Strong evidence (double-blind and open studies) supports the use of topical tacrolimus ointment in oral lichen planus, with efficacy at least equal to topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment. Treatment of oral lichen planus with topical tacrolimus ointment can result in demonstrable blood tacrolimus levels, but without clinically significant adverse events. Strong evidence (double-blind and open studies) supports the use of topical pimecrolimus 1% cream in oral lichen planus, with efficacy equal to that of topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste. For vulvovaginal lichen planus, pimecrolimus was superior to placebo in one double-blind study, and tacrolimus was effective in open studies. Only case reports support the efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in cutaneous lichen planus.
Skin diagnoses were often unrelated to the underlying rheumatologic diagnosis. Rheumatologists and dermatologists can both benefit from being aware of the dermatologic conditions that rheumatologic patients are experiencing.
There is strong evidence to suggest that the use of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment and pimecrolimus 1% cream is superior or equally efficacious as traditional therapies for OLP. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are well tolerated, with no significant systemic adverse effects.
Biologic agents have been shown to have variable results in the treatment of refractory HS. Enough low-grade evidence has been accumulated to make the use of these agents suitable in HS. Until more clinical trials are performed on this topic, physicians should use clinical judgment when treating HS with biologic agents and be cautious by watching for significant adverse effects.
The prolonged nature of EAC in our patient and our inability to identify known associations of malignancies, including medications, connective tissue disorders, systemic disorders, and infections, led us to postulate that her EAC was related to her Crohn disease. A thorough review of the literature failed to detect any previous reports linking Crohn disease and EAC.
Background: Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, also known as Rosai–Dorfman disease, is a rare proliferation of non-Langerhans histiocytes. Cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease is a rare subtype of Rosai–Dorfman disease limited to the skin with variable clinical presentation. Case summary: A 59-year-old female with a history of osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, and follicular B-cell lymphoma presented with pruritic, erythematous, dome-shaped papules that developed while on chemotherapy treatment. During cutaneous disease progression, the patient was further diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome. Histology review revealed patchy staining for S100 in the CD68+ histiocytes within the dermis with no enlarged histiocytes or emperipolesis. Given the absence of other findings, this was interpreted as cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease. Conclusion: There is still little known about the aetiology and pathogenesis of cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease. Non-specific immunohistochemistry in the midst of lymphoma, immunosuppressive treatments, and myelodysplastic syndrome produced a blurred diagnostic picture and delayed appropriate treatment, highlighting the diagnostic challenges of cutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.