Background Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery. Methods A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student‐ and trainee‐led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre‐specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury. Results A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57–75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1–3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non‐selective cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Conclusion NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.
Background Accurate epidemiological and outcomes data regarding cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) extending to the temporal bone is lacking. Methods Retrospective analysis of 167 Australian patients with primary and peri‐temporal bone cSCC. Results cSCC extending from secondary subsites (93.4%) was 14 times more frequent than primary temporal bone SCC (6.6%). For patients who underwent curative surgery ± post‐operative radiotherapy (n = 146, 87.4%), 5‐year disease‐free survival, locoregional recurrence‐free survival, disease‐specific survival, and overall survival was 53.0%, 59.4%, 67.9%, and 44.7%, respectively. External ear and pre‐auricular tumors, salvage surgery, tumor size (≥40 mm medial‐lateral), nodal disease, and involved margins were negative predictors of survival in multivariable analysis. Conclusion In regions of high sun exposure, cSCCs extending to the temporal bone are more common than primary cancers. Outcomes are improved with clear margins, justifying the need for radical resection. Further research regarding pre‐auricular cancers is required given poorer associated survival outcomes.
Background Malignancies in and around the temporal bone are aggressive and difficult to manage. In Queensland (Australia), where skin cancer rates are exceedingly high, tumours extending to the temporal bone from surrounding structures occur more commonly than primary cancers. Yet, a paucity of evidence exists as to their management and outcomes. This study aimed to review an Australian centre's experience of managing temporal and peritemporal bone malignancies, reporting on patient and tumour characteristics, treatment, and survival outcomes. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with primary temporal bone cancer and cancers extending to the temporal bone managed by the Queensland Skull Base Unit (Princess Alexandra Hospital) between 2000 and 2019. Results A total of 222 patients were identified, of which 203 (91.4%) had cutaneous primaries, with 167 (75.2%) being squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). 73.9% presented with locoregionally recurrent or residual disease. Secondary tumours (92.8%) were 12 times more frequent than primary malignancies (7.2%), with the preauricular subsite the most common (45.5%). In the 201 patients (90.5%) who underwent curative intent surgery, 5‐year overall survival, disease‐free survival (DFS), and disease‐specific survival was 46.6%, 52.2%, and 65.9%, respectively. The preauricular subsite (p = 0.004), melanoma (vs. SCC, p = 0.027), involved margins (p < 0.001), and pathologically involved nodes (p < 0.001) were associated with significantly worse DFS. Conclusion This is one of the largest studies of temporal bone malignancy in the literature, comprised primarily of secondary cutaneous malignancies. Although clear differences in epidemiological characteristics exist around the world, survival remains poor. Treatment should focus on achieving a clear margin of resection to optimize outcomes.
Background In our experience, the anterior carotid sheath forms an important plane of dissection when excising temporal bone region cancers. However, its anatomical composition, relationships, and radiological appearance remains unclear. Methods Eight sides of cadaveric heads were dissected. Anatomical findings were correlated with a high‐resolution baseline T1 MRI. Results The anterior carotid sheath was formed by the tensor‐vascular‐styloid fascia, stylopharyngeal fascia, buccopharyngeal fascia (BPF), and longus capitis fascia (LCF), and appeared as a hypointense line on MRI. Not previously described, the glossopharyngeal nerve pierced the sheath 9.0 mm (SD 2.1 mm) below the skull base and traveled through its LCF and BPF layers to exit near the pharynx. Conclusion Multiple fascial layers formed the anterior carotid sheath at the skull base, and this was radiologically identifiable. Further studies are required to validate findings and investigate the role this fascial plane has in forming an effective barrier to spread of malignancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.