classification of these tumors either as intracranial angiomatoid fibrous histiocytomas, which also harbor <i>EWSR1</i>-CREB family translocations, or as a novel diagnostic entity. The present case provides another example of the rare <i>EWSR1-CREM</i> fusion in an intracranial myxoid mesenchymal tumor that recurred in just 6 months despite gross total resection. The findings are discussed in the context of the existing literature and the ongoing effort to appropriately classify this type of tumor.

If the incidence of SJS-spectrum is approximately uniform the world-over, extrapolation from the US figure would amount to approximately 86,500 new cases per year in the world. Extrapolation of ocular chemical burns to the world is difficult because the incidence and severity are anticipated to be higher in the developing world than in the United States. Still, using a US incidence rate, a minimum of 357,710 burn accidents would be expected to occur worldwide every year; there are presently too few data available to calculate the degree of severity and bilaterality.

No abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> We sought to compare our large single-institution cohort of postnatal myelomeningocele closure to the 2 arms of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial at the designated trial time points, as well as assess outcomes at long-term follow-up among our postnatal cohort. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-institutional retrospective review of myelomeningocele cases presenting from 1995 to 2015 at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh was performed. We compared outcomes at 12 and 30 months to both arms of the MOMS trial and compared our cohort’s outcomes at those designated time points to our long-term outcomes. Univariate statistical analysis was performed as appropriate. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One-hundred sixty-three patients were included in this study. All patients had at least 2-year follow-up, with a mean follow-up of 10 years (range 2–20 years). There was no difference in the overall distribution of anatomic level of defect. Compared to our cohort, the prenatal cohort had a higher rate of tethering at 12 months of age, 8 versus 1.8%. Conversely, the Chiari II decompression rate was higher in our cohort (10.4 vs. 1.0%). At 30 months, the prenatal cohort had a higher rate of independent ambulation, but our cohort demonstrated the highest rate of ambulation with or without assistive devices among the 3 groups. When comparing our cohort at these early time points to our long-term follow-up data, our cohort’s ambulatory function decreased from 84 to 66%, and the rate of detethering surgery increased almost 10-fold. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study demonstrated that overall ambulation and anatomic-functional level were significantly better among our large postnatal cohort, as well as having significantly fewer complications to both fetus and mother, when compared to the postnatal cohort of the MOMS trial. Our finding that ambulatory ability declined significantly with age in this patient population is worrisome for the long-term outcomes of the MOMS cohorts, especially given the high rates of cord tethering at early ages within the prenatal cohort. These findings suggest that the perceived benefits of prenatal closure over postnatal closure may not be as substantial as presented in the original trial, with the durability of results still remaining a concern.

Background Simulation is an effective method for teaching clinical skills but has not been widely adopted to educate trainees about how to teach. Objective We evaluated a curriculum for pediatrics fellows by using high-fidelity simulation (mannequin with vital signs) to improve pedagogical skills. Intervention The intervention included a lecture on adult learning and active-learning techniques, development of a case from the fellows' subspecialties, and teaching the case to residents and medical students. Teaching was observed by an educator using a standardized checklist. Learners evaluated fellows' teaching by using a structured evaluation tool; learner evaluations and the observer checklist formed the basis for written feedback. Changes in fellows' pedagogic knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported skills were analyzed by using Friedman and Wilcoxon rank-sum test at baseline, immediate postintervention, and 6-month follow-up. Results Forty fellows participated. Fellows' self-ratings significantly improved from baseline to 6-month follow-up for development of learning objectives, effectively reinforcing performance, using teaching techniques to promote critical thinking, providing constructive feedback, and using case studies to teach general rules. Fellows significantly increased agreement with the statement “providing background and context is important” (4.12 to 4.44, P  =  .02). Conclusions Simulation was an effective means of educating fellows about teaching, with fellows' attitudes and self-rated confidence improving after participation but returning to baseline at the 6-month assessment. The simulation identified common weaknesses of fellows as teachers, including failure to provide objectives to learners, failure to provide a summary of key learning points, and lack of inclusion of all learners.

OBJECTIVEStand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a useful minimally invasive approach for select spinal disorders, but implant subsidence may occur in up to 30% of patients. Previous studies have suggested that wider implants reduce the subsidence rate. This study aimed to evaluate whether a mismatch of the endplate and implant area can predict the rate and grade of implant subsidence.METHODSThe authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF between July 2008 and June 2015; 297 patients (623 surgical levels) met inclusion criteria. Imaging studies were examined to grade graft subsidence according to Marchi criteria. Thirty patients had radiographic evidence of implant subsidence. The endplates above and below the implant were measured.RESULTSA total of 30 patients with implant subsidence were identified. Of these patients, 6 had Marchi grade 0, 4 had grade I, 12 had grade II, and 8 had grade III implant subsidence. There was no statistically significant correlation between the endplate-implant area mismatch and subsidence grade or incidence. There was also no correlation between endplate-implant width and length mismatch and subsidence grade or incidence. However, there was a strong correlation between the usage of the 18-mm-wide implants and the development of higher-grade subsidence (p = 0.002) necessitating surgery. There was no significant association between the degree of mismatch or Marchi subsidence grade and the presence of postoperative radiculopathy. Of the 8 patients with 18-mm implants demonstrating radiographic subsidence, 5 (62.5%) required reoperation. Of the 22 patients with 22-mm implants demonstrating radiographic subsidence, 13 (59.1%) required reoperation.CONCLUSIONSThere was no correlation between endplate-implant area, width, or length mismatch and Marchi subsidence grade for stand-alone LLIF. There was also no correlation between either endplate-implant mismatch or Marchi subsidence grade and postoperative radiculopathy. The data do suggest that the use of 18-mm-wide implants in stand-alone LLIF may increase the risk of developing high-grade subsidence necessitating reoperation compared to the use of 22-mm-wide implants.