We report here the adoptive transfer, to patients with metastatic melanoma, of highly selected tumorreactive T cells directed against overexpressed self-derived differentiation antigens after a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. This approach resulted in the persistent clonal repopulation of T cells in those cancer patients, with the transferred cells proliferating in vivo, displaying functional activity, and trafficking to tumor sites. This led to regression of the patients' metastatic melanoma as well as to the onset of autoimmune melanocyte destruction. This approach presents new possibilities for the treatment of patients with cancer as well as patients with human immunodeficiency virus-related acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and other infectious diseases.Immunotherapy of patients with cancer requires the in vivo generation of large numbers of highly reactive antitumor lymphocytes that are not restrained by normal tolerance mechanisms and are capable of sustaining immunity against solid tumors. Immunization of melanoma patients with cancer antigens can increase the number of circulating CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor cells (pCTLs), but to date this has not correlated with clinical tumor regression, suggesting a defect in function or activation of the pCTLs (1).Adoptive cell transfer therapies provide the opportunity to overcome tolerogenic mechanisms by enabling the selection and activation of highly reactive T cell subpopulations and by manipulation of the host environment into which the T cells are introduced. However, prior clinical trials, including the transfer of highly active antitumor T cell clones, failed to demonstrate engraftment and persistence of the transferred cells (2-5). Lymphodepletion can have a marked effect on the efficacy of T cell transfer therapy in murine models (6-9) and may depend on the destruction of regulatory cells, disruption of homeostatic T cell regulation, or abrogation of other normal tolerogenic mechanisms.To determine whether prior lymphodepletion might improve the persistence and function of adoptively transferred cells, 13 HLA-A2 + patients with metastatic melanoma received immunodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 7 days before the
PurposeWe investigated the combination of lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by the adoptive transfer of autologous tumor reactive lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma.
Patients and MethodsThirty-five patients with metastatic melanoma, all but one with disease refractory to treatment with high-dose interleukin (IL)-2 and many with progressive disease after chemotherapy, underwent lymphodepleting conditioning with two days of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) followed by five days of fludarabine (25 mg/m 2 ). On the day following the final dose of fludarabine, all patients received cell infusion with autologous tumor-reactive, rapidly expanded tumor infiltrating lymphocyte cultures and high-dose IL-2 therapy.
ResultsEighteen (51%) of 35 treated patients experienced objective clinical responses including three ongoing complete responses and 15 partial responses with a mean duration of 11.5 ± 2.2 months. Sites of regression included metastases to lung, liver, lymph nodes, brain, and cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues. Toxicities of treatment included the expected hematologic toxicities of chemotherapy including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia, the transient toxicities of high-dose IL-2 therapy, two patients who developed Pneumocystis pneumonia and one patient who developed an Epstein-Barr virus-related lymphoproliferation.
ConclusionLymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by the transfer of highly avid antitumor lymphocytes can mediate significant tumor regression in heavily pretreated patients with IL-2 refractory metastatic melanoma.Address reprint requests to
Administration of anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody plus peptide vaccination can cause durable objective responses, which correlate with the induction of autoimmunity, in patients with metastatic melanoma.
The in vivo release profile of the DEX implant in an animal eye was similar to the pharmacokinetics achieved with pulse administration of corticosteroids (high initial drug concentration, followed by a prolonged period of low concentration). These results are consistent with those in clinical studies supporting the use of the DEX implant for the extended management of posterior segment diseases.
The safety and effectiveness of systemic and topical medical therapies for ocular disorders are limited due to poor ocular drug uptake, nonspecificity to target tissues, systemic side effects, and poor adherence to therapy. Intravitreal injections can enhance ocular drug delivery, but the need for frequent retreatment and potential injection-related side effects limit the utility of this technique. Sustained-release drug delivery systems have been developed to overcome these limitations; such systems can achieve prolonged therapeutic drug concentrations in ocular target tissues while limiting systemic exposure and side effects and improving patient adherence to therapy. A critical factor in the development of safe and effective drug delivery systems has been the development of biocompatible polymers, which offer the versatility to tailor drug release kinetics for specific drugs and ocular diseases. Ocular implants include nonbiodegradable and biodegradable designs, with the latter offering several advantages. The polymers most commonly used in biodegradable delivery systems are synthetic aliphatic polyesters of the poly-α-hydroxy acid family including polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, and polylactic-co-glycolic acid. The characteristics of these polymers for medical applications as well as the pharmacological properties, safety, and clinical effectiveness of biodegradable drug implants for the treatment of ocular diseases are reviewed herein.
Cidofovir was efficacious in delaying progression of previously untreated CMV retinitis. Treatment was associated with manageable side effects; strict adherence to monitoring of renal function before cidofovir was administered and concomitant administration of probenecid and saline hydration appeared to minimize drug-related nephrotoxicity.
Objective. To investigate the safety and efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods. Children who met the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for JIA with active uveitis, who had anterior chamber cells of >1؉ or requiring topical corticosteroid >3 times daily, and who were on a stable regimen for arthritis treatment were eligible. Study participants received etanercept (0.4 mg/kg) or placebo administered subcutaneously twice weekly for 6 months. All participants received open-label etanercept for an additional 6 months. Results. Five patients received placebo and 7 received etanercept. Three of the 7 patients treated with etanercept and 2 of the 5 placebo-treated patients were considered ophthalmic successes (P ؍ 1.0). One patient in each treatment group was considered a treatment failure. Three of the 7 etanercept-treated and 2 of the 5 placebo-treated patients were neither successes nor failures by our definition. There were no serious adverse events for any patient during the entire study period. Reports of minor infections were comparable in each treatment group, 71% for etanercept and 60% for placebo (P ؍ 0.58). Conclusion. In this small pilot study there was no apparent difference in the anterior segment inflammation between patients treated with etanercept and placebo. The stringent criteria used to measure ophthalmic success of treatment and the small patient population limit the implications of our findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.