No abstract

Design: Systematic review. Objective: To conduct a systematic review to (1) summarize various classification systems used to describe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and (2) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities and the reliability of these classification systems.Methods: A search was performed to identify studies that used a classification system to categorize patients with OPLL. Furthermore, studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities or the reliability of a classification system.Results: A total of 167 studies were deemed relevant. Five classification systems were developed based on X-ray: the 9-classification system (0.60%); continuous, segmental, mixed, localized or focal, circumscribed and others (92.81%); hook, staple, bridge, and total types (2.40%); distribution of OPLL (2.40%); and K-line classification (4.19%). Six methods were based on computed tomography scans: free-type, contiguous-type, and broken sign (0.60%); hill-, plateau-, square-, mushroom-, irregular-, or round-shaped (5.99%); rectangular, oval, triangular, or pedunculate (1.20%); centralized or laterally deviated (1.80%); plank-, spindle-, or rod-shaped (0.60%); and rule of nine (0.60%). Classification systems based on 3-dimensional computed tomography were bridging and nonbridging (1.20%) and flat, irregular, and localized (0.60%). A single classification system was based on magnetic resonance imaging: triangular, teardrop, or boomerang. Finally, a variation of methods was used to classify OPLL associated with the dura mater (4.19%).

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No abstract

Study Design. Systematic review. Objective. This review aims to (1) outline how neurological complications and disease progression are defined in the literature and (2) evaluate the quality of definitions using a novel four-point rating system. Summary of Background Data. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive, degenerative spine disease that is often treated surgically. Although uncommon, surgical decompression can be associated with neurological complications, such as C5 nerve root palsy, perioperative worsening of myelopathy, and longer-term deterioration. Unfortunately, important questions surrounding these complications cannot be fully addressed due to the heterogeneity in definitions used across studies. Given this variability, there is a pressing need to develop guidelines for the reporting of surgical complications in order to accurately evaluate the safety of surgical procedures. Methods. An electronic database search was conducted in MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies that reported on complications related to DCM surgery and included at least 10 surgically treated patients. Data extracted included study design, surgical details, as well as definitions and rates of surgical complications. A four-point rating scale was developed to assess definition quality for each complication. Results. Our search yielded 2673 unique citations, 42 of which met eligibility criteria and were summarized in this review. Defined complications included neurological deterioration, late onset deterioration, perioperative worsening of myelopathy, C5 palsy, nerve root or upper limb palsy or radiculopathy, surgery failure, inadequate decompression and progression of ossified lesions. Reported rates of these complications varied substantially, especially those for neurological deterioration (0.2%–33.3%) and progression of ossified lesions (0.0%–86.7%). Conclusion. Reported incidences of various complications vary widely in DCM surgery, especially for neurological deterioration and progression of ossified lesions. This summary serves as a first step for standardizing definitions and developing guidelines for accurately reporting surgical complications. Level of Evidence: 2

No abstract

Study Design: Systematic review. Surgical decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with perioperative complications, including difficulty or discomfort with swallowing (dysphagia) as well as changes in sound production (dysphonia). This systematic review aims to (1) outline how dysphagia and dysphonia are defined in the literature and (2) assess the quality of definitions using a novel 4-point rating system. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted for studies that reported on dysphagia, dysphonia or other related complications of DCM surgery. Data extracted included study design, surgical details, as well as definitions and rates of surgical complications. A 4-point rating scale was developed to assess the quality of definitions for each complication. Results: Our search yielded 2,673 unique citations, 11 of which met eligibility criteria and were summarized in this review. Defined complications included odynophagia (n = 1), dysphagia (n = 11), dysphonia (n = 2), perioperative swelling complications (n = 2), and soft tissue swelling (n = 3). Rates of dysphagia varied substantially (0.0%-50.0%) depending on whether this complication was patient-reported (4.4%); patient-reported using a modified Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (43.1%) or the Bazaz criteria (8.8%-50.0%); or diagnosed using an extensive protocol consisting of clinical assessment, a bedside swallowing test, evaluation by a speech and language pathologist and a modified barium swallowing test/fiberoptic endoscopy (42.9%). The reported incidences of dysphonia also ranged significantly from 0.6% to 38.0%. Conclusion: There is substantial variability in reported rates of dysphagia and dysphonia due to differences in data collection methods, diagnostic strategies, and definitions. Consolidation of nomenclature will improve evaluation of the overall safety of surgery.

No abstract