The nature of intermolecular interactions between halogen atoms, X...X (X = Cl, Br, I), continues to be of topical interest because these interactions may be used as design elements in crystal engineering. Hexahalogenated benzenes (C6Cl(6-n)Br(n), C6Cl(6-n)I(n), C6Br(6-n)I(n)) crystallise in two main packing modes, which take the monoclinic space group P2(1)/n and the triclinic space group P1. The former, which is isostructural to C6Cl6, is more common. For molecules that lack inversion symmetry, adoption of this monoclinic structure would necessarily lead to crystallographic disorder. In C6Cl6, the planar molecules form Cl...Cl contacts and also pi...pi stacking interactions. When crystals of C6Cl6 are compressed mechanically along their needle length, that is, [010], a bending deformation takes place, because of the stronger interactions in the stacking direction. Further compression propagates consecutively in a snakelike motion through the crystal, similar to what has been suggested for the motion of dislocations. The bending of C6Cl6 crystals is related to the weakness of the Cl...Cl interactions compared with the stronger pi...pi stacking interactions. The triclinic packing is less common and is restricted to molecules that have a symmetrical (1,3,5- and 2,4,6-) halogen substitution pattern. This packing type is characterised by specific, polarisation-induced X...X interactions that result in threefold-symmetrical X3 synthons, especially when X = I; this leads to a layered pseudohexagonal structure in which successive planar layers are inversion related and stacked so that bumps in one layer fit into the hollows of the next in a space-filling manner. The triclinic crystals shear on application of a mechanical stress only along the plane of deformation. This shearing arises from the sliding of layers against one another. Nonspecificity of the weak interlayer interactions here is demonstrated by the structure of twinned crystals of these compounds. One of the compounds studied (1,3,5-tribromo-2,4,6-triiodobenzene) is dimorphic, adopting both the monoclinic and triclinic structures, and the reasons for polymorphism are suggested. To summarise, both chemical and geometrical models need to be considered for X...X interactions in hexahalogenated benzenes. The X...X interactions in the monoclinic group are nonspecific, whereas in the triclinic group some X...X interactions are anisotropic, chemically specific and crystal-structure directing.

Bending is observed in organic crystals when the packing is anisotropic in such a way that strong and weak interaction patterns occur in nearly perpendicular directions.

The first single-crystal diffraction studies on methane, propane, methane/propane, and adamantane gas hydrates SI, SII, and SH have been performed. To circumvent the problem of very slow crystal growth, a novel technique of in situ cocrystallization of gases and liquids resulting in oligocrystalline material in a capillary has been developed. With special data treatment, termed oligo diffractometry, structural data of the gas hydrates of methane, acetylene, propane, a propane/ethanol/methane-mixture and an adamantane/methane-mixture were obtained. Cell parameters are in accord with reported values. Host network and guest are subject to extensive disorder, reducing the reliability of structural information. It was found that most cages are fully occupied by a guest molecule with the exception of the dodecahedral cage in the acetylene hydrate which is only filled to 60%. For adamantane in the icosahedral cage a disordered model is proposed.

No abstract

We thank Professor G. R. Desiraju for suggesting crystallization of pyridine-d¬5¬, and STFC for provision of neutron beam-time and a studentship for SC. RB gratefully acknowledges the support of the DFG FOR 618. [ † ] We dedicate this paper to Dr Frank Allen on the occasion of his retirement as Executive Director of the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Supporting information:Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org or from the author. Crystallographic information files can be obtained from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, quoting deposition numbers CCDC 695956 -695959. A summary table of crystal data is also given in the Supporting Information.

Acetylene is an amazingly versatile component for the formation of co-crystals. It requires careful handling and special techniques for crystallisation, but the efforts seem to be rewarding when attaining co-crystals with small molecules as partners. Many basic questions such as the dominance of specific heterogeneous intermolecular interactions, their driving force for the formation of multicomponent crystals instead of neat ones are expected to be easily analysed. The underlying packing patterns and resulting stoichiometries based on the known supramolecular synthons seem to be straightforward for such small molecules and crystal engineering, considered as the prototype of supramolecular synthesis, should be a simple task. Nineteen co-crystals with acetylene are presented in this paper, some of which have been previously reported individually. An attempt has been made to find features shared by the groups of co-crystals, including those that could not be co-crystallised. But in spite of clear ideas and experiences from previous experiments, surprisingly almost none of systems reached our expectations. Our intuitive approach was not fulfilled, which demonstrates that multicomponent crystals even of small molecules will remain a great challenge for theoretical methods and the crystal structures shown herein represent good candidates for future testing. On the other hand, we wish to encourage other groups to present their views on the crystal structures with an unbiased approach that may offer a better explanation than we are able to outline in this article.

For Edgar, a teacher whose influence will never stop The crystal structures of the low-melting 1,2-and 1,3-dichlorobenzene isomers have been determined by Xray analysis and in situ crystallisation techniques. Attempts to predict these structures in advance by force-field calculations were not successful, although the known crystal structures of two of the three polymorphs of the 1,4-isomer were successfully a posteriori predicted. Calculated lattice energies were supplemented with estimated lattice-vibrational entropies obtained in the rigid-body approximation. Energy calculations for actual and virtual crystal structures indicate that the higher melting point of the 1,4-isomer can be largely attributed to more efficient crystal packing.

The supramolecular synthon approach to crystal structure prediction (CSP) takes into account the complexities inherent in crystallization. The synthon is a kinetically favored unit, and through analysis of commonly occurring synthons in a group of related compounds, kinetic factors are implicitly invoked. The working assumption is that while the experimental structure need not be at the global minimum, it will appear somewhere in a list of computationally generated structures so that it can be suitably identified and ranked upward using synthon information. These ideas are illustrated with a set of aminophenols, or aminols. In the first stage, a training database is created of the 10 isomeric methylaminophenols. The crystal structures of these compounds were determined. The prototypes 2-, 3-, and 4-aminophenols were also included in the training database. Small and large synthons in these 13 crystal structures were then identified. Small synthons are of high topological but low geometrical value and are used in negative screens to eliminate computationally derived structures that are chemically unreasonable. Large synthons are more restrictive geometrically and are used in positive screens ranking upward predicted structures that contain these more well-defined patterns. In the second stage, these screens are applied to CSP of nine new aminols carried out in 14 space groups. In each space group, up to 10 lowest energy structures were analyzed with respect to their synthon content. The results are encouraging, and the predictions were classified as good, unclear, or bad. Two predictions were verified with actual crystal structure determinations.