Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare technical success, patency rates and clinical outcomes of vein bypass (VBP) with angioplasty and nitinol stents (NS) in femoropopliteal Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) II C and D lesions. Summary Background Data: Guidelines widely recommend an endovascular-first strategy for long femoropopliteal lesions without sufficient data comparing it with vein bypass surgery. Methods: A single-center prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed, after approval of the local ethics committee, with technical success, primary and secondary patency as primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were limb salvage, survival, complications, and clinical improvement. Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 218 limbs (109 per group) in 209 patients were included. Baseline and lesion characteristics were similar in both groups with a mean lesion length of 268 mm. The indication for treatment was chronic limb threatening ischemia in 53% of limbs in both groups. Technical success was feasible in 88% in the stent group. During a 4-year follow-up, primary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularizations, limb salvage, survival and complications showed no significant differences between the groups. At 48 months secondary patency for the bypass group was 73% versus 50% in the stent group (P = 0.021). Clinical improvement was significantly superior in the bypass group with 52% versus 19% reaching a Rutherford 0 category (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This is the largest RCT comparing angioplasty with NS and vein bypass in femoropopliteal TASC II C and D lesions and the first to report 4-year results. The data underline the feasibility of endovascular treatment in long lesions but also emphasize the advantages of VBP.

Purpose Vascular injuries in lower extremity trauma, especially with involvement of the popliteal artery, are associated with considerably high rates of limb loss, especially with blunt trauma mechanisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of amputation in patients with traumatic popliteal artery lesions with special focus on the validity of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS). Methods In this retrospective study, all patients treated for isolated lesions of the popliteal artery following trauma between January 1990 and December 2020 at a high-volume level I trauma center were included. Primary outcome was limb salvage dependent on MESS and the influence of defined parameters on limb salvage was defined as secondary outcome. The extent of trauma was assessed by the MESS. Results A total of 50 patients (age 39.2 ± 18.6 years, 76% male) with most blunt injuries (n = 47, 94%) were included. None of the patients died within 30 days and revascularization was attempted in all patients with no primary amputation and the overall limb salvage rate was 88% (44 patients). A MESS ≥ 7 was observed in 28 patients (56%) with significantly higher rates of performed fasciotomies (92.9% vs. 59.1%; p < 0.01) in those patients. MESS did not predict delayed amputation within our patient cohort (MESS 8.4 ± 4.1 in the amputation group vs. 8.1 ± 3.8 in the limb salvage group; p = 0.765). Conclusion Revascularization of limbs with isolated popliteal artery injuries should always be attempted. MESS did not predict delayed amputation in our cohort with fasciotomy being an important measure to increase limb salvage rates.

Introduction: Compartment syndrome of the lower extremity following arterial vascular trauma can cause irreversible damage to muscle as well as nerve tissue leading to long-term functional impairment of the extremity or worse limb loss. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of compartment syndrome is mandatory to preserve muscle tissue and prevent limb loss. The aim of the study was to analyze the fasciotomy rate of our patient cohort and to perform a predictors analysis for the need of fasciotomy. Material and Methods:In a retrospective study all patients treated for arterial vascular trauma since 1990 were identified. Demographics, clinical data and outcome were analysed. After separation in a fasciotomy and non-fasciotomy group, a Bayes Network was used to arrive at a predictor ranking for the need of fasciotomy via a gain ratio feature evaluation.Results: In the period of 28 years, 88 (73.9%) of a total of 119 patients, predominantly male (80.7%) and aged under 40 years (37.5 ± 17.5), required fasciotomy after arterial vascular trauma. Patients of the fasciotomy group presented at higher Rutherford categories (grade III 34.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.005), varied in terms of the type of arterial vascular injury (dissection 25% vs. 61.3%, p < 0.001, occlusion 15.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and showed prolonged hospitalization (35.17 ± 29.3 vs. 21.48 ±25.4, p = 0.002). Ischaemia duration exceeding 2.5 h followed by the Rutherford grade IIa and greater, the site (popliteal artery segment 3), type (transection and occlusion), and mechanism of vascular trauma (work related accident over traffic and sports accidents), as well as the male gender presented as strong predictors for fasciotomy.Conclusions: Arterial vascular trauma requiring fasciotomy for compartment syndrome accounted for 73.9% of all cases. Immediate diagnosis and treatment is mandatory to prevent long-term functional impairment or limb loss. The above mentioned predictors should help identifying patients at risk for developing a compartment syndrome to provide best possible treatment.

Background & objective: Arterial vascular trauma bears a great risk of poor functional outcome or limb loss. The aim of this study was to analyze amputation rates of patients after vascular trauma and to perform a predictor analysis for the risk of major amputation. Methods: In a single-center retrospective analysis of 119 extremities treated for arterial vascular injury between 1990 and 2018 amputation rates and factors associated with limb loss were assessed. All patients were treated for traumatic vascular injuries; iatrogenic injuries were not included in the study. Results: During the study period, a total of 119 legs in 118 patients were treated after arterial vascular trauma. The in-hospital major amputation rate was 16.8% and the mortality rate was 2.5%. In the predictors analysis, vascular re-operation (amputation rate 53.8% vs 12%, odds ratio = 8.56), a Rutherford category ⩾IIb (25.4% vs 4.2%, odds ratio = 6.43), work-related or traffic accidents (28.2% vs 0%, odds ratio = 4.86), concomitant soft tissue or bone injuries (26.7% vs 7.3%, odds ratio = 4.64), polytrauma (33.3% vs 12%, odds ratio = 3.68), and blunt trauma (18.9% vs 0% for penetrating trauma, odds ratio = 1.64) were found to be associated with amputation. Conclusions: Lower extremity arterial vascular trauma was associated with a significant major amputation rate. Several predictors for limb loss were identified, which could aid in identifying patients at risk and adapting their treatment.