Differential display screening was used to reveal differential gene expression between the tumorigenic breast cancer cell line CAL51 and nontumorigenic microcell hybrids obtained after transfer of human chromosome 17 into CAL51. The human profilin 1 (PFN1) gene was found overexpressed in the microcell hybrid clones compared with the parental line, which displayed a low profilin 1 level. A comparison between several different tumorigenic breast cancer cell lines with nontumorigenic lines showed consistently lower profilin 1 levels in the tumor cells. Transfection of PFN1 cDNA into CAL51 cells raised the profilin 1 level, had a prominent effect on cell growth, cytoskeletal organization and spreading, and suppressed tumorigenicity of the stable, PFN1-overexpressing cell clones in nude mice. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed intermediate and low levels of profilin 1 in different human breast cancers. These results suggest profilin 1 as a suppressor of the tumorigenic phenotype of breast cancer cells.

Retrospective study, Level III.

No abstract

No abstract

Infection of Chinese hamster cells with SV 40 DNA gives rise to mutants resistant both to S-axaguanine (AG) and aminopterin (AP). This mutagenic effect can be raised when facilitating DNA uptake of cells by a helper agent. The extent of muyagenic action depends further on the concentration of DNA applied to the cells, with 2 micrograms/ml being more effective than 10 micrograms/ml, as well as on the period of incubation of infected cells before onset of mutant selection (mutation expression time). Using the AG resistance marker the mutation frequency can be increased more than 8-fold compared with the spontaneous mutation frequency. Reconstituted SV 40 minichromosomes show a mutagenic action which is similar to the DNA-mediated mutagensis whereas non-viral DNA from mammalian cells fails to induce mutations significantly. A major part of isolated clones of SV 40-induced mutants tested so far does express SV 40 T-antigen, suggesting the persistence of SV 40 genetic material in these clones. The possible existence of relations between mutagenic and transforming capacities of SV 40 is discussed.

We present data suggesting that human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV, widely distributed throughout human populations, are able to induce gene mutations in cultured cells. In this study, using different infecting agents, cell lines to be infected, mutation expression periods, and selection systems, we observed mutagenic effects of varying extent with values of spontaneous mutant frequencies being increased after BKV infection up to 100-fold in BHK cells (6-thioguanine resistance) and nearly 35-fold in virus-transformed human Lesch-Nyhan cells (ouabain resistance). In experiments with BKV the viral mutagenic potential was found to be raised both in moderately uv-irradiated cells, or when wild-type virus was replaced by the variant BKV-IR isolated from a human tumor. Since BKV-IR is defective in the expression of small-t antigen, the viral mutagenicity does not require this protein to be active. BKV was shown to mutate, besides different established cell lines, human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Moreover, as demonstrated by comparing mutagenicities of DNAs from BKV, JCV, and the related polyomavirus SV40, the mutagenic effects of the three viruses do not appear to be essentially different. Implications of these findings are discussed.

No abstract

For the first time, combined immunophenotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique according to the "fluorescence immunophenotyping and interphase cytogenetics as a tool for investigation of neoplasms" (FICTION) technique have been successfully applied in solid tumors. Thus, we were able to visualize the antigen expression of cells with chromosomal deletions of a tumor suppressor region directly. In six breast carcinoma cell lines, we investigated the correlation between estrogen receptor (ER) expression status and deletions of the estrogen receptor gene (ESR). To screen for deletions of the ESR gene, dual-color FISH was performed with a YAC (yeast artificial chromosome) probe containing the ESR gene and, as internal control, with a centromeric probe of chromosome 6. Deletions of the ESR gene were detected in four of six cell lines. For direct comparison of ER expression with the copy number of the ESR gene at the single cell level, immunophenotyping with mouse anti-human ER antibody was combined with FISH with the YAC probe containing the ESR gene according to the FICTION technique. There was no correlation between lack of or reduced ER expression and deletions of the ESR gene. One cell line with deletions of the ESR gene did express ER on the protein level, while another cell line without a deletion did not. Cells with deletions of the ESR gene were either ER expression positive or negative. The staining intensity of ER expression was not associated with the copy number of the ESR gene. Thus, this FICTION study unequivocally shows that deletions of the ESR gene are not the major cause of absent or reduced ER expression in breast carcinoma cell lines.