SUMMARYUnit load testing of boxes reported in the literature typically uses empty boxes to explore the impact and interactions among box confi gurations, pallet support and other environmental parameters. However, this approach leads to failure in the weakest box in the unitized structure, while in the fi eld, failure almost always occurs in the bottom box, which may or may not be the weakest. We fi nd in this paper that mathematically, numerically and experimentally, forcing box failure to the bottom results in higher test values. While this occurs naturally for boxes in use in the fi eld, it is an interaction which to date has been overlooked by researchers examining box performance in the lab. The impact on box estimation can be on the order of 5% or more, which can be as signifi cant as some of the environmental factors we are working to quantify, and which can have signifi cant cost implications. To improve the assessment used in the industry to account for the impact of a box's 'in use environment' on its performance, we need further testing on confi gurations where the boxes are loaded.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.