Introduction: Some studies have shown that women with a previous cesarean section, compared with women with a previous vaginal delivery, have an increased risk of retained placenta during a subsequent vaginal delivery. It is unknown whether this is mediated by anterior placental location, when the placenta might cover the uterine scar. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the increased risk of retained placenta in women with a previous cesarean section is mediated by anterior placental location. Material and methods: This is a population-based cohort study, with data from the regional population-based Stockholm-Gotland Obstetric Cohort, Sweden, from 2008 to 2014. The overall study population included 49 598 women with a vaginal second delivery, where adequate information about placental location from the secondtrimester ultrasound scan was available. For the main analysis, including the 3921 women with a previous cesarean section, we calculated the relative risk of retained placenta in women with an anterior placental location, using women with non-anterior placental locations as reference. Relative risks were calculated as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. In a second model, adjustments were made for maternal age, height, country of birth, smoking in early pregnancy, infant sex, and in vitro fertilization. Results: In the overall study population, the rate of retained placenta at the second delivery was 2.0%. The proportion of women with a retained placenta was higher among women with a previous cesarean compared with those with a previous vaginal delivery (3.4% vs 1.9%; P < .0001). In the main analysis, including women with a previous cesarean section, the risk for retained placenta was not increased with anterior compared with non-anterior placental location (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60-1.20). Adjustments did not affect the estimates in a significant way. Conclusions: The increased risk of retained placenta in women with a previous cesarean section is not mediated by anterior placental location. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

A population-based cohort study suggests that there is an intergenerational recurrence of retained placenta.

Introduction Fetal growth assessment by ultrasound is an essential part of modern obstetric care. The formula by Persson and Weldner for estimated fetal weight (EFW), used in Sweden since decades, has not yet been evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate accuracy and precision of the formula by Persson and Weldner, and to compare it to two other formulae using biparietal diameter instead of head circumference. Material and methods The study population consisted of 31 521 singleton pregnancies delivered at 22+0 gestational weeks or later, with an ultrasound EFW performed within 2 days before delivery, registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register between 2014 and 2021. Fetal biometric ultrasound measurements were used to calculate EFW according to the formulae by Persson and Weldner, Hadlock 2 and Shepard. Bland–Altman analysis, systematic error (mean percentage error), random error (standard deviation [SD] of mean percentage error), proportion of weight estimates within ±10% of birthweight, and proportion with underestimated and overestimated weight was calculated. Moreover, calculations were made after stratification into small, appropriate, and large for gestational age (SGA, AGA and LGA), respectively, and gestational age at examination. Results For the formula by Persson and Weldner, MPE was −2.7 (SD 8.9) and the proportion of EFW within ±10% from actual birthweight was 76.0%. MPE was largest for fetuses estimated as severe SGA (<3rd percentile, −5.4) and for the most preterm fetuses (<24 weeks, −5.4). For Hadlock 2 and Shepard's formulae, MPE were 3.9 (SD 8.9) and 3.4 (SD 9.7), respectively, and the proportions of EFW within ±10% from actual birthweight were 69.4% and 67.1%, respectively. MPE was largest for fetuses estimated as severe LGA (>97th percentile), 7.6 and 9.4, respectively. Conclusions The recommended Swedish formula by Persson and Weldner is generally accurate for fetal weight estimation. The systematic underestimation of EFW and random error is largest in extreme preterm and estimated SGA‐fetuses, which is of importance in clinical decision making. The accuracy of EFW with the formula by Persson and Weldner is as good as or better than Hadlock 2 and Shepard's formulae.